Abstract
This chapter complements the previous chapter by demonstrating other nuances of cultural capital. It continues the review of the extant literature where researchers have taken advantage of the rich data on cultural capital and students’ academic achievement in PISA datasets to examine research questions pertaining to how different aspects of cultural capital are associated with students’ reading, mathematics, and science achievement. More specifically, it discusses results from published studies harnessing PISA data demonstrating how cultural capital levels and effects may vary across groups of students with various characteristics. These characteristics are namely, gender gaps and cross-national gaps in student achievement. In particular, cross-national attributes are exemplified by the degree of masculinity and Confucian values, and socioeconomic gradients of countries. Results from these studies underscore the moderating influences of student-and societal-level factors in the cultural capital-student achievement relationship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007/2008). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.51.4.2.
Brozo, W. G., Sulkunen, S., Shiel, G., Garbe, C., Pandian, A., & Valtin, R. (2014). Reading, gender, and engagement: Lessons from five PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(7), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.291.
Byun, S.-Y., Schofer, E., & Kim, K.-K. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 219–239.
Caro, D. H., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., & Ludtke, O. (2013). Cultural, social, and economic capital constructs in international assessments: An evaluation using exploratory structural equation modelling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 433–450.
Chan, S.-M., Bowes, J., & Wyver, S. (2009). Chinese parenting in Hong Kong: Links among goals, beliefs and styles. Early Child Development and Care, 179(7), 849–862.
Chiu, M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: High school students in 41 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592.
Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362.
Dennis, D. (2000). The role of historical studies in mathematics and science educational research. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 799–814). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Edgerton, J. D., Roberts, L. W., & Peter, T. (2013). Disparities in academic achievement: Assessing the role of habitus and practice. Social Indicators Research, 114, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0147-0.
French, J., French, A., & Li, W.-X. (2015). The relationship among cultural dimensions, education expenditure, and PISA performance. International Journal of Educationa Development, 42, 25–34.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2017). School resources and student achievement: A review of cross-country economic research. In M. Rosen, K. Y. Hansen, & U. Wolff (Eds.), Cognitive abilities and educational outcomes: A festschrift in honour of Jan-Eric Gustafsson (pp. 149–171). Cham: Springer.
Hartas, D. (2015). Patterns of parental involvement in selected OECD countries: Cross-national analyses of PISA. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.4.4.185.
Heyneman, S., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194.
Ker, H. W. (2016). The impacts of student, teacher- and school-level factors on mathematics achievement: An exploratory comparative investigation of Singaporean students and the USA students. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 254–276.
Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Lee, J. (2014). Universal factors of student achievement in high-performing Eastern and Western countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 364–374.
Li, Y., Costanzo, P., & Putallaz, M. (2010). Maternal socialization goals, parenting styles, and social-emotional adjustment among Chinese and European American young adults: Testing a mediation model. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(4), 330–362.
Little, A., & Rolleston, C. (2014). School quality counts: Evidence from developing countries. Oxford Review of Education, 40(1), 1–9.
Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. Retrieved March 11, 2019, from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/social%20sector/our%20insights/how%20the%20worlds%20most%20improved%20school%20systems%20keep%20getting%20better/how_the_worlds_most_improved_school_systems_keep_getting_better.ashx.
Rutkowski, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2013). Measuring socioeconomic background in PISA: One size might not fit all. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 259–278.
Sebastian, J., Moon, J.-M., & Cunningham, M. (2017). The relationship of school-based parental involvement with student achievement: A comparison of principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. Educational Studies, 43(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1248900.
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Sun, M.-T. (2011). Educational research in Mainland China: Current situation and Developmental trends. Comparative Education, 47(3), 315–325.
Tan, C. Y. (2013). Organizational legitimacy of the Singapore Ministry of Education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 590–608.
Tan, C. Y. (2015). The contribution of cultural capital to students’ mathematics achievement in medium and high socioeconomic gradient economies. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1050–1067.
Tan, C. Y. (2017a). Conceptual diversity, moderators, and theoretical issues in quantitative studies of cultural capital theory. Educational Review, 69(5), 600–619.
Tan, C. Y. (2017b). Examining cultural capital and student achievement: Results of a meta-analytic review. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(2), 139–159.
Tan, C. Y. (2018). Socioeconomic status, involvement practices, and student science achievement: Insights from a typology of home and school involvement patterns. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 899–924.
Tan, C. Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Information technology, mathematics achievement, and educational equity in developed economies. Educational Studies, 43(4), 371–390.
Tan, C. Y., & Hew, K. F. (2018). The impact of digital divides on student mathematics achievement in Confucian heritage cultures: A critical examination using PISA 2012 data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Tan, C. Y., & Liu, D. (2018). What is the influence of cultural capital on student reading achievement in Confucian as compared to non-Confucian heritage societies? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(6), 896–914.
Wang, Y., Harding, R., & Mai, L.-W. (2012). Impact of cultural exposure on young Chinese students’ adaptation in a UK business school. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 621–639.
Willms, J. D. (2002). Ten hypotheses about socioeconomic gradients and community differences in children’s developmental outcomes. Quebec, Canada: Human Resources Development.
Willms, J. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1008–1037.
Zhang, L., Khan, G., & Tahirsylaj, A. (2015). Student performance, school differentiation, and world cultures: Evidence from PISA 2009. International Journal of Educational Development, 42, 43–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tan, C.Y. (2020). Comparing Cultural Capital Across Groups and Countries. In: Family Cultural Capital and Student Achievement. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4491-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4491-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4490-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4491-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)