Skip to main content

CO2 Sequestration Through Phytoremediation Techniques with Special Emphasis on Urban Forestry to Mitigate Climate Change Impact

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere reached high, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Report and became parts per million in December 2018. The main causes of global warming are emission of CO2 and other Green House Gases (GHG), and it is due to anthropogenic activities. To reduce the impact, sequestrating CO2 through photosynthetic process is more effective. This process known as phytoremediation has been used to clean up greenhouse gases, heavy metals, pesticides, xenobiotics, organic compounds, and toxic aromatic pollutants. It is a cost-effective technique to mitigate global warming. Plants capture atmospheric CO2 and convert it into organic compounds. The CO2 sequestration of plants through the leaf and extensive root systems is useful for reduction of CO2 by the potential assimilating capacity plants. Different plant species have different capacity of carbon sequestration potential. Plants that are identified and grown in and around the urban and industrial areas can reduce the air pollutants. They act as a wind breaker to minimize the transportation of air pollutants; the article has emphasis on the development of greenbelt model in urban forestry by planting more CO2 assimilating plants. The benefits of developing this model will not only sequester CO2, but also improve micro-climate of the urban area and increase urban biodiversity as best practices for sustainable environment and urban development. Three case studies are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arya A, Negi SS, Kathota JC, Patel AN, Kalubarme MH, Garg JK (2017) Carbon sequestration analysis of dominant tree species using geo-informatics technology in Gujarat State (INDIA). Int J Environ Geoinformatics 4(2):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asha A, Juwarkar AA, Varghese AO, Singh SK, Aher VV, Thawale PR (2011) Carbon sequestration potential in above ground biomass of natural reserve forest of Central India,(2011). Int J Agric Res Rev 1(2):80–86

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckett KP, Freer Smith PH, Taylor G (2000) Effective tree species for local air quality management. Arboricultural J 26(1):12–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE (2011) Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ pollut 159(8–9):2078–2087

    Google Scholar 

  5. FAO (2016) Guidelines on urban and peri-urban forestry

    Google Scholar 

  6. Govindaraju M, Ganeshkumar RS, Muthukumaran VR, Visvanathan P (2012) Identification and evaluation of air-pollution-tolerant plants around lignite-based thermal power station for greenbelt development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(4):1210–1223

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta B, Sharma S (2014) Estimation of biomass and carbon sequestration of trees in informally protected areas of Rajouri, J & K. Int Res J Environ Sci 3(6):56–61

    Google Scholar 

  8. IPCC (2001) Intergovermental panel for climate. In: Climate change: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kapoor CS, Chittora AK (2016) Efficient control of air pollution through plants a cost effective alternatives. J Climatol Weather Forecast 4(184):2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiran GS, Kinnary S (2011) Carbon sequestration by urban trees on roadsides of Vadodara city. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(4):3066–3070

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumari P, Nema AK (2017) Impact of urbanization on climate change in Delhi NCR due to land use changes. In: ASCE India conference 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482032.033

  12. Maiti R, Rodriguez HG, Kumari ChA (2015) Trees and shrubs with high carbon fixation/concentration. For Res S 1:2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Negi J, Hashimoto-Sugimoto M, Kusumi K, Iba K (2013) New approaches to the biology of stomatal guard cells. Plant Cell Physiol 55 (2):241–250

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pant H, Tewari A (2013) Carbon sequestration potential of Chir Pine (Pinusroxburghii. Sarg) forest on two contrasting aspects in Kumaun Central Himalaya between 1650 and 1860 m elevation. Appl Ecol Environ Sci 1(6):110–112

    Google Scholar 

  15. Potdar Vishnu R, Patil Satish S (2016) Carbon Storage and Sequestration by trees in and around University Campus of Aurangabad City, Maharashtra. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 5(4):5459–5468

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma M, Dikshit O (2016) Comprehensive Study on Green House Gases (GHGs) in Delhi, Report submitted to DPCC. www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in

  17. Toochi EC (2018) Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2 Forest Res EngInt 2(3):60

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tripathi M, Joshi H (2015) Carbon flow in Delhi urban forest ecosystems. Ann Biol Res 6(8):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  19. Udayakumar M, Selvam A, Sekar T (2018) Aboveground biomass stockpile and carbon sequestration potential of Albiziasaman in Chennai Metropolitan City, India. Plant 6(3):60

    Google Scholar 

  20. Urban Greening Guidelines (2014) Town and country planning organisation government of India ministry of urban development

    Google Scholar 

  21. Waran A, Patwardhan A (2001) Urban carbon burden of Pune City: a case study from India (Doctoral dissertation, Master thesis submitted to University of Pune

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, FuY, Sun Y (2013) Carbon concentration variability of Larixolgensis in North-Eastern China. Adv J Food Sci Technol 5(5):627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the UGC-SAP, DST-FIST, and MoEF & CC, New Delhi, for their financial support to carry out the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Govindaraju .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Govindaraju, M., Fowmitha Banu, J., Senthamil selvi, S., Goel, M. (2021). CO2 Sequestration Through Phytoremediation Techniques with Special Emphasis on Urban Forestry to Mitigate Climate Change Impact. In: Goel, M., Satyanarayana, T., Sudhakar, M., Agrawal, D.P. (eds) Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0028-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0029-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics