Abstract
Since 1996, Malaysia’s higher education industry has evolved and expanded rapidly. As a result, stiffer competition exists between public higher education institutions (HEIs) and private higher education institutions (PHEIs) in various aspects such as service quality provided to students in terms of facilities, knowledge, and learning experiences. This situation is further aggravated when the market and social environment put much pressure on both HEIs and PHEIs to provide relevant programs and satisfactory service which at least surpassed the standards set by the MOHE. Obviously, both HEIs and PHEIs need to leverage their efforts in ensuring improvement in the quality of their services. In doing so, the quality of the services provided should be measured beforehand to identify their strengths and weaknesses. Nevertheless, the most accurate method of measuring the quality of services is strongly debated. In such light, this study compares two methods which are widely used in measuring service quality, namely, importance-performance analysis (IPA) and service quality dimensions (SERVQUAL). Based on such comparisons, this study has found several elements in IPA and SERVQUAL that can complement each other: (1) specific dimensions of attribute, (2) graphic visualization of result, and (3) transformation of result into strategic action. Hence, combining both IPA and SERVQUAL may be beneficial in providing new avenue for service quality measurement in the higher education industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Da WC (2007) Public and private higher education institutions in Malaysia: competing, complementary of crossbreeds as education providers. National Higher Education Research Institute, Penang
Anonymous (1996) Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996. Attorney general’s chambers of Malaysia, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2012/Act%20555%20-%20Private%20Higher%20Educational%20Institutions%20Act%201996.pdf
Malaysia Higher Education Statistics (2013) Ministry of Higher Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia, 16 December 2013 2002–2012
Virdee HS (2011) Malaysia: many private colleges have quality issues. University World News, 20 February 2012. Available http://www.universityworldnews.com
Vaz A, Mansori S (2013) Malaysian private education quality: application of SERVQUAL model. Int Educ Stud 6:164
Arokiasamy ARA, Nagappan K (2012) An analysis of globalization and higher education in Malaysia. Bus Intell J 5:141–150
Donaldson B, McNicholas C (2004) Understanding the postgraduate education market for UK-based students: a review and empirical study. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 9:346–360
Srinivas D, Steven L, Madhavi AD (2011) Beyond service attributes: do personal values matter? J Serv Mark 25:33–46
Clemes MD, Gan CEC, Kao H (2007) University student satisfaction: an empirical analysis. J Mark High Educ 17:292–325
Wilkins S, Balakrishnan MS (2013) Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education. Int J Educ Manag 27:143–156
Sultan P, Wong HY (2013) Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: a qualitative research approach. Qual Assur Educ 21:70–95
Lewis RC, Booms BH (1983) The marketing aspects of service quality. In: Berry L, Shostack G, Upah G (eds) Emerging perspectives on services marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 99–107
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 49:41–50
Rahman MS, Khan AH, Haque MM (2012) A conceptual study on the relationship between service quality towards customer satisfaction: servqual and Gronroos's service quality model perspective. Asian Soc Sci 8(13):2012, Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education, Online Published: 19 Oct 2012
Kasper H, Van Helsdingen P, De Vries W (1999) Services marketing management. Wiley, New York
Roland KY (2008) Servicing service quality in higher education: quest for excellence. J Horiz 16:152–161
Khodayari F, Khodayari B (2011) Service quality in higher education. Case study: measuring service quality of Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh branch. Interdiscip J Res Bus 1:38–46
DiDomenico E, Bonnici J (1996) Assessing service quality within the educational environment. Educ-Indianap 116:353–359
Asaduzzaman, Hossain M, Rahman M (2013) Service quality and student satisfaction: a case study on private universities in Bangladesh. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci 1:128–135
Zammuto RF, Keaveney SM, O’Connor EJ (1996) Rethinking student services: assessing and improving service quality. J Mark High Educ 7:45–70
Hasan HFA, Ilias A, Rahman RA, Razak MZA (2008) Service quality and student satisfaction: a case study at private higher education. Int Bus Res 1:163–175
Sultan P, Wong HY (2012) Cultures’ consequences in the assessment of higher education service quality: the case of CQU, Australia. In: Sharing the cup of knowledge, Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC), Adelaide
Martilla JA, James JC (1977) Importance-performance analysis. J Mark 41:77–79
Matzler K, Bailom F, Hinterhuber HH, Renzl B, Pichler J (2004) The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: reconsideration of IPA analysis. Ind Market Manag 33:271–277
Kitcharoen K (2004) The importance-performance analysis of service quality in administrative departments of private universities in Thailand. ABAC J 24:20–46
Oh H (2001) Revisiting importance–performance analysis. Tour Manage 22:617–627
Sheng X, Simpson PM, Siguaw JA (2014) US winter migrants’ park community attributes: an importance–performance analysis. Tour Manage 43:55–67
Ennew CT, Reed GV, Binks MR (1993) Importance-performance analysis and the measurement of service quality. Eur J Mark 27:59–70
Daud S, Sapuan NM, Abidin N, Rajadurai J (2011) Do business graduates’ attributes fulfill industry requirements and expectations? Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5:68–74
O’Neill MA, Palmer A (2004) Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Qual Assur Educ 12:39–52
O’Neill M, Wright C, Fitz F (2001) Quality evaluation in on-line service environments: an application of the IPA technique. Manag Serv Qual 11:402–417
Zhu DS, Lin CT, Tsai CH, Wu JF (2010) A study on the evaluation of customers’ satisfaction – the perspective of quality. In: 4th international quality conference. Center for Quality, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kragujevac, 19 May 2010
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64:12–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zakariah, M.R., Zakariah, S., Pyeman, J. (2016). IPA vs. SERVQUAL: Service Quality Measurement for Higher Education Industry. In: Pyeman, J., Wan Rashid, W., Hanif, A., Syed Mohamad, S., Tan, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st AAGBS International Conference on Business Management 2014 (AiCoBM 2014). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-426-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-426-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-425-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-426-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)