Abstract
Interacting with schoolteachers , school administrators , and education policy makers in the course of my research on game-based learning , I am often struck by how the idea of using games to support student learning is conflated with that of using games to teach facts, concepts, and other forms of “knowledge in pieces” (diSessa in Constructivism in the computer age pp. 49–70, 1988) .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Chap. 5, I illustrate how games can be very effectively used in learning chemistry.
- 2.
- 3.
I take up the issues of meaning and meaning making in detail in Chap. 3.
- 4.
In Chap. 3, I shall explain why Bloom’s taxonomy is deeply problematic for learning, as opposed to instruction.
- 5.
In this discussion, I have not addressed parents, another critical stakeholder in the ecology of schooling, because this group has been less well researched. Suffice to say that parents want to see their children do well, and this usually translates quite directly into meaning that they want to see their children excel in the conventional game of “business-as-usual” schooling.
References
Abt, C. C. (1987/1970). Serious games. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Aldrich, C. (2009). The complete guide to simulations and serious games: How the most valuable content will be created in the age beyond Gutenberg to Google. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Araya, D., & Peters, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press Slavic Series, No. 1. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bate, F., MacNish, J., & Males, S. (2014). The politics of gaming in schools: a sociocultural perspective from Western Australia. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 306–327. doi:10.1080/17439884-2013.872655.
Bell, E. (2008). Theories of performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
Chee, Y. S. (2014). Interrogating the Learning Sciences as a design science: Leveraging insights from Chinese philosophy and Chinese medicine. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33(1), 89–103. doi:10.1007/s11217-013-9367-2.
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.
de Freitas, S. I. (2006). Using games and simulations for supporting learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(4), 343–358.
diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Evans, R. (2001). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Garrison, M., & Bromley, H. (2004). Social contexts, defensive pedagogies, and the (mis)uses of educational technology. Educational Policy, 18, 589–613.
Gee, J. P. (2007a). Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning and literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Gee, J. P. (2007b). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (Revised and updated ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hodas, S. (1996). Technology refusal and the organisational culture of schools. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerisation and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Iacovides, I., Aczel, J., Scanlon, E., & Woods, W. (2012). Investigating the relationships between informal learning and player involvement in digital games. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 321–327.
Ito, M. (2009). Engineering play: A cultural history of children’s software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 K–12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kapp, K. M., Blair, L., & Mesch, R. (2014). The gamification of learning and instruction fieldbook: Ideas into practice. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Lacasa, P. (2013). Learning in real and virtual worlds: Commercial video games as educational tools. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Macdonald, G., & Hursh, D. (2006). Twenty-first century schools: Knowledge, networks, and new economies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mäyrä, F. (2008). An introduction to game studies: Games in culture. London, UK: Sage.
O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455–474.
Perkins, D. N. (2009). Making learning whole: How seven principles of teaching can transform education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me Mom—I’m learning!. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
Raessens, J., & Goldstein, J. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of computer game studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schechner, R. (2003). Performance theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age: A critical analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sheldon, L. (2012). The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game. Boston, MA: Course Technology.
Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2007). The play of imagination: Extending the literary mind. Games and Culture, 2(2), 149–172.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Trueit, D. (Ed.). (2012). Pragmatism, post-modernism, and complexity theory: The “fascinating imaginative realm” of William E. Doll, Jr. New York, NY: Routledge.
Tyler, R. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: Education for the Internet age. New York, NY: Routledge.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: Free Press.
Whitton, N. (2014). Digital games and learning: Research and theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., et al. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89.
Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. IEEE Computer, 38(9), 25–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chee, Y.S. (2016). Introduction. In: Games-To-Teach or Games-To-Learn. Gaming Media and Social Effects. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-518-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-518-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-517-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-518-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)