Abstract
Although there is no large-scale and coherent survey available on teacher-guided history fieldtrips in Singapore, recent exploratory case studies have emerged on the use of museums in the teaching of premodern Singapore history. This chapter seeks to locate the efforts of a group of history teachers in the context of collaboration with academic and professional bodies as well as a Networked Learning Community who systematically sought to incorporate museum-based learning and embed such teaching resources in the teaching of ancient Singapore history. Using Activity Theory (AT) as a learning theory to explore these networks of collaboration, the learning networks that were established showed that such approaches could lead to a more effective co-creation of knowledge outcome for practitioner inquiry and have some positive outcomes for student learning. Data was collected from teacher reflections and surveys as a basic unit of analysis and from students to gauge how they benefited from such learning approaches. The analysis of teacher responses showed that there was increased teacher confidence in the teaching of ancient Singapore history, and students derived direct and indirect benefits from a networked system of learning. From the perspective of AT, although the collaborative linkages established between the different institutions (museums, academic institutions, schools, and Ministry of Education) were not bound by any fixed rules, the committed efforts of the Master Teacher and teachers played an important role in setting up norms of collaboration among the different institutions to impact student learning about ancient Singapore.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bertelsen, O. W., & Bødker, S. (2003). Activity theory. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and framewors: Toward an interdisciplinary science. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Chew, E. (2008). Views, values and perceptions in geographical fieldwork in Singapore schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(4), 307–329.
Chee, M. F. (2006). Training teachers for the Effective Use of Museum. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 6(1), 10–16.
Crowley, K., Pierroux, P., & Knutson, K. (2014). Informal Learning in Museums. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 461–478). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engestrom, Y., Puonti, A., & Seppanen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 151-186). New York: Routledge.
MOE (2017). Guide to Effective Professional Development, Volume 3: Networked Learning Community. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/Effective-PD-NLC.
Hollen, D., & Throop, J. (2008). Whatever happened to empathy? Ethos, 36(4), 385–401.
J. Park. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Social Systems surrounding Korean National Museums in the Digital Age. In Museums and the Web Asia 2014, N. Proctor & R. Cherry (Eds.), Silver Spring, MD: Museums and the Web. Published September 29, 2014. Consulted May 22, 2020. https://mwa2014.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/a-conceptual-framework-for-analysing-social-systems-surrounding-korean-national-museums-in-the-digital-age/.
Jackson, D., & Temperley, J. (2007). From professional learning community to networked learning community. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 45–62). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Oh, Y. J. (2018). Historical Evidence: Archaeological Practice as a Pedagogical Tool for Historical Education in Singapore. HSSE Online, 6(2). Retrieved from https://www.hsseonline.edu.sg/journal/volume-7-issue-2-2018/historical-evidence-archaeological-practice-pedagogical-tool on 11 June 2019.
Seixas, D. P., & Morton, T. (2013). The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.
Sim, Teddy. (2015). Exploring sources on pre-modern history of Singapore: Review essay of “Jacques de Coutre’s and Mantelieff’s Singapore and Johor”. HSSE Online, 4(2), 17–35.
Stoddard, J. D. (2018). Learning history beyond school. In S. Metzger & L. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning (pp. 631–51). Hoboken: Wiley.
Nabors, M. L., Edwards, L. C., & Murray, R. K. (2009). Making the case for field trips: what research tells us and what site coordinators have to say. Education, 129(4), 661–667.
National Museum (2017). National Museum resources, Retrieved from https://www.nationalmuseum.sg/-/media/nms2017/documents/school-programmes/teachers-hi-resource-unit-1-precolonial.pdf
Seixas, P., & Moreton, T. (2012). The Big Six: Historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson College.
Smith, M. M. (200). Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smell, Tasting and Touching in History. California: University of California Press.
Heyking, A. V. (2004). Historical Thinking in the Elementary Years: A Review of Current Research. Canadian Social Studies, 39(1). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1073974.pdf.
Rieber, R. W., & Carton, A. S. (Eds). (1987). The collected works of L.S.Vygotsky, Vol 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
Inquiry and Guiding Questions, Museum Learning Program, Learning Intentions, Activities and Sample Survey.
Inquiry Question
-
1.
What can archaeological evidence tell us about the people living in Temasek and the kind of activities they were engaged in, in the 14th century?
Guiding Questions
-
1.
How does archaeology work? What is the archaeological process like?
-
2.
How has human material culture developed over time?
-
3.
What were the kinds of artifacts discovered in Singapore?
-
4.
What do these artifacts tell you about the people living in Temasek in the 14th century?
-
5.
What can you infer about the kind of activities that the people in Temasek were doing in the 14th century?
Museum Learning Program
-
1.
To enable students to have a better understanding of the archaeological process and the work of archaeologists in supporting historians to construct knowledge about Singapore’s early past.
-
2.
To provide students with a broad understanding of the development of human material culture.
-
3.
To provide students with an opportunity for a hands-on experience in handling and studying artifacts.
Learning Intentions
Students will be able to:
-
1.
Classify and sort the sherds/ceramics according to their different types,
-
2.
Identify on the Singapore map where selected artifacts were discovered, and
-
3.
Make inferences about the people living in Singapore and the kind of activities that took place in Singapore in the 14th century, based on the artifacts discovered and the additional contextual information provided.
Activity 1: The Lost Bag of Sherds! Sort the Sherds!
Archaeology involves more than just excavation of sites to search for artifacts. It also involves laboratory work to clean, catalogue, and analyze artifacts.
-
1.
Study the bag of sherds on the table.
-
2.
Sort the sherds into different categories.
-
3.
Use the table that describes the characteristics of the different types of pottery to guide you.
-
4.
Examine the following before sorting them according to the:
-
Texture
-
Color
-
Design
-
-
5.
Explain why you categorize the sherds in those ways.
Activity 2: Plot It on a Map
-
1.
The map shows you three major excavations sites in Singapore:
-
Fort Canning Hill
-
St Andrews’ Cathedral
-
River Area: Empress Place / Parliament House Complex / Old Parliament House / Padang
-
-
2.
Archaeologists discovered various artifacts in these three areas and more is written about them in the cards.
-
3.
Study the pictures of artifacts and the additional information given to you.
-
4.
Sort the artifacts according to where they were discovered in Singapore.
-
5.
Plot these artifacts on the map.
Courtesy of J. Miksic and the National Museum of Singapore, National Heritage Board.
Courtesy of Singapore Land Authority (SLA) (One Map).
-
6.
Look for two or three other artifacts that were discovered in Singapore from the Archaeology Library (not mentioned in the pictures) and then plot them on the map.
-
7.
Map your activity and then answer the following questions:
-
What was life like for people who lived in the different areas in Ancient Singapore?
-
What evidence supports your argument?
-
Sample Survey: Survey on the learning of Ancient Singapore and sherd handling
-
1.
Write down five key words about what you learned in chapters 1 and 2 on Temasek Singapore.
-
2.
Did you know about Temasek Singapore (Temasek) before you study it in school? Yes/No
-
3.
What did you know about Temasek Singapore?
-
4.
How did you know about Temasek Singapore then?
-
5.
What did you like about the trips to the museums?
-
6.
Write down three to five key words about what you have learned at the Asian Civilisations Museum (ACM)?
-
7.
How did going to the NUS Museum help you better understand Temasek Singapore?
-
8.
Can you make a suggestion to improve learning at the museums?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yeo, L., Samsudin, S.L., Heng, C., Sani, E.b., Sim, T.Y.H. (2021). A Case Study on the Incorporation of Museum and Artifact-Based Fieldtrips in the Teaching of Ancient Singapore History: Teacher Reflections and Student Learning. In: Sim, T.Y., Sim, H.H. (eds) Fieldwork in Humanities Education in Singapore. Studies in Singapore Education: Research, Innovation & Practice, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8233-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8232-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8233-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)