Skip to main content

An Analysis of Power Play in the Subculture of Lower Track Science Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Education in the 21st Century

Abstract

Subculture refers to a relatively diffused social network of shared identity, distinctive meanings around certain ideas, practices and objects. It emerges from a sense of marginalization from or resistance to perceived norms and conventions of a society. As compared to dominant and mainstream classroom cultures imposed and reinforced by schools or teachers, subcultures—constructed by students—may sometimes seem weird, childish, untamed or silly. Hence, subcultures are seldom taken seriously and deemed to disappear as students mature. In this chapter, I aim to: (1) introduce the concept of subculture, which is rarely discussed in the science education literature, to take a more nuanced approach towards the cultural studies of science education research; (2) demonstrate how an analysis of power relationships can contribute to the understanding of subculture in science classrooms. The theoretical framework used to examine subculture is symbolism interactionism. I analyzed a science lesson in a lower track classroom for the interplay of power between the teacher and students to illuminate the subculture of the science class. Specifically, teacher dominance, student dominance, and balance power play were identified. The subculture was shaped by the power play of the social agents and it was aggregative. The findings have implications for science teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boren, M. E. (2001). Student resistance: A history of the unruly subject. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53(3), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (1992). The cultural economy of Fandom. In Lisa A. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1986). Authority, intellectuals, and the politics of practical learning. Teachers College Record, 88(1), 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: First Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1975). Frame analysis. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenfler, R. (2014). Subcultures: The basics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, E. (1996). Getting all students to listen: Analyzing and coping with student resistance. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(2), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, S. (1998). Japanese subculture in the 1990s: Otaku and the amateur manga movement. Journal of Japanese Studies, 24(2), 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University, 47(1), viii, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. A. (2001). Student resistance: How the formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 612–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D., Teo, T. W., & Poon, C.-L. (2016). Singapore science education. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 155–174). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. W., & Liu, W. L. (2018, June). We “own” the teachers: An analysis of students’ and teachers’ interpretations of power play in the lower track science classroom. Paper presented at Australian Science Education Research Association, Gold Coast, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Programme (OER 10/16 TTW) and administered by the National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tang Wee Teo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teo, T.W. (2020). An Analysis of Power Play in the Subculture of Lower Track Science Classrooms. In: Teo, T.W., Tan, AL., Ong, Y.S. (eds) Science Education in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5155-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5154-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5155-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics