Abstract
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that is produced in many sectors. Agriculture and, more specifically, livestock contribute to this phenomenon. Methane is produced as a result of fermentation in the rumen of dairy cows with a significant amount of gas being released in the atmosphere via the mouth of ruminants. The total intake is the main factor influencing methane production followed by digestibility, fat, and the amount of fibre in the diet. Many strategies exist to reduce methane emissions such as chemicals, essential oils, and the red macroalgae in the diet of dairy cows. The majority of these strategies are either expensive or not feasible to use in a long-term period of time since the microbes in the rumen will adapt to this change. There is a wide range of methods and tools to measure methane emissions both in vitro and in vivo. The respiration chamber is the golden method to measure and quantify the fluxes (methane emissions) in dairy cows. In some cases where measurements of methane are impossible, vitro techniques together with modelling approaches could be used to predict methane emissions. Empirical and mechanistic modelling is a technique widely used to predict methane emissions. In this case by knowing some feed and animal characteristics methane could be reliably estimated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed M (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions and climate variability: an overview. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of climate variability, adaptation and mitigation for agricultural sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_1
Ahmed M, Ahmad S, Waldrip HM, Ramin M, Raza MA (2020) Whole farm modeling: a systems approach to understanding and managing livestock for greenhouse gas mitigation, economic viability and environmental quality. In: Waldrip H, Pagliari P, He Z (eds) Animal manure. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub67.c25
Axelsson J (1949) The amount of produced methane energy in the European metabolic experiments with adult cattle. Ann R Agric Coll Sweden 16:404–418
Bayat AR, Tapio I, Vilkki J et al (2018) Plant oil supplements reduce methane emissions and improve milk fatty acid composition in dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets without affecting milk yield. J Dairy Sci 101:1136–1151
Bell M, Eckard R, Moate PJ, Yan T (2016) Modelling the effect of diet composition on enteric methane emissions across sheep, beef cattle and dairy cows. Animals 54:1–16
Benchaar C, Greathead H (2011) Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166:338–355
Chagas et al (2019) In vitro evaluation of different dietary methane mitigation strategies. In: Udén P, Eriksson T, Spörndly R et al (eds) 10th Nordic feed science conference, Uppsala July 2019. SLU Repro, Uppsala, p 62
Crutzen PJ (1995) Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction. In: Engelhardt WV et al (eds) The role of Methane in atmospheric chemistry and climate. Ventura, pp 291–313
Czerkawski JW (1986) An introduction to rumen studies. Robert Maxwell MC, Oxford
Danfaer A, Huhtanen P, Udén P (2006) The Nordic dairy cow model, Karoline-description. In: Kebreab E, Dijkstra J, Bannink A et al (eds) Nutrient digestion and utilization in farm animals. Modeling approaches. CABI publishing, Wallingford, p 383
Danielsson R, Ramin M, Bertilsson J et al (2017) Evaluation of an in vitro system for predicting methane production in vivo. J Dairy Sci 100:8881–8894
Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odongo NE et al (2007) Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. J Dairy Sci 90:3456–3466
Fant P, Ramin M, Jaakkola S et al (2020) Effects of different barley and oat varieties on methane production, digestibility and fermentation pattern in vitro. J Dairy Sci In press
Franco MO et al (2017) In vitro evaluation of agro-industrial by-products replacing soybean meal in two different basal diets for ruminants. In: Udén P, Eriksson T, Spörndly R et al (eds) 8th Nordic feed science conference, Uppsala July 2017. SLU Repro, Uppsala, p 170613
Grainger C, Beauchemin KA (2011) Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167:308–320
Howarth RW (2019) Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? Biogeosciences 16:3033–3046
Hristov AN, Oh J, Giallongo F et al (2015) An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:10663–10668
Huhtanen P, Ramin M, Udén P (2015) Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 1. Model description and sensitivity analysis. Livest Sci 178:71–80
Immig I (1996) The rumen and hindgut as source of ruminant methanogenesis. Environ Monit Assess 42:57–72
Jentsch W, Schweigel M, Weissbach F, Scholze H, Pitroff W, Derno M (2007) Methane production in cattle calculated by the nutrient composition of the diet. Arch Anim Nutr 61:10–19
Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492
Kiehl JT, Trenberth KE (1997) Earth’s annual global mean energy budget. Bull Am Meteorol 78:197–208
Lassey KR (2007) Livestock methane emission: from the individual grazing animal through national inventories to the global methane cycle. Agric For Meteorol 142:120–132
Lesschen JP, van den Berg M, Westhoek HJ et al (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167:16–28
Machado L, Magnusson M, Paul NA et al (2014) Effects of marine and freshwater macroalgae on in vitro total gas and methane production. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085289
Machado L, Magnusson M, Paul NA et al (2016) Identification of bioactives from the red seaweed Asparagopsis taxiformis that promote antimethanogenic activity in vitro. J Appl Phycol 28:3117–3126
McAllister TA, Okine EK, Mathison GW et al (1996) Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Can J Anim Sci 76:31–243
McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM et al (2011) Greenhouse gases in animal agriculture. Finding a balance between food production and emissions. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166-167:1–6
Miller TL, Wolin MJ, Zhao H et al (1986) Characteristics of methanogens isolated from bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:201–202
Mills JAN, Dijkstra J, Bannink A et al (2001) A mechanistic model of whole-tract digestion and methanogenesis in the lactating dairy cow: model development, evaluation, and application. J Anim Sci 79:1584–1597
Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C et al (2010) Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4:1024–1036
Moss AR, Givens DI, Garnsworthy PC (1995) The effect of supplementing grass silage with barley on digestibility, in sacco degradability, rumen fermentation and methane production in sheep at two levels of intake. Anim Feed Sci Technol 55:9–33
Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J (2000) Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 49:231–253
Niu M, Kebreab E, Hristov AN et al (2018) Enteric methane production, yield and intensity prediction models of various complexity levels using a global database. Glob Chang Biol 24:3368–3389
Petrenko VV, Smith AM, Schaefer H et al (2017) Minimal geological methane emissions during the Younger Dryas–Preboreal abrupt warming event. Nature 548:443–446
Ramin M, Huhtanen P (2012) Development of an in vitro method for determination of methane production kinetics using a fully automated in vitro gas system – a modelling approach. Anim Feed Sci Technol 174:190–200
Ramin M, Huhtanen P (2013) Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. J Dairy Sci 96:2476–2493
Ramin M, Huhtanen P (2015) Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 2. Model evaluation. Livest Sci 178:81–93
Shindell D (2015) The social cost of atmospheric release. Clim Chang 130:313–326
Stefenoni H, Räisänen S, Melgar A et al (2019) Dose-response effect of the macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis on enteric methane emission in lactating dairy cows. Paper presented at the American Dairy Science Association, Ohio, 23–26 June 2019
St-Pierre NR (2001) Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. J Dairy Sci 84:741–755
Thorpe A (2009) Enteric fermentation and ruminant eructation: the role (and control?) of methane in the climate change debate. Clim Chang 93:407–431
Zhang DF, Yang HJ (2011) In vitro ruminal methanogenesis of a hay-rich substrate in response to different combination supplements of nitrocompounds; pyromellitic diimide and 2-bromoethanesulphonate. Anim Feed Sci Technol 163:20–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramin, M., Chagas, J.C., Krizsan, S.J. (2020). Methane Production in Dairy Cows, Inhibition, Measurement, and Predicting Models. In: Ahmed, M. (eds) Systems Modeling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4727-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4728-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)