Abstract
The coherent states are often called as Glauber coherent states and were named after the American Scientist Glauber who was first to realize the extraordinary usefulness of these coherent states for explanation and analysis of many optical phenomena. These states were first introduced by Sudarshan also and are now been extensively studied and applied to quantum-optical problems. The most explicit form of these states are expressed as, \( \left| {\,\alpha \,} \right\rangle = \,\sum\nolimits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}\,\left| {\,\alpha \,} \right|^{2} }} \frac{{\alpha^{n} }}{\sqrt n !}\,\left| {\,n\,} \right\rangle } \) where, the Fock states \( \left| {\,n\,} \right\rangle \) is the eigen state of the number operator \( N = \,a^{{{\dag }}} a \), i.e., \( N\,\left| {\,n\,} \right\rangle = \,n\,\left| {\,n\,} \right\rangle \) and \( \alpha \, = \,\alpha_{r} + \,i\alpha_{i} \) is a complex number. These Glauber coherent states are the eigen states of annihilation operator and are well known. They play a very important role in many applications of quantum information processing including quantum teleportation. But it has been a long dream for physicists to generate these superposed coherent states in the most general desired form \( \left| {\,\psi \,} \right\rangle \, = \,N\,\left( {\cos \,\frac{\theta }{2}\,\left| {\,\alpha \,} \right\rangle \, \pm \sin \,\frac{\theta }{2}\,e^{i\,\varphi } \,\left| { - \alpha \,} \right\rangle \,} \right)\, \) where, N is the normalization factor. In this paper, we propose a scheme to generate any such general superposition of coherent states \( \left| {\,\alpha \,} \right\rangle \) and \( \left| { - \alpha \,} \right\rangle \) using Kerr effect, two beams in coherent states, a single photon beam and optical devices like polarization beam splitter and mirrors. In the output, if a single photon is detected in a polarization state defined by angle \( \theta \) and \( \varphi \), the desired superposition of coherent states \( \left| {\,\alpha \,} \right\rangle \) and \( \left| { - \alpha \,} \right\rangle \) results. If the photon is detected in an orthogonal polarization state (the state in which the electric field strength at a given point in space is normal to the direction of propagation), a superposition state different from the desired one results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963)
R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963)
R.J. Glauber, In quantum optics and electronics. In: C. De Witt, A. Blandin, Cohen Tanaudiji C Gordon and Breach, New York (1965)
E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963)
V. Fock, Z. Phys. 49, 339 (1928)
E. Schrodinger, Phys. Rev. 14, 644 (1927)
B. Yurke, D. Stoler, Phy. Rev. Lett. 57, 13 (1986)
G.J. Milburn, C.A. Holmes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2237 (1986)
E. Schrodinger, Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturewissenschaften 23:807, 823, 844. An English translation of this can be found in Quantum Theory of Measurement, edited by J. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983) (1935)
M.S. Kim, Paternostro M arXiv quant-Ph/0510057 v1
C.C. Gerry, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2479 (1996)
C.M. Savage, W.A. Cheng, Opt. Comm. 70, 439 (1989); N. Qureshi, H. Schmidt, A.R. Hawkins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 431 (2004); N. Qureshi, S.Q. Wang, M.A. Lowther, A.R. Hawkins, S. Kwon, A. Liddle, J. Bokor, Schmidt H. Nano Lett. 5, 1413
P. Tombesi, A. Mecozzi, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1700 (1987); P.R. Cantwell, U.J. Gibson, D.A. Allwood, H.A.M. Macleod, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 093910 (2006)
T. Ogawa, M. Uede, N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. A 43, 6458 (1991)
J.J. Slosser, P. Meystre, E.M. Wright, Opt. Lett. 15, 233 (1990)
J. Banacloche, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5913 (1991)
J.J. Slosser, P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3867 (1990)
P. Meystre, J.J. Slosser, M. Wilkens, Phys. Rev. A 43, 4959 (1991)
M. Wilkens, P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3832 (1991)
A. La Porta, R.E. Slusher, B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 28 (1989)
S. Song, C.M. Caves, B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. A 41, 5261 (1990)
B. Yurke, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 2, 732 (1986)
E.T. Jaynes, E.W. Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963)
S.J.D. Phoenix, P.L. Knight, Ann. Phys. (New York) 186, 381 (1988)
S.J.D. Phoenix, P.L. Knight, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 116 (1990)
J. Gea-Banacloche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3385 (1990)
S.J.D. Phoenix, P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2833 (1991)
B. Yurke, W. Schleich, D.F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 42, 1703 (1990)
J. Eiselt, H. Risken, Opt. Comm. 72, 351 (1989)
V. Buzek, H. Moya-Cessa, P.L. Knight, S.J.D. Phornix, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8190 (1992)
A. Auffeves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 230405 (2003)
M.S. Kim, G.S. Agarwal, J. Mod. Opt. 46, 2111 (1999)
P.K. Pathak, G.S. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. A 71, 043823 (2005)
N. Chandra, H. Prakash, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 9, 688 (1971)
N. Chandra, H. Prakash, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2, 767 (1971)
N. Chandra, H. Prakash, Lett Nuovo Cim 4, 1196 (1970)
N. Chandra, H. Prakash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1068 (1969)
D. Stoler, B.E.A. Saleh, M.C. Teich, Opt. Acta 32, 345 (1985)
Y. Xia, G. Guo, Phys. Lett. A 136, 281 (1989)
D.T. Pegg, S.M. Barnett, J. Mod. Opt. 46, 1657 (1999)
B.C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4284 (1989)
P.L. Knight, V. Buzek, Opt. Comm. 81, 331 (1991)
C.L. Chai, Phys. Rev. A 46, 7187 (1992)
B.C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A 45, 6811 (1992)
C.T. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3374 (1995)
R. Ragi, B. Baseia, V.S. Bagnato, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 1495 (1998)
K. Nemoto, B.C. Sanders, J. Phys. A 34, 2051 (2000)
W. Schleich, M. Pernigo, F.L. Kein, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2172 (1991)
V.V. Dodonov, S.Y. Kalmykov, V.I. Man’ko Phys. Lett. A 199, 123 (1995)
K. Tara, G.S. Agarwal, S. Chaturvedi, Phy. Rev. A 47, 5024 (1993)
H. Jeong, M.S. Kim, J. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052308 (2001)
Christopher C. Gerry, Phy. Rev. A 59, 4095 (1999)
M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3796 (1987)
A. Mecozzi, P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1055 (1987)
H. Prakash, N. Chandra, Phys. Rev. A 9, 2167 (1974)
D.F. Walls, Nature 306, 141 (1983)
R. Loudon, P.L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 34, 709 (1987)
V.V. Dodonov, J. Opt. B 4, R1 (2002)
Acknowledgements
Shivani A. Kumar would like to thank Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh for its support in every way wherever required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kumar, S.A., Prakash, H., Chandra, N., Prakash, R. (2020). Production of Superposition of Coherent States Using Kerr Non Linearity. In: Jain, V.K., Rattan, S., Verma, A. (eds) Recent Trends in Materials and Devices. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 256. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8625-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8625-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8624-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8625-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)