Abstract
Automation through smart city technology deployments and big data analytics has the potential to create more liveable, sustainable, and equitable cities. However, internationally, there are many examples of smart city developments that have attracted criticism, concerns, and community backlash over issues such as data ethics, privacy, mass surveillance, commodification, and social control. In response, this chapter presents DataCare—a model for cities to practically implement technological sovereignty as a way to renew and maintain the social licence to operate smart city technology. Grounded in a critical review of the literature, the chapter argues that data collection and automation in smart cities must be more citizen and community-oriented. Informed by smart city developments in Toronto and Barcelona, the chapter introduces DataCare—a model for a dedicated facility hosted by the city and offered to citizens, communities, and businesses. The envisaged DataCare space can be tailored to raise awareness of data ethics, to run data literacy training seminars, to engage in participatory data analytics, and to speculate about city data futures. DataCare aims to increase data transparency and autonomy, showcase new business opportunities, and empower citizens and community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
decidim.barcelona.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
The study received approval from the University Human Research Ethics Committee (1700000037).
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
References
ABC News (2019) Hong Kong Protesters Cut Down Data-Collecting Lamppost. ABC News; Australian Broadcasting Corporation. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-24/hong-kong-protests-smart-lampposts-cut-down-surveillance-fears/11445606
Ajuntament de Barcelona (2019) Barcelona Digital City: Putting technology at the service of people. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/sites/default/files/pla_barcelona_digital_city_in.pdf
Alvares CA (1976) Homo faber: technology and culture in India, China and the west 1500–1972 [Technische Hogeschool Eindhoven]. https://research.tue.nl/files/3474012/68612.pdf
Anastasiu I, Foth M, Schroeter R, Rittenbruch M (2020) From repositories to switchboards: local governments as open data facilitators. In . Hawken S, Han H, Pettit C (eds) Open cities | Open data: collaborative cities in the information era. Springer Singapore, pp 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6605-5_15
Andrejevic M, Gates K (2014) Big data surveillance: introduction. Surveillance & Society 12(2):185–196
Angelidou M (2017) Smart city planning and development shortcomings. Tema. J Land Use Mobil Environ 10(1):77–94. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/4032
Anttiroiko A-V (2013) U-cities reshaping our future: reflections on ubiquitous infrastructure as an enabler of smart urban development. AI & Soc 28(4):491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0443-5
Barns S (2020) Platform urbanism: negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9725-8
Bilandzic M, Foth M (2014) Learning beyond books—strategies for ambient media to improve libraries and collaboration spaces as interfaces for social learning. Multimed Tools Appl 71(1):77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1432-x
Bilandzic M, Foth M (2017) Designing hubs for connected learning: Social, spatial and technological insights from Coworking, Hackerspaces and Meetup groups. In Carvalho L, Goodyear P, de Laat M (eds) Place-based spaces for networked learning. Routledge, pp 191–206. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724485-14
Brayne S (2017) Big data surveillance: the case of policing. Am Sociol Rev 82(5):977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865
Burgers T, Robinson DRS (2016) Networked authoritarianism is on the rise. Sicherh Und Frieden (S + F) / Secur Peace 34(4):248–252. https://doi.org/10.5771/0175-274X-2016-4-248
Buyle R, Taelman R, Mostaert K, Joris G, Mannens E, Verborgh R, Berners-Lee T (2020) Streamlining governmental processes by putting citizens in control of their personal data. Electron Gov Open Soc Chall Eurasia 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_26
Calzada I, Almirall E (2019) Barcelona’s grassroots-led urban experimentation: deciphering the “data commons” policy scheme. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2604618
Cardullo P, Kitchin R (2019) Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: the neoliberal logic of “citizen-focused” smart cities in Europe. Environ Plan C Polit Space 37(5):813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508
Cardullo P, Kitchin R, Di Feliciantonio C (2018) Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities 73:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.008
Carlson A, Sadowski J, Osborne N (2020, February 4) Darwin’s “smart city” project is about surveillance and control. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/darwins-smart-city-project-is-about-surveillance-and-control-127118
Cavoukian A (2012) Privacy by design: origins, meaning, and prospects for assuring privacy and trust in the information era. In Yee GOM (ed) Privacy protection measures and technologies in business organizations: aspects and standards. IGI Global, pp 170–208. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-501-4.ch007
Coleman R (2004) Images from a Neoliberal City: the state, surveillance and social control. Crit Criminol 12(1):21–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIT.0000024443.08828.d8
Cosgrave E, Arbuthnot K, Tryfonas T (2013) Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Proced Comput Sci 16:668–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.070
Couture S, Toupin S (2019) What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media Soc 21(10):2305–2322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
Cugurullo F (2018) Exposing smart cities and eco-cities: Frankenstein urbanism and the sustainability challenges of the experimental city. Environ Plan A 50(1):73–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17738535
Daly A, Devitt SK, Mann M (2019) Good data. Institute of Network Cultures. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/125605
Dezuanni M, Foth M, Mallan K, Hughes H (eds) (2017) Digital participation through social living labs: Valuing local knowledge, enhancing engagement. Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-01911-3
Doctoroff DL (2016) Reimagining cities from the internet up. Medium; Sidewalk Talk. https://medium.com/sidewalk-talk/reimagining-cities-from-the-internet-up-5923d6be63ba
Dodd V, Grierson J (2020, January 22) Non-violent groups on UK counter-terror list threaten legal action. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/22/minister-denies-government-considers-extinction-rebellion-extremist
Dourish P (2016) Algorithms and their others: algorithmic culture in context. Big Data Soc 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128
Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press
Estrada-Grajales C, Foth M, Mitchell P (2018) Urban imaginaries of co-creating the city: local activism meets citizen peer-production. J Peer Prod, 11. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/116171/
Filonik D, Rittenbruch M, Foth M (2014) Participatory data analytics: collaborative interfaces for data composition and visualisation. Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on visual information communication and interaction, pp 248–249. https://doi.org/10.1145/2636240.2636873
Forlano L, Mathew A (2014) From design fiction to design friction: speculative and participatory design of values-embedded urban technology. J Urban Technol 21(4):7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.971525
Forrest R, Wissink B (2017) Whose city now? Urban managerialism reconsidered (again). The Sociol Rev 65(2):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12415
Foth M (2017) The promise of blockchain technology for interaction design. Proceedings of the 29th Australian conference on computer-human interaction, pp 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156168
Foth M, Adkins B (2006) A research design to build effective partnerships between city planners, developers, government and urban neighbourhood communities. J Commun Inform 2(2). http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/viewArticle/292
Foth M, Brynskov M (2016) Participatory action research for civic engagement. In: Gordon E, Mihailidis P (eds) Civic media: technology, design, practice. MIT Press, pp 563–580
Foth M, Turner TJ (2019) The premise of institutioning for the proliferation of communities and technologies research. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on communities & technologies-transforming communities, pp 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328398
Foth M, Brynskov M, Ojala T (2015) Citizen’s right to the digital city. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6
Foth M, Tomitsch M, Satchell C, Haeusler MH (2015) From users to citizens: some thoughts on designing for polity and civics. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Australian special interest group for computer human interaction, pp 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838769
Foth M, Caldwell G, Fredericks J, Volz K (2018) Augmenting cities beyond bedazzlement: empowering local communities through immersive urban technologies. Workshop proceedings of augmenting cities and architecture with immersive technologies, pp 1–4. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/122841/
Foth M, Lankester A, Hughes H. (2018) Mixhaus: dissolving boundaries with a community makerspace. In Dezuanni M, Foth M, Mallan K, Hughes H (eds) Digital participation through social living labs. Chandos Publishing, pp 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102059-3.00006-X
Foth M, Mitchell P, Estrada-Grajales C (2020) Today’s internet for tomorrow’s cities: on algorithmic culture and urban imaginaries. In: Hunsinger J, Allen M, Klastrup L, (eds) Second international handbook of internet research. Springer, Netherlands, pp 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_23
Frauenberger C, Foth M, Fitzpatrick G (2018) On scale, dialectics, and affect: pathways for proliferating participatory design. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC) 2018. Participatory Design Conference (PDC), Hasselt, Belgium. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210591
Gaffney C, Robertson C (2018) Smarter than smart: Rio de Janeiro’s Flawed emergence as a smart city. J Urban Technol 25(3):47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102423
Galdon G (2017) Technological sovereignty? Democracy, data and governance in the digital era. CCCB Lab. http://lab.cccb.org/en/technological-sovereignty-democracy-data-and-governance-in-the-digital-era/
Galdon-Clavell G (2013) (Not so) smart cities?: the drivers, impact and risks of surveillance-enabled smart environments. Sci Public Policy 40(6):717–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct070
Galloway A, Caudwell C (2018) Speculative design as research method. In: Coombs G, McNamara A, Sade G (eds) Undesign: critical practice at the intersection of art and design. Routledge, pp 85–96. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315526379-8
Galor O, Tsiddon D (1997) Technological progress, mobility, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 87(3):363–382
Goldenfein J (2020) Australian police are using the clearview AI facial recognition system with no accountability. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/australian-police-are-using-the-clearview-ai-facial-recognition-system-with-no-accountability-132667
Graham S (2012) Digital Medieval. Surveill Soc 9(3):321–327
Grossi G, Pianezzi D (2017) Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities 69:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012
Hache A (2014) Technological sovereignty. In: Coredem (ed) For free information and open internet: independent journalists, community media and hacktivists take action. Ritimo, pp 165–174
Harvey D (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler Ser B Hum Geogr 71(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/490503
Hatton C (2015) China sets up huge “social credit” system. BBC. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-34592186
Hill K (2020) The secretive company that might end privacy as we know it. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html
Hitomi K (1994) Automation—its concept and a short history. Technovation 14(2):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90101-5
Hollands RG (2014) Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City. Camb J Reg Econ Soc, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011
Houghton K, Foth M, Miller E (2013) The continuing relevance of the library as a third place for users and non-users of IT: the case of Canada Bay. Aust Libr J 62(1):27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2013.771764
Huybrechts L, Benesch H, Geib J (2017) Institutioning: participatory design, co-design and the public realm. CoDesign 13(3):148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006
Hwang J-S (2009) u-City: the next paradigm of urban development. In Foth, M (ed) Handbook of research on urban informatics: the practice and promise of the real-time city. IGI Global, pp 367–378. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-152-0.ch025
Inmon WH, Linstedt D (2014) Data architecture: A primer for the data scientist. Morgan Kaufmann.
Katz, B, Wagner, J. (2014) The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America. Brookings Institution–Metropolitan Policy Program
Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJ 79(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Kitchin R (2015a) The promise and peril of smart cities. Comput Law J Soc Comput Law 26(2):1–5. https://www.scl.org/articles/3385-the-promise-and-perils-of-smart-cities
Kitchin R (2015b) Data-Driven, Networked Urbanism. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641802
Kitchin R (2017) Data-driven urbanism. In Kitchin, R, Lauriault, TP, McArdle, G (eds), Data and the City. Routledge, pp 44–56. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315407388-4
Leszczynski A (2015) Spatial big data and anxieties of control. Environ Plan. D Soc Space 33(6):965–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815595814
Liptak A (2017) Sent to prison by a software program’s secret algorithms. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/01/us/politics/sent-to-prison-by-a-software-programs-secret-algorithms.html
Lodato T, DiSalvo C (2018) Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm. Proceedings of the 15th participatory design conference: full papers-Volume 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210595
Luger E, Moran S, Rodden T (2013) Consent for all: revealing the hidden complexity of terms and conditions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 2687–2696. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481371
Lynch CR (2019) Contesting digital futures: urban politics, alternative economies, and the movement for technological sovereignty in Barcelona. Antipode 52(3):660–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12522
Macrorie R, Marvin S, While A (2019) Robotics and automation in the city: a research agenda. Urban Geogr 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1698868
Mann M, Mitchell P, Foth M, Anastasiu I (2020) #BlockSidewalk to Barcelona: technological sovereignty and the social licence to operate smart cities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 71(9), 1103-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.24387
March H, Ribera-Fumaz R (2018) Barcelona: from corporate smart city to technological sovereignty. In Karvonen A, Cugurullo F, Caprotti F (eds), Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation. Routledge, pp 227–242. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351166201-15
Markou C (2017) Why using AI to sentence criminals is a dangerous idea. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/why-using-ai-to-sentence-criminals-is-a-dangerous-idea-77734
Mattern S (2020) Post-It note city. Places J. https://doi.org/10.22269/200211
McLaughlin PJ (2015) Wanting to do more but bound to do less: a law Librarian’s Dilemma. Ref Librar 56(2):119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2014.982316
Mosco V (2019) The smart city in a digital world. Emerald Publishing
Mozur P (2019) One month, 500,000 face scans: How China Is Using A.I. to profile a minority. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/technology/china-surveillance-artificial-intelligence-racial-profiling.html
Mozur P, Kessel JM, Chan M (2019) Made in China, exported to the world: the surveillance state. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/24/technology/ecuador-surveillance-cameras-police-government.html
Nathan LP, Klasnja PV, Friedman B (2007) Value scenarios: a technique for envisioning systemic effects of new technologies. CHI ’07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 2585–2590. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241046
Nathan LP, Friedman B, Klasnja P, Kane SK, Miller JK (2008) Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394446
Naughton J (2020) Quick, cheap to make and loved by police–facial recognition apps are on the rise. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/commentisfree/2020/jan/25/facial-recognition-apps-are-on-the-rise
O’Flaherty K (2020) Clearview AI’s database has amassed 3 billion photos. This is how if you want yours deleted, you have to opt out. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2020/01/26/clearview-ais-database-has-amassed-3-billion-photos-this-is-how-if-you-want-yours-deleted-you-have-to-opt-out/
O’Malley P, Smith G (2019) Disruption as distraction: Darwin’s smart city program, public resistance and the digitisation of racialised governance. Working paper
Odendaal N (2016) Smart city: neoliberal discourse or urban development tool? In: Grugel J, Hammett D (eds) The palgrave handbook of international development. Palgrave McMillan, pp 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3
Pagallo U (2017) From automation to autonomous systems: a legal phenomenology with problems of accountability. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp 17–23. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/3
Pali B, Schuilenburg M (2019) Fear and fantasy in the smart city. Criti Criminol, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09447-7
Peled A (2013) The politics of big data: a three-level analysis. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2315891
Raetzsch C, Pereira G, Vestergaard LS, Brynskov M (2019) Weaving seams with data: conceptualizing city APIs as elements of infrastructures. Big Data Soc 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719827619
Rekow L (2015) Police, protests, and policy in Rio de Janeiro—mega-events, networked culture, and the right to the city. In: Foth M, Brynskov M, Ojala T (eds) Citizen’s right to the digital city: urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking. Springer, pp 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6_7
Ribera-Fumaz R (2019) Moving from smart citizens to technological sovereignty? In the right to the smart city, pp. 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191013
Rizaldi A, Althoff M (2015) Formalising traffic rules for accountability of autonomous vehicles. 2015 IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, pp 1658–1665. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.269
Robinson R, Rittenbruch M, Foth M, Filonik D, Viller S (2012) Street computing: towards an integrated open data application programming interface (API) for cities. J Urban Technol 19(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.698064
Roggema R (2013) The design charrette: ways to envision sustainable futures. Springer Science & Business Media
Rubinstein IS (2011) Regulating privacy by design. Berkeley Tech LJ 26:1409
Rubinstein IS, Good N (2013) Privacy by design: a counterfactual analysis of Google and Facebook privacy incidents. Berkeley Tech. LJ 28:1333
Sadowski J (2020) Too smart: how digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. MIT Press
Sadowski J, Pasquale FA (2015) The spectrum of control: a social theory of the smart city. First Monday 20(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i7.5903
Satariano A (2020) London police are taking surveillance to a whole new level. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/24/business/london-police-facial-recognition.html
Spagnoli F, van der Graaf S, Brynskov M (2019) The paradigm shift of living labs in service co-creation for smart cities: Synchroni city validation. Organizing for Digital Innovation, pp 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90500-6_11
Teli M, Foth M, Sciannamblo M, Anastasiu I, Lyle P (2020) Tales of institutioning and commoning: participatory design processes with a strategic and tactical perspective. Proceedings of the 16th participatory design conference (PDC), Manizales, Colombia. ACM, pp 159–171.
van Zoonen L (2016) Privacy concerns in smart cities. Gov Inf Quarterly 33(3):472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004
Veillette PT (1959) The rise of the concept of automation. In automation and society. Philosophical Library New York
Watson V (2013) African urban fantasies: dreams or nightmares? Environ Urban 26(1):215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813513705
West SM (2019) Data capitalism: redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Bus Soc 58(1):20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185
Wigan MR, Clarke R (2013) Big data’s big unintended consequences. Computer 46(6):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.195
Wylie B (2018) Sidewalk Toronto: Gaslighting Toronto Residents Backfired—Capacity’s Built and Power’s Shifted. Medium; Medium. https://medium.com/@biancawylie/sidewalk-toronto-gaslighting-toronto-residents-backfired-capacitys-built-and-power-s-shifted-77c455b150a3
Zuboff S (2015) Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J Inf Technol Impact 30(1):75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editors and reviewers for feedback as well as our study participants and project partners for their contributions and support: ThoughtWorks; the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of the Queensland State Government; the Consumer Policy Research Centre, and; Hack for Privacy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foth, M., Anastasiu, I., Mann, M., Mitchell, P. (2021). From Automation to Autonomy: Technological Sovereignty for Better Data Care in Smart Cities. In: Wang, B.T., Wang, C.M. (eds) Automating Cities. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8669-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8670-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)