Skip to main content

US and Singapore Teachers’ Views on Teaching History Through Fieldtrips

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fieldwork in Humanities Education in Singapore

Part of the book series: Studies in Singapore Education: Research, Innovation & Practice ((SSERIP,volume 2))

  • 344 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reports the results of a survey of US (n = 65) and Singapore (n = 33) teachers on how they engaged in field-based historical inquiry with their students. In particular, the authors focus on what types of sites teachers selected, their frequency of utilizing field-based teaching, their confidence in engaging students in particular field-based inquiry teaching strategies, and what they viewed as factors that promote or serve as barriers to utilizing field-based inquiry. All the participants had received advanced training in teaching with historical sites either as part of a course (Singapore) or teacher professional development institute (USA). They found that the participants were generally limited to one field-based experience per academic year, with some augmenting these experiences with additional in class or virtual fieldtrips. Sites most often identified include cultural or heritage sites and museums (Singapore) to memorials and historic sites (USA). Overall, the participants were confident in being able to utilize field-based historical inquiry strategies. However, they identified a number of barriers, with the most frequently identified being time (Singapore) and cost (USA). Important implications for teacher educators, administrators, and curriculum developers are explored around the types of sites identified, beliefs about field-based inquiry, and what can be done to promote field-based historical inquiry and reduce barriers to this practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (2nd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugar, K. A. (2012). Thinking beyond fieldtrips: An analysis of museums and social studies learners. Social Studies Research and Practice, 7(2), 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P. K. (2010). Making fieldtrips count: Collaborating for meaningful experiences. The Social Studies, 101, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990903498431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school fieldtrips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman-Peck, L., & Travers, K. (2013). What is distinctive about museum pedagogy and how can museums best support learning in schools? An action research inquiry into the practice of three regional museums. Educational Action Research, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.761924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2004). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. S., Levine, T. H., & Grenier, R. S. (2012). How secondary history teachers use and think about museums: Current practices and untapped promise for promoting historical understanding. Theory and Research in Social Education, 40(1), 66–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.649466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A., Stoddard, J., & Woodward, W. (2017). Teaching history with museums: Strategies for K-12 social studies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, R. (2000). How Americans use and think about the past: Implications from a national survey for the teaching of history. In P. C. Seixas, P. N. Stearns, & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching & learning history (pp. 262–283). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A., & Trofanenko, B. (2014). Encountering pedagogy at the National Museum of the American Indian. In B. Trofanenko & A. Segall (Eds.), Beyond pedagogy: Reconsidering the public purpose of museums (pp. 57–68). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, J. (2018). Learning history beyond school. Museums, public sites and informal education. In S. Metzger & L. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 631–656). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237–248). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. M. (2010). The educational promise of public history museum exhibits. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(2), 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hover, S., & Hicks, D. (2018). History teacher preparation and professional development. In S. Metzger & L. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 391–418). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B., & Maggioni, L. (2016). Epistemic cognition in history. In J. A. Green, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 128–146). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Maley, C., Grenier, R., & Marcus, A. S. (2013). We need to talk: Improving the dialogue between social studies teachers and museum educators. The Social Studies, 104, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.720308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by an international fellowship from the Wendy and Emory Reves Center for International Studies at William & Mary. The authors wish to thank Dr. Mark Baildon and Mr. Chelva Rajah from the National Institute for Education (Nanyang Technological University) for their assistance with this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Stoddard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stoddard, J., Hartley, A., Shy, L., Vo, K. (2021). US and Singapore Teachers’ Views on Teaching History Through Fieldtrips. In: Sim, T.Y., Sim, H.H. (eds) Fieldwork in Humanities Education in Singapore. Studies in Singapore Education: Research, Innovation & Practice, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8232-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8233-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics