Abstract
This chapter argues that the narratives of smart cities demonstrate the potential value of blockchain technologies. Drawing upon competing narratives within the cultural imaginary, both the ‘dream’ of a better city, and the ‘fear’ of an oppressive structure will highlight the need to consider both Bentham and Foucault’s Panopticon. The term ‘panopticon’ is defined and explored within the context of blockchain technology. In doing so three concepts are identified: the enabling nature of a panopticon; the use of a blockchain-enabled-panopticon to encourage human flourishing; and the ability for technology such as this to enhance standards above a basic minimum of the law. This chapter suggests that understanding smart cities, panopticon and blockchain, may allow for a better account for competing narratives of fear that can lead to a deeper understanding of how this technology can be deployed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott J (2018) China and the Internet: great firewall or panopticon? [WWW Document]. The Asia Dialogue. https://theasiadialogue.com/2018/09/05/china-and-the-internet-great-firewall-or-panopticon/
Ajunwa I (2018) Algorithms at work: productivity monitoring applications and wearable technology as the new data-centric research agenda for employment and labor law. St Louis Univ Law J 63:21
Ash B (1975) Faces of the future: the lessons of science fiction. Elek Books, London
Ayres I (1992) Responsive regulation transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford socio-legal studies. Oxford University Press, New York
Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bacon J, Michels JD, Millard C, Singh J (2018) Blockchain demystified: a technical and legal introduction to distributed and centralised ledgers. Richmond J Law Technol 25:1–106
Baldwin R, Black J (2007) Really responsive regulation.
Beebe B (1999) Law’s empire and the final frontier: legalizing the future in the early Corpus Juris Spatialis. Yale Law J 108:1737–1773
Biswas K, Muthukkumarasamy V (2016) Securing smart cities using blockchain technology 1392–1393. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC-SmartCity-DSS.2016.0198
Brunon-Ernst A (2016a) Beyond foucault new perspectives on Bentham’s panopticon. Routledge, London
Brunon-Ernst A (2016b) Deconstructing anopticism into the Plural panopticons. In: Brunon-Ernst A (ed), Beyond foucault new perspectives on Bentham’s panopticon. Routledge, London
Brunon-Ernst, A (2016c) Introduction. In: Brunon-Ernst A (ed) Beyond foucault new perspectives on Bentham’s panopticon. Routledge, London
Brunon-Ernst A, Tusseau G (2016) Epilogue: the panopticon as a contemporary icon. In: Brunon-Ernst A (ed) Beyond foucault new perspectives on Bentham’s panopticon. Routledge, London
Chalfen R (2014) “Your panopticon or mine?” Incorporating wearable technology’s glass and GoPro into visual social science. Vis Studies 29:299–310
Chan TF (2017) Debtors in China are placed on a blacklist that prohibits them from flying, buying train tickets, and staying at luxury hotels [WWW Document]. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-tax-blacklist-shames-debtors-2017-12?r=UK
Chavira T (2011) The smart panopticon-opolis [WWW Document]. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/ex/sustainablecitiescollective/smart-panopticopolis/28454/
Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M (2016) Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339
Coletta A (2019) Quayside, Toronto’s Google-linked smart city, draws opposition over privacy, costs [WWW Document]. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/quayside-torontos-google-linked-smart-city-draws-opposition-over-privacy-costs/2019/05/05/e0785500-6d12-11e9-bbe7-1c798fb80536_story.html
Cronin J (2019) Introduction: “the making of…,” adaptation and the (trans-)cultural imaginary. In: Cronin J (ed) The making of… adaptation and the cultural imaginary, Palgrave Studies in adaptation and visual culture. Springer, Cham, pp 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28349-0_1
Cuccuru P (2017) Beyond bitcoin: an early overview on smart contracts. Int J Law Inf Technol 25:179–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eax003
Davidson S, De Filippi P, Potts J (2018) Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. J Instit Econ 14:639–658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200
De Filippi P (2018) Blockchain and the law: the rule of code. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
De Landa M (1991) War in the age of intelligent machines. Zone
Dorri A, Kanhere SS, Jurdak R, Gauravaram P (2017) Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: the case study of a smart home. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom workshops). Presented at the 2017 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp 618–623. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2017.7917634
Duffy R (2019) Sidewalk labs and Toronto reach compromise on Smart City plans [WWW Document]. Morning Brew. https://www.morningbrew.com/emerging-tech/stories/2019/11/01/sidewalk-labs-toronto-reach-compromise-smart-city-plans
Evans J (2012) Move along, no panopticon to see here [WWW Document]. Tech Crunch. https://techcrunch.com/2012/08/18/move-along-no-panopticon-to-see-here/
Farrell H, Newman A (2019) Weaponized globalization: Huawei and the emerging battle over 5G Networks [WWW Document]. GLobal Asia. https://www.globalasia.org/v14no3/cover/weaponized-globalization-huawei-and-the-emerging-battle-over-5g-networks_henry-farrellabraham-newman
Fenn J, Raskino M (2008) Mastering the hype cycle: how to choose the right innovation at the right time. Harvard Business Review Press
Foucault M (1995) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, 2nd ed. Vintage Books, a division of Random House, New York
Fujihara A (2019) PoWaP: proof of work at proximity for a crowdsensing system for collaborative traffic information gathering. Internet of Things 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.02.006
Gatteschi V, Lamberti F, Demartini C, Pranteda C, Santamaría V (2018) Blockchain and smart contracts for insurance: is the technology mature enough? Future Internet 10:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10020020
Giungato P, Rana R, Tarabella A, Tricase C (2017) Current trends in sustainability of bitcoins and related blockchain technology. Sustainability 9:2214. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122214
Goh JPL (2015) Privacy, security, and wearable technology. Landslide 8
Gross A (2016) Dr. Frankenstein, or: how i leanred to stop worrying and love CRISPR-CAS9. Jurimetrics 56:413–447
Gunningham N, Grabosky P, Sinclair D (1998) Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Han R, Shapiro G, Gramoli V, Xu X (2019) On the performance of distributed ledgers for Internet of Things. Internet of Things 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100087
Hendrix J, Taniguchi T, Strom K, Barrick K, Johnson N (2018) The eyes of law enforcement in the new panopticon: police-community racial asymmetry and the use of surveillance technology. Surv Soc 16:53–68. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i1.6709
Jalia A, Bakker R, Ramage M (2018) The edge. Showcasing an exemplary IoT building. Centre for Digital Built Britain, Amsterdam
Joplin T (2018) Huawei, surveillance and why smart cities are the new panopticons [WWW Document]. Albawaba News. https://www.albawaba.com/news/huawei-surveillance-and-why-smart-cities-are-new-panopticons-1146432
Khare A., Merlino G, Longo F, Puliafito A, Vyas OP (2019) Design of a trustless smart city system: the #SmartME experiment. Internet of Things 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100126
Koskela H (2003) ‘Cam Era’—the contemporary urban panopticon. Surv Soc 1:292–313
Lecher C (2019) How Amazon automatically tracks and fires warehouse workers for ‘productivity’ [WWW Document]. The Verge. URL https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/25/18516004/amazon-warehouse-fulfillment-centers-productivity-firing-terminations
Lei A, Cruickshank H, Cao Y, Asuquo P, Ogah CPA, Sun Z (2017) Blockchain-based dynamic key management for heterogeneous intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Internet Things J 4:1832–1843. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2740569
Liao C, Bao S, Cheng C, Chen K (2017) On design issues and architectural styles for blockchain-driven IoT services. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics—Taiwan (ICCE-TW). Presented at the 2017 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics—Taiwan (ICCE-TW), pp 351–352. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-China.2017.7991140
Lindzon J (2019) How Toronto locals soured on Alphabet’s neighborhood of the future [WWW Document]. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90390377/alphabet-wants-to-turn-toronto-into-a-digital-city-locals-arent-so-sure
Lyon D (2005) Computer codes and mobile bodies. In: Lyon D (ed) Surveillance as social sorting : privacy, risk and automated discrimination. Routledge, London, p 13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994887
Lyon D (1994) The electronic eye : the rise of surveillance society. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Lyon D (1993) An electronic panopticon? A sociological critique of surveillance theory. Sociol Rev 41:653–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00896.x
Mapiq (2017) Smart building ecosystems: innovation through co-creation (Whitepaper). Mapiq
Marrington A (2017) Managing security issues and the hidden dangers of wearable technologies. Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics (AISPE) Book Series. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania
McGrath J (2019) Here’s what stands in the way of Sidewalk Labs’ plans for the Port Lands [WWW Document]. TVO. https://www.tvo.org/article/heres-what-stands-in-the-way-of-sidewalk-labs-plans-for-the-port-lands
Minoli D (2019) Special issue of the Elsevier IoT journal on blockchain applications in IoT environments. Internet of Things 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100149
Minoli D, Occhiogrosso B (2018) Blockchain mechanisms for IoT security. Internet of Things 1–2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2018.05.002
Monahan T (2017) Regulating belonging: surveillance, inequality, and the cultural production of abjection. J Cult Econ 10:191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2016.1273843
Mozur P (2019) One month, 500,000 face scans: how China is using A.I. to profile a minority [WWW Document]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/technology/china-surveillance-artificial-intelligence-racial-profiling.html?mod=djemCIO
Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system [WWW Document]. bitcoin.org. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Osman (2019) Google’s smart city project: aprivacy hot button [WWW Document]. ExpressVPN. https://www.expressvpn.com/blog/googles-smart-city-project-a-privacy-hot-button/
Panarello A., Tapas N., Merlino G, Longo F, Puliafito A (2018) Blockchain and IoT integration: a systematic survey. Sensors 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082575
Park HR, Babcock B (2017) The Legal battle around CRISPR gene-editing technology and its implications. Biotechnol Law Rep 36:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2017.29007.hrp
Pasquale F (2015) The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Peters TD, Crawley K (eds) (2018) Envisioning legality: law, culture and representation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, Oxon
Prada-Delgado MÁ, Baturone I, Dittmann G, Jelitto J, Kind A (2020) PUF-derived IoT identities in a zero-knowledge protocol for blockchain. Internet of Things 9:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100057
Privacy International (2017) Smart cities: Utopian Vision. Dystopian reality. Privacy International
Qadeer M (2019) The fallout of smart cities is social isolation [WWW Document]. The Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2019/08/06/the-fallout-of-smart-cities-is-social-isolation.html
Ramli D, Bergen M, Hunter G (2018) A company that’s helping build China’s panopticon won’t stop there. Bloomberg Businessweek, p 23
Randall T (2015) The most intelligent building in the world requests your presence in room 3 inside connected future of architecture. Bloomberg Businessweek, p 72
Robb L (2019) Thanatopolitics through technophobia: using Charlie Booker’s black mirror to reflect upon humanity in the face of advanced technology. Griffith J Law Hum Dignity
Schofield P (2009) Bentham: a guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury Publishing
Shieber J (2019) Sidewalk labs (Alphabet’s grand experiment in smart cities) will move forward with Toronto project [WWW Document]. Tech Crunch. https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/31/sidewalk-labs-alphabets-grand-experiment-in-smart-cities-will-move-forward-in-toronto/
Sinclair K (2019) Smart buildings for the smart city [WWW Document]. Facilitiesnet. https://www.facilitiesnet.com/buildingautomation/contributed/Smart-Buildings-for-the-Smart-City--44852
Soo Z (2018) Forget to leash your dog? Chinese credit scoring system for owners means you could lose your pet [WWW Document]. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/tech/policy/article/2170400/forget-leash-your-dog-chinese-credit-scoring-system-owners-means-you
Staples M, Chen S, Falamaki S, Ponomarev A, Rimba P, Tran AB, Weber I, Xu X, Zhu J (2017) Risks and opportunities for systems using blockchains and smart contracts. Data 61, CSIRO, Sydney
Theodorou S, Sklavos N (2019) Blockchain-based security and privacy in smart cities. In: Smart cities cybersecurity and privacy. Elsevier, pp 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815032-0.00003-2
Thompson D (2019) A tale of two surveillance states [WWW Document]. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/05/the-us-and-china-a-tale-of-two-surveillance-states/590542/
Tranter K (2011a) The law and technology enterprise: uncovering the template to legal scholarship on technology. Law Innov Technol 3:31–83. https://doi.org/10.5235/175799611796399830
Tranter K (2011b) The laws of technology and the technology of law. Griffith Law Rev 20:753–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2011.10854719
Tranter K (2018a) From law and technology to law as technology. In: Living in technical legality : science fiction and law as technology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 17–42
Tranter K (2018b) Living in technical legality: science fiction and law as technology, Edinburgh critical studies in law, literature and humanities. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Tranter K (2002) Terror in the texts: technology—law—future. Law Crit 13:75–99
Wang Q, Zhu X, Ni Y, Gu L, Zhu H (2019) Blockchain for the IoT and industrial IoT: a review. Internet of Things 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100081
Williams EE (2017) CRISPR: redefining GMOS—one edit at a time. Univ Arkansas Little Rock Law Rev 39:460
Yenginsu C (2018) If workers slack off, the Wristband Will Know. (And Amazon has a patent for it.) [WWW Document]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/technology/amazon-wristband-tracking-privacy.html
Yuan Y, Wang F (2016) Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems. In: 2016 IEEE 19th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC). Presented at the 2016 IEEE 19th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp 2663–2668. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795984
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robb, L., Deane, F. (2021). Smart Cities as Panopticon: Highlighting Blockchain’s Potential for Smart Cities Through Competing Narratives. In: Wang, B.T., Wang, C.M. (eds) Automating Cities. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8669-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8670-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)