Abstract
History pervades public culture and everyday life: through family histories, political discourses, popular culture and media, classroom instruction, museum experiences, and commemorative events. Historical sites such as memorials, museums, and heritage places can be interpretive sites to help students actively participate in public debates about the meaning of the past and how the past is represented. Well-designed historical fieldwork offers students authentic learning experiences in historical investigation and gives them opportunities to more fully consider the “variety of voices in which the echo of the past is heard” (Gadamer in Truth and Method. Continuum, New York, NY, p. 285, 2006). This chapter provides a framework based on the systematic questioning of historical sites to support rigorous fieldwork as a central part of history education to develop students’ historical reasoning skills, conceptual understanding, and knowledge about the past. It focuses on the ways history is represented and how it has been used to communicate meanings about identity (individual and collective)—past, present, and future (Nordgren in Theory Res Soc Educ 44:479–504, 2016). The chapter calls for an interpretive approach to fieldwork to help students think about the ways different historical sites represent the past, the ways they “work” to convey particular pasts, and the different kinds of “readings” that can be done to more critically interrogate these representations. Inquiry-based fieldwork can support this kind of work by scaffolding students to more critically question sites as “representations” of the past and providing them with the means to consider how histories get constructed, for what purposes, and for whom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Activists on quest for civilian war dead memorial. (1999, August 6). CNN.com/US. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/US/9908/06/stonewalkers/.
Afandi, S., Baildon, M., & Rajah, S. N. C. (2014). “Reading” monuments and memorials of war. BeMuse, 7(4), 32–39.
Baildon, M., & Afandi, S. (2017). The myth that a singular historical narrative moulds good citizens. In K. S. Loh, P. J. Thum, & J. M. T. Chia (Eds.), Living with myths: Exploring Singapore’s pasts and futures (pp. 29–39). Singapore: Ethos Books.
Bradshaw, M. (2006). Creating controversy in the classroom: Making progress with historical significance. Teaching History, 125, 18–25.
Cercadillo, L. (2006). Significance in history: Students’ ideas in England and Spain. In A. K. Dickinson, P. J. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), International review of history education: Vol. 3. Raising standards in education (pp. 116–145). London, UK: Woburn Press.
Counsell, C. (2004). Looking through a Josephine Butler-shaped window: Focusing pupils’ thinking on historical significance. Teaching History, 114, 30–36.
Dawson, I. (2003). What is history? Year 7 starter unit for key stage 3. London: Hodder Education.
Dawson, I., & de Pennington, J. (2000). Fieldwork in history teaching and learning. In A. Booth & P. Hyland (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 166–178). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Freire, P. (1983). The importance of the act of reading. Journal of Education, 165(1), 5–11.
Gadamer, H. G. (2006). Truth and method. NY: Continuum.
Hoskins, W. G. (1967). Fieldwork in local history. London: Faber & Faber Ltd.
Japanese shrine courts controversy. (2001, August 13). CNN.com/World. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/08/13/shrine.background/.
Jordanova, L. (2000). History in practice. London: Arnold.
Lee, K. Y. (1967). Prime Minister’s Speech at the Unveiling Ceremony of Memorial to Civilian Victims of the Japanese Occupation on 15th February 1967. Retrieved from http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/lky19670215.pdf.
Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2015). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lindauer, M. (2006). Looking at museum education through the lens of curriculum theory. Introductory remarks for a special issue. Journal of Museum Education, 31(2), 79–80.
Muzaini, H., & Yeoh, B. (2007). Memory-making ‘from below’: Rescaling remembrance at the Kranji War Memorial and Cemetery, Singapore. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1288–1305.
Nordgren, K. (2016). How to do things with history: Use of history as a link between historical consciousness and historical culture. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(4), 479–504.
Partington, G. (1980). The idea of a historical education. Slough: NFER.
Philips, R. (2002). Historical significance—The forgotten “key element”. Teaching History, 96, 14–19.
Segall, A. (2006). What’s the purpose of teaching a discipline, anyway? The case of history. In A. Segall, B. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 125–139). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Seixas, P. (2000). Schweigen! der kinder! Or, does postmodernism in history have a place in the schools? In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 19–37). New York: New York University Press.
Seixas, P., & Clark, P. (2004). Murals as monuments: Students’ ideas about depictions of civilization in British Columbia. American Journal of Education, 110(2), 146–171.
Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson.
Stephens, W. B. (1977). Teaching local history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Trofanenko, B. (2006). Displayed objects, indigenous identities, and public pedagogy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 37(4), 309–327.
VanSledright, B. (2010). What does it mean to think historically … and how do you teach it? In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Social studies today: Research and practice (pp. 113–120). New York, NY: Routledge.
Werner, W. (2002). Reading visual texts. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(3), 401–428.
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willinsky, J. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Afandi, S., Baildon, M. (2021). Historical Fieldwork as Reflection on the Uses of History. In: Sim, T.Y., Sim, H.H. (eds) Fieldwork in Humanities Education in Singapore. Studies in Singapore Education: Research, Innovation & Practice, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8232-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8233-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)