Abstract
Economic growth, due to increased consumerism, extravagance and human greed, necessitates higher energy demand. Fossil fuels burning, which generates carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, provides this energy resulting in a quantum jump in carbon dioxide emission and accumulation. Carbon cycle and other natural processes like mineralization of carbon dioxide through weathering of rocks rich in magnesium or calcium are inadequate to remove excess greenhouse gases. This has caused global climate change, threatening the existence of living beings including Homo sapiens. Removing carbon dioxide from atmosphere, either at the sites of carbon dioxide generation like power plants, called point capture of carbon dioxide (PCC) or in ambient air popularly known as direct air capture (DAC), therefore has become a necessity. In this chapter, DAC techniques like biosequestration, absorption and adsorption are discussed along with the challenges in their implementation. The DAC machines offer a greater flexibility of usage, as they are not tethered to the generation plants and can be placed at the site of subsequent usage of carbon dioxide or sequestration. Challenges in DAC are requirement of high energy, high water consumption and economic viability. Few companies have incorporated these techniques in their startups, and these have been deliberated along with the financial costs. It is concluded that initiating direct air capture as research and development projects on larger scale will help in developing viable options for carbon dioxide reduction as a future strategy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- PCC:
-
Point Capture of Carbon Dioxide
- DAC:
-
Direct Air Capture
- NOAA:
-
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- GDP:
-
Gross Domestic Product
- NCR:
-
National Capital Region
- TSA:
-
Temperature Swing Adsorption
- CE:
-
Carbon Engineering
- CC:
-
Carbon Capture
- EASAC:
-
European Academies Science Advisory Council
- NRL:
-
Naval Research Laboratory
- NASEM:
-
National Academies of Science - Engineering – Medicine
References
NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2019) USA along with its National centre for environmental information
Global climate report, Government of India, ministry of earth science report, 2019; Sea level Rise in India
Phillips O, Bitariho R, Taylor D, Sheil D (2020) Hubau et al nature 2020 carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian forests. Nature 579:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0
NASEM, National Academies of Science-Engineering-Medicines (2019) Negative emission
NASEM, National Academies of Science -Engineering-Medicines (2018) Direct air capture and mineral carbonation approaches for carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration, Washington D.C. USA<Date of Conference>
Puri A, Satyanarayana T (2010) Enzyme and microbe mediated carbon sequestration; CO2 sequestration technologies for clean energy. In: Qasim SZ, Goel M (eds) Daya Publishing House
Thokchom A, Yadava PS (2014) Soil CO2 flux in different ecosystem of North-East India. Curr Sci 107(1):99–105
PTI (2018) Vertical gardens: noida’s big plan to cut down pollution, enhance aesthetics Press Trust of India, August 12, 2018
Fasihi M (2019) Technoeconomic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants. J Cleaner Prod 224:957–980
Lackner K (2009) Director of center for negative carbon emissions at Arizona state university, capture of carbon dioxide from ambient air. Eur Phys J-Spec Top 176(1):93–106
Keith DW, Ha-Duong M, Stolaroff JK (2006) Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air. Climatic Change 74(1):17–45
Ishimoto Y, Sugiyama M, Kato E, Moriyama R, Tsuzuki K, Kurosawa A (2017) Putting costs of direct air capture in context. FCEA working paper series: 002. Washington DC: forum for climate engineering assessment
European Academies Science Advisory Council (2018) What role in paris agreement targets; Negative emission technologies
POPA, APS Panel on Public Affairs (2011) Direct air capture of CO2 with chemicals (DACCC)
Pielke RA Jr (2009) An idealized assessment of the economics of air capture of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy. Environ Sci Policy 12:216–225
Cressy D (2015) Commercial boost for firms that suck carbon from air. Nature 526:306–307
Acknowledgements
The author is thankful to Dr. Malti Goel, President, Climate Change Research Institute & Former Senior Adviser, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, for the support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sen, G. (2021). Research & Development Pathways/Challenges in Direct Air Capture of CO2. In: Goel, M., Satyanarayana, T., Sudhakar, M., Agrawal, D.P. (eds) Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0028-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0029-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)