Skip to main content

Effect of Anthropogenic Activities on the Rate of Soil CO2 Flux in the Dipterocarpus Forest Ecosystem of Northeast India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to study the effect of anthropogenic activities, i.e. burning and logging on the rate of soil CO2 flux and its relationship with the abiotic and the biotic factor in the Dipterocarpus forest of Northeast India. Rates of soil CO2 flux were found to be the highest in burnt and the lowest in logged forest site. Seasonally soil CO2 flux rate was found to be maximum in rainy season and minimum in winter season in all the study sites. Simple linear regression shows there is a strong positive relationship between soil CO2 flux and soil moisture, temperature, and soil organic carbon. Soil CO2 flux rate can be altered through different forest management practices such as harvesting, thinning, and burning to mitigate climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Han G, Zhou G, Xu Z, Yang Y, Liu J, Shi K (2007) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling the spatial and temporal variation of soil CO2 flux in an agricultural ecosystem. Soil Bio Biochem 39:418–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Zha T, Luo Z, Zheng J, Sun OJ (2013) Predicting soil CO2 flux using carbon stock in roots, litter and soil organic matter in forests of Loess Plateau in China. Soil Biol Biochem 57:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA (2000) Soil CO2 flux and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochem 48:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil CO2 flux and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schimel DS, Braswell BH, Holland EA, McKeown R, Ojima DS, Painter TH, Parton WJ, Townsend AR (1994) Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Glob Biog Cyc 8:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Townsend AR, Vitousek PM, Holland EA (1992) Tropical soils could dominate the shortterm carbon cycle feedbacks to increased global temperatures. Climatic Change 22:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2001) Soil CO2 flux within riparian buffers and adjacent crop fields. Plant Soil 229:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Devi NB, Yadava PS (2009) Emission of CO2 from the soil and immobilization of carbon in microbes in a sub-tropical mixed oak forest ecosystem, Manipur, N.E., India. Cur Sc 96:1630–1637

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maier M, Schack-Kirchner H, Hildebrand EE, Schindler D (2011) Soil CO2 efflux vs. soil CO2 flux: implications for flux models. Agri For Meteor 151:1723–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qi Y, Xu M (2001) Separating the effects of moisture and temperature on soil CO2 efflux in a coniferous forest in the Sierra Nevada mountains. Plant Soil 237:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yohannes Y, Shibistova O, Abate A, Fetine M, Guggenberger G (2011) Soil CO2 efflux in an Afromontane forest of Ethiopia as driven by seasonality and tree species. For Ecol Manag 261:1090–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen W, Jia X, Zha T, Wu B, Zhang Y, Li C, Wang X, He G, Yu H, Chen G (2013) Soil CO2 flux in a mixed urban forest in China in relation to soil temperature and water content. Eur J Soil Biol 54:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thokchom A, Yadava PS (2014) Soil CO2 flux in different ecosystem of North-East India. Curr Sci 107(1):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wiseman PE, Seiler JR (2004) Soil CO2 flux across four age classes of plantation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) on the Virginia Piedmont. For Ecol Manag 192:297–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson JM, Ingrame SI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility (TSBF), Methods handbook internation union of biological sciences, 77

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh JS, Gupta SR (1977) Plant decomposition and soil CO2 flux in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot Rev 43:449–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fritze H, Smolender A, Levula T, Kitunen V, Malkoner E (1994) Wood ash fertilization and fire treatments in a scots pine forest stand: effects on the organic layer, microbial biomass and microbial activity. Biol Fert Soils 17:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mac Donald LH, Huffman EL (2004) Post fire soil water repellency: persistance and soil moisture thresholds. Soil Sc Soc Amer J 68:1729–1734

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmermann M, Meir P, Bird M, Malhi Y, Ccahuana A (2009) Litter contribution to diurnal and annual soil CO2 flux in tropical montane cloud forest. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1338–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N et al (2001) Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil CO2 flux. Nature 411:789–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flerchinger GN, Pierson FB (1997) Modelling plant canopy effects on variability of soil temperature and water: model calibration and validation. J Arid Environ 35:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lytle DE, Cronan CS (1998) Comparative soil CO2 evolution, litter decay, and root dynamics in clearcut and uncut spruce-fir forest. For Ecol Manage 103:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laishram ID, Yadava PS, Kakati LN (2002) Soil CO2 flux in a mixed oak forest ecosystem at shiroy hills, Manipur in North Eastern India. Inter J Ecol Envt Sc 28:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Bio Biochem 27:753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A (2010) Temperature-associated increases in the global soil CO2 flux record. Nature 464:579–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryan MG, Linder S, Vose JM, Hubbard RM (1994) Dark respiration of pines (Copenhagen). Ecol Bul 43:50–63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Adachi M, Bekku YS, Rashidah W, Okuda T, Koizumi H (2006) Difference in soil CO2 flux between different tropical ecosystems. Appl Soil Ecol 34:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li LJ, You MY, Shi HA, Ding XL, Qiao YF, Han XZ (2013) Soil CO2 emissions from a cultivated mollisol: effects of organic amendments, soil temperature and moisture. Eur J Soil Biol 55:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007 synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Working group contributions to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 23–73

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cooney CM (2010) The perception factor: climate change gets personal. Environ Health Pers 118(11):A484–A489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kutílek M (2011) Soils and climate change. Soil Tillage Res. 117:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. IPCC (1995) Scientific assessments of climate change. The policymaker’s summary of working group 1 to the intergovernmental panel on climate change, WMO/UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sundquist ET (1993) The global carbon budget. Science 259:934–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ciais P, Tans PP, Trolier M, White JWC, Francey RJ (1995) A large northern hemisphere terrestrial CO2 sink indicated by the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2. Science 269:1098–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Houghton JT, Filho LGM, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenburg A, Maskell K (1996) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change: contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. S. Yadava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yadava, P.S., Thokchom, A. (2021). Effect of Anthropogenic Activities on the Rate of Soil CO2 Flux in the Dipterocarpus Forest Ecosystem of Northeast India. In: Goel, M., Satyanarayana, T., Sudhakar, M., Agrawal, D.P. (eds) Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0028-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0029-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics