Skip to main content

Historical Fieldwork as Reflection on the Uses of History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fieldwork in Humanities Education in Singapore

Part of the book series: Studies in Singapore Education: Research, Innovation & Practice ((SSERIP,volume 2))

  • 379 Accesses

Abstract

History pervades public culture and everyday life: through family histories, political discourses, popular culture and media, classroom instruction, museum experiences, and commemorative events. Historical sites such as memorials, museums, and heritage places can be interpretive sites to help students actively participate in public debates about the meaning of the past and how the past is represented. Well-designed historical fieldwork offers students authentic learning experiences in historical investigation and gives them opportunities to more fully consider the “variety of voices in which the echo of the past is heard” (Gadamer in Truth and Method. Continuum, New York, NY, p. 285, 2006). This chapter provides a framework based on the systematic questioning of historical sites to support rigorous fieldwork as a central part of history education to develop students’ historical reasoning skills, conceptual understanding, and knowledge about the past. It focuses on the ways history is represented and how it has been used to communicate meanings about identity (individual and collective)—past, present, and future (Nordgren in Theory Res Soc Educ 44:479–504, 2016). The chapter calls for an interpretive approach to fieldwork to help students think about the ways different historical sites represent the past, the ways they “work” to convey particular pasts, and the different kinds of “readings” that can be done to more critically interrogate these representations. Inquiry-based fieldwork can support this kind of work by scaffolding students to more critically question sites as “representations” of the past and providing them with the means to consider how histories get constructed, for what purposes, and for whom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Activists on quest for civilian war dead memorial. (1999, August 6). CNN.com/US. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/US/9908/06/stonewalkers/.

  • Afandi, S., Baildon, M., & Rajah, S. N. C. (2014). “Reading” monuments and memorials of war. BeMuse, 7(4), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baildon, M., & Afandi, S. (2017). The myth that a singular historical narrative moulds good citizens. In K. S. Loh, P. J. Thum, & J. M. T. Chia (Eds.), Living with myths: Exploring Singapore’s pasts and futures (pp. 29–39). Singapore: Ethos Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, M. (2006). Creating controversy in the classroom: Making progress with historical significance. Teaching History, 125, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cercadillo, L. (2006). Significance in history: Students’ ideas in England and Spain. In A. K. Dickinson, P. J. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), International review of history education: Vol. 3. Raising standards in education (pp. 116–145). London, UK: Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counsell, C. (2004). Looking through a Josephine Butler-shaped window: Focusing pupils’ thinking on historical significance. Teaching History, 114, 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, I. (2003). What is history? Year 7 starter unit for key stage 3. London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, I., & de Pennington, J. (2000). Fieldwork in history teaching and learning. In A. Booth & P. Hyland (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 166–178). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1983). The importance of the act of reading. Journal of Education, 165(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2006). Truth and method. NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, W. G. (1967). Fieldwork in local history. London: Faber & Faber Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese shrine courts controversy. (2001, August 13). CNN.com/World. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/08/13/shrine.background/.

  • Jordanova, L. (2000). History in practice. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. Y. (1967). Prime Minister’s Speech at the Unveiling Ceremony of Memorial to Civilian Victims of the Japanese Occupation on 15th February 1967. Retrieved from http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/lky19670215.pdf.

  • Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2015). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, M. (2006). Looking at museum education through the lens of curriculum theory. Introductory remarks for a special issue. Journal of Museum Education, 31(2), 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzaini, H., & Yeoh, B. (2007). Memory-making ‘from below’: Rescaling remembrance at the Kranji War Memorial and Cemetery, Singapore. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1288–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren, K. (2016). How to do things with history: Use of history as a link between historical consciousness and historical culture. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(4), 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, G. (1980). The idea of a historical education. Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, R. (2002). Historical significance—The forgotten “key element”. Teaching History, 96, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2006). What’s the purpose of teaching a discipline, anyway? The case of history. In A. Segall, B. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 125–139). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (2000). Schweigen! der kinder! Or, does postmodernism in history have a place in the schools? In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 19–37). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P., & Clark, P. (2004). Murals as monuments: Students’ ideas about depictions of civilization in British Columbia. American Journal of Education, 110(2), 146–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, W. B. (1977). Teaching local history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2006). Displayed objects, indigenous identities, and public pedagogy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 37(4), 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B. (2010). What does it mean to think historically … and how do you teach it? In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Social studies today: Research and practice (pp. 113–120). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W. (2002). Reading visual texts. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(3), 401–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhaimi Afandi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Afandi, S., Baildon, M. (2021). Historical Fieldwork as Reflection on the Uses of History. In: Sim, T.Y., Sim, H.H. (eds) Fieldwork in Humanities Education in Singapore. Studies in Singapore Education: Research, Innovation & Practice, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8232-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8233-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics