Abstract
Subculture refers to a relatively diffused social network of shared identity, distinctive meanings around certain ideas, practices and objects. It emerges from a sense of marginalization from or resistance to perceived norms and conventions of a society. As compared to dominant and mainstream classroom cultures imposed and reinforced by schools or teachers, subcultures—constructed by students—may sometimes seem weird, childish, untamed or silly. Hence, subcultures are seldom taken seriously and deemed to disappear as students mature. In this chapter, I aim to: (1) introduce the concept of subculture, which is rarely discussed in the science education literature, to take a more nuanced approach towards the cultural studies of science education research; (2) demonstrate how an analysis of power relationships can contribute to the understanding of subculture in science classrooms. The theoretical framework used to examine subculture is symbolism interactionism. I analyzed a science lesson in a lower track classroom for the interplay of power between the teacher and students to illuminate the subculture of the science class. Specifically, teacher dominance, student dominance, and balance power play were identified. The subculture was shaped by the power play of the social agents and it was aggregative. The findings have implications for science teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Boren, M. E. (2001). Student resistance: A history of the unruly subject. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53(3), 253–273.
Fiske, J. (1992). The cultural economy of Fandom. In Lisa A. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media. London: Routledge.
Giroux, H. A. (1986). Authority, intellectuals, and the politics of practical learning. Teachers College Record, 88(1), 22–40.
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: First Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1975). Frame analysis. London: Penguin Books.
Haenfler, R. (2014). Subcultures: The basics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Higginbotham, E. (1996). Getting all students to listen: Analyzing and coping with student resistance. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(2), 203–211.
Kinsella, S. (1998). Japanese subculture in the 1990s: Otaku and the amateur manga movement. Journal of Japanese Studies, 24(2), 289–316.
Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University, 47(1), viii, 223.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McFarland, D. A. (2001). Student resistance: How the formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 612–678.
Tan, K. C. D., Teo, T. W., & Poon, C.-L. (2016). Singapore science education. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 155–174). Singapore: Springer.
Teo, T. W., & Liu, W. L. (2018, June). We “own” the teachers: An analysis of students’ and teachers’ interpretations of power play in the lower track science classroom. Paper presented at Australian Science Education Research Association, Gold Coast, Australia.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Programme (OER 10/16 TTW) and administered by the National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teo, T.W. (2020). An Analysis of Power Play in the Subculture of Lower Track Science Classrooms. In: Teo, T.W., Tan, AL., Ong, Y.S. (eds) Science Education in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5154-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5155-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)