Skip to main content

Abstract

In India, marine fish production is achieved through capture fisheries and mariculture- culturing of finfish, shellfish, seaweed, etc., in the sea. Increasing protein demand has to be met through increased marine fish production. As marine capture fisheries is in a stagnating phase, the additional fish production has to be achieved through mariculture. Technologies like cage farming and seaweed farming are being promoted by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) for more than a decade. These interventions assisted in enhancing the marine fish production and income of the fishers. One of the anticipated issues while expanding sea cage farming is the increased organic and inorganic load in the water and consequent disease problems. In this context, the concept of bio-mitigation along with increased biomass production can be adopted by integrating different groups of commercially important aquatic species that are having varied feeding habits. This concept is known as Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA). The environmental and economic stability and social acceptability is ensured through IMTA. The ICAR-CMFRI has successfully demonstrated IMTA under participatory mode with a fishermen group by integrating seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii with cage farming of Cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Through demonstration, the total seaweed produced under IMTA was 2.2 times higher than the control. Similarly, the cobia yield was 1.3 times higher than the control. Additionally, the total amount of carbon sequestered into farmed seaweed was 2.2 times higher than the control. At present in adoption stage, the total seaweed produced under IMTA was 3.1 times higher than the control. Integration of seaweed with cobia cages favorably generates additional revenue and is efficient in reducing both organic and inorganic matter from unutilized feed and excreta and thereby ensuring ecological balances. It is also one of the significant mitigating measures on the adverse impact of climate change and earns carbon credit to our country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chopin T (2006) Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. What it is and why you should care … and don’t confuse it with polyculture. North Aquac 12(4):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopin T (2008) Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) will also have its place when aquaculture moves to the open ocean. Fish Farm 31(2):40–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopin T (2013a) Aquaculture, integrated multi-trophic (IMTA). In: Christou P, Savin R, Costa-Pierce B, Misztal I, Whitelaw B (eds) Sustainable food production. Springer, New York, pp 184–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chopin T (2013b) Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: ancient, adaptable concept focuses on ecological integration. Glob Aquac Advocate:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • CMFRI, Kochi (2016) CMFRI annual report 2015–2016. Technical report. CMFRI, Kochi

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang JG, Tang Q, Li Z, Liu J, De Silva SS (2018) Aquaculture in China: success stories and modern trends. Wiley, London, p 667

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2008) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Handå A, Ranheim A, Olsen AJ, Altin D, Reitan KI, Olsen Y, Reinertsen H (2012) Incorporation of salmon fish feed and faeces components in mussel (Mytilus edulis): implications for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in cool-temperate North Atlantic waters. Aquaculture 370–371:40–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Israel A, Einav R, Seckbach J (2010) Seaweeds and their role in globally changing environments, XXVII, p 480

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang ZJ, Fang JG, Mao YZ, Wang W (2010) Eutrophication assessment and bioremediation strategy in a marine fish cage culture area in Nansha Bay, China. J Appl Phycol 22(4):421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Gopakumar G (2011) Farming of the seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii in Tamil Nadu coast - status and constraints. Mar Fish Inf Serv 208:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Narayanakumar R, Abdul Nazar AK, Kaladharan P, Gopakumar G (2017) Economic analysis of farming and wild collection of seaweeds in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu. Indian J Fish 64(4):94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Abdul Nazar A, Jayakumar R, Jayakumar R, Tamilmani G, Sakthivel M, Rameshkumar P, Gopakumar G, Zacharia P (2019) Adoption of sea cage farming of cobia (Rachycentron canadum) by fishermen self-help groups as a diversified livelihood option: a success story from Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu. Indian J Fish. https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2019.66.3.67515-15

  • Tang QS, Fang JG (2012) Review of climate change effects in the Yellow Sea large marine ecosystem and adaptive actions in ecosystem based management. Larg Mar Ecosyst 17:170–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JH, Wu T, Gao YP, Tang W (2013) Feeding behavior of 5 species filter-feeding bivalves on Paralichthys olivaceus feed, faecal and sediment particulates in cage farming area. J Fish China 37(5):727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the Director of CMFRI for his guidance and support. The demonstration was conducted with financial support from the National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project of the ICAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johnson, B. et al. (2021). Climate Resilient Mariculture Technologies for Food and Nutritional Security. In: Venkatramanan, V., Shah, S., Prasad, R. (eds) Exploring Synergies and Trade-offs between Climate Change and the Sustainable Development Goals . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7301-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics