Abstract
In the schematics of chapter arrangement, the positioning of this chapter is to create useful imagery about an already established relevance of Foucault’s work to the conceptual frame of paradox and to suggest important support for what lies ahead. His work is here treated as exceeding the complementarity of its application in Chap. 2 to be considered epistemologically crucial to arguments made in the chapters which follow. The theoretical resources discussed in this chapter – built around the central concept of governmentality – are predominantly directed to my analysis of policy discourses of neoliberalism in Chap. 4 and the construction and representation of field data using paradox in Chaps. 6, 7 and 8. The deployment of Foucault’s tools of problematisation and critique is held over until Chap. 4, when they are used to both inform and illuminate a struggle for the ‘soul’ of the principal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This shift to ‘technologies of the self’ garners support from Connolly’s (2002) insistence that ‘one needs to examine established tactics of self-identity … by exploring the means by which one has become constituted as what one is, by probing the structures that maintain the plausibility of those configurations, and by analyzing from a perspective that problematizes the certainty of one’s self-identity the effects these structures and tactics have on others’ (p. 9–10) . Connolly brings a ‘Foucaultian care for identity and difference’ (in conjunction with a Nietzschean affirmation of the ‘abundance of life’) to what he terms an ‘ethic of cultivation’ (p. 10–11).
- 2.
‘Subjectivation’ (sometimes translated as ‘subjectivisation’) is a word coined by Foucault and used in his post-1981 writings, to refer to ‘the process by which one obtains the constitution of a subject, or more exactly, of a subjectivity’ (Foucault, 1988a, p. 253). In his earlier writings, Foucault gave the existing French word assujettissement a similar meaning.
- 3.
The notion of ‘counter-conduct’ emerges in Foucault’s (2007) Security, Territory, Population as he rethinks the problem of resistance inside of a governmentality frame. At its core, counter-conduct is ‘the struggle in order to claim and obtain an other conduct’ (Lorenzini, 2016, p. 11 italics in original). Counter-conduct is given more extensive explanation in Chap. 5.
- 4.
In the introduction to Hunter’s renowned text Rethinking the School (1994), editor Meghan Morris describes Hunter’s understanding of ‘pastoral pedagogy’ in the school setting as concerned with ‘the arts of self-examination’ and ‘care of individual souls’ (p. vii).
References
Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.
Bailey, P. L. J. (2013). The policy dispositif: Historical formation and method. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 807–827.
Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class the selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
Bardon, T., & Josserand, E. (2011). A Nietzschean reading of Foucauldian thinking: Constructing a project of the self within an ontology of becoming. Organization, 18(4), 497–515.
Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy. Political Theory, 27(1), 65–84.
Biesta, G. (2008). Toward a new ‘logic’ of emancipation: Foucault and Rancière. Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 169–177.
Butin, D. W. (2001). If this is resistance I would hate to see domination: Retrieving Foucault’s notion of resistance within educational research. Educational Studies, 32(2), 157–176.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2015). Making policy move: Towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Connolly, W. E. (2002). Identity, difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London: Verso.
Dean, M. (2002). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Fairhurst, G. T. (2009). Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62(11), 1607–1633.
Flew, T. (2012). Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and contemporary neo-liberalism debates. Thesis Eleven, 108(1), 44–65.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1977a). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1977b). Theatrum philosophicum. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 165–196). New York: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1, an introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1980a). Confessions of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 194–228). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1980b). Power and strategies. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 134–145). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1980c). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–77 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1980d). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48–78). London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.
Foucault, M. (1988a). The return of morality. In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984 (pp. 242–254). London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1988b). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (2000a). The masked philosopher (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 321–328). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2000b). Polemics, politics and problematizations (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 111–120). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2000c). Sexuality and solitude (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 175–184). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity press.
Gillies, D. (2013). Educational leadership and Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.
Grant, J. (2010). Foucault and the logic of dialectics. Contemporary Political Theory, 9(2), 220–238.
Hacking, I. (1986). Self-improvement. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 235–240). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2011). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 109–133.
Leask, I. (2012). Beyond subjection: Notes on the later Foucault and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(s1), 57–73.
Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64.
Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. London: Routledge.
Lorenzini, D. (2016). From counter-conduct to critical attitude: Michel Foucault and the art of not being governed quite so much. Foucault Studies, (21), 7–21.
McNay, L. (2009). Self as enterprise dilemmas of control and resistance in Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 55–77.
Morley, L., & Rassool, N. (2002). School effectiveness: Fracturing the discourse. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Nicoll, K., & Fejes, A. (2008). Mobilizing Foucault in studies of lifelong learning. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning: Governing the subject (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.
Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. London: Routledge.
Oksala, J. (2013). From biopower to governmentality. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 320–336). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213–230.
Orr, J. (2010). The ‘soul of the citizen,’ the invention of the social: Governing mentalities. In J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M.-C. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 547–556). New York: Routledge.
Peters, M., & Besley, T. (2007). Why Foucault?: New directions in educational research. New York: Peter Lang.
Pickett, B. L. (1996). Foucault and the politics of resistance. Polity, 28(4), 445–466.
Pignatelli, F. (2002). Mapping the terrain of a Foucauldian ethics: A response to the surveillance of schooling. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(2), 157–180.
Protevi, J. (2009). What does Foucault think is new about neo-liberalism? Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 21, 1–25.
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.
Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. S. (2003). The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984. New York: New Press.
Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. S., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83–104.
Rouse, J. (2006). Power/knowledge. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault (2nd ed., pp. 95–122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schwan, S., & Shapiro, S. (2011). How to read Foucault’s ‘discipline and punish’. London: Pluto Press.
Simons, J. (2013). Power, resistance, and freedom. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 301–318). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Skinner, D. (2012). Foucault, subjectivity and ethics: Towards a self-forming subject. Organization, 20(6), 904–923.
Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133–147.
Stevens, P. (1996). The political ways of paradox: Renaissance literature and modern criticism. English Literary Renaissance, 26(2), 203–224.
Stickney, J. A. (2012). Judging teachers: Foucault, governance and agency during education reforms. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 649–662.
Veyne, P., Porter, C., & Davidson, A. I. (1993). The final Foucault and his ethics. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 1–9.
Wright, A. (2012). Fantasies of empowerment: Mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 279–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dolan, C. (2020). Governing the Soul: The Theoretical Support of Michel Foucault. In: Paradox and the School Leader. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3086-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3086-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3085-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3086-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)