Skip to main content

Impact of Acoustic Signal on Optical Signal and Vice Versa in Optoacoustic Based Underwater Localization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 11th National Technical Seminar on Unmanned System Technology 2019 (NUSYS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 666))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1230 Accesses

Abstract

Underwater localization is an important process in order to determine the approximate location of a deployed underwater tool such as different types of underwater vehicle. A common underwater localization depends on acoustic signal, but it has disadvantages of high development cost, slow propagation speed, high attenuation and only works effectively at a long distance. Optic is an alternative approach for underwater localization. Optical signal has advantages of low cost and high propagation speed, but it has the disadvantage of shorter detection range compared to an acoustic signal. A combination of both approaches is known as an optoacoustic which eliminates the disadvantages of each individual approach and can be used for both short and long distance localizations. However, since both signals are travelling waves, the use of both signals simultaneously may introduce interferences. This paper investigates this possibility through experimentation. The results of investigation proved that the interference does exist when both signals are used simultaneously underwater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saeed N, Celik A, Al-Naffouri TY, Alouini M-S (2019) Underwater optical wireless communications, networking, and localization: a survey. Ad Hoc Netw 94:101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.101935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll P, Zhou S, Zhou H, Xu X, Cui J-H, Willett P (2012) Underwater localization and tracking of physical systems. J Electr Comput Eng 2012:11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/683919

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Paull L, Saeedi S, Seto M, Li H (2014) AUV navigation and localization: a review. IEEE J Ocean Eng 39(1):131–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2013.2278891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Esslinger D, Rapp P, Wiertz S, Rendich H, Marsden R, Sawodny O, Tarín C (2019) Accurate optoacoustic and inertial 3-D pose tracking of moving objects with particle filtering. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2019.2905749

  5. Shen C, Guo Y, Oubei HM, Ng TK, Liu G, Park K-H, Ho K-T, Alouini M-S, Ooi BS (2016) 20-meter underwater wireless optical communication link with 1.5 Gbps data rate. Opt Express 24(22):25502–25509. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu T-C, Chi Y-C, Wang H-Y, Tsai C-T, Lin G-R (2017) Blue laser diode enables underwater communication at 124 Gbps. Sci Rep 7:40480. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou T, Hu S, Mi L, Zhu X, Chen W (2017) A long-distance underwater laser communication system with photon-counting receiver. In: 2017 16th international conference on optical communications and networks (ICOCN), 7–10 August 2017, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shan X, Yang C, Chen Y, Xia Q (2017) A free-space underwater laser communication device with high pulse energy and small volume. In: OCEANS 2017, Anchorage, 18–21 September 2017, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stefano B, Marco C, Silvia G, Ivan S (2013) Advances in underwater acoustic networking. In: Mobile ad hoc networking: the cutting edge directions. IEEE, pp 804–852

    Google Scholar 

  10. Han X, Peng Y, Zhang Y, Ma Z, Wang J (2015) Research on the attenuation characteristics of some inorganic salts in seawater, vol. 10

    Google Scholar 

  11. deir’Erba R, Moriconi C (2015) High power leds in localization of underwater robotics swarms. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(10):117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu S, Zhou P, Yang C, Zhu Y, Zhi H (2019) A novel approach for underwater vehicle localization and communication based on laser reflection. Sensors 19(10):2253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vila AP (2018) 3D underwater SLAM using sonar and laser sensors. University of Girona

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farrant D, Burke J, Dickinson L, Fairman P, Wendoloski J (2010) Opto-acoustic underwater remote sensing (OAURS) - an optical sonar? In: OCEANS 2010 IEEE SYDNEY, 24–27 May 2010, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Esslinger D, Rapp P, Wiertz S, Sawodny O, Tarín C (2018) Highly accurate 3D pose estimation for economical opto-acoustic indoor localization. In: 2018 15th international conference on control, automation, robotics and vision (ICARCV), 18–21 November 2018, pp 1984–1990

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brelet Y, Jarnac A, Carbonnel J, André Y-B, Mysyrowicz A, Houard A, Fattaccioli D, Guillermin R, Sessarego J-P (2015) Underwater acoustic signals induced by intense ultrashort laser pulse. J Acoust Soc Am 137(4):EL288–EL292. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4914998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Campos R, Gracias N, Palomer A, Ridao P (2015) Global alignment of a multiple-robot photomosaic using opto-acoustic constraints. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(2):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boudhane M, Nsiri B (2017) Fish tracking using acoustical and optical data fusion in underwater environment. Paper presented at the proceedings of the international conference on watermarking and image processing, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vasilescu I, Kotay K, Rus D, Dunbabin M, Corke P (2005) Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 3rd international conference on embedded networked sensor systems, San Diego, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lagudi A, Bianco G, Muzzupappa M, Bruno F (2016) An alignment method for the integration of underwater 3D data captured by a stereovision system and an acoustic camera. Sensors 16(4):536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar ML, Rani MJ (2019) A design of novel hybrid opto-acoustic modem for underwater communication. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng (IJITEE) 8(8):7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS). Account No.: 1001/PELECT/6071346.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Arshad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arshad, M.R., Majid, M.H.A. (2021). Impact of Acoustic Signal on Optical Signal and Vice Versa in Optoacoustic Based Underwater Localization. In: Md Zain, Z., et al. Proceedings of the 11th National Technical Seminar on Unmanned System Technology 2019 . NUSYS 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 666. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5281-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics