Skip to main content

Governing the Soul: The Theoretical Support of Michel Foucault

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paradox and the School Leader

Part of the book series: Educational Leadership Theory ((ELT))

Abstract

In the schematics of chapter arrangement, the positioning of this chapter is to create useful imagery about an already established relevance of Foucault’s work to the conceptual frame of paradox and to suggest important support for what lies ahead. His work is here treated as exceeding the complementarity of its application in Chap. 2 to be considered epistemologically crucial to arguments made in the chapters which follow. The theoretical resources discussed in this chapter – built around the central concept of governmentality – are predominantly directed to my analysis of policy discourses of neoliberalism in Chap. 4 and the construction and representation of field data using paradox in Chaps. 6, 7 and 8. The deployment of Foucault’s tools of problematisation and critique is held over until Chap. 4, when they are used to both inform and illuminate a struggle for the ‘soul’ of the principal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This shift to ‘technologies of the self’ garners support from Connolly’s (2002) insistence that ‘one needs to examine established tactics of self-identity … by exploring the means by which one has become constituted as what one is, by probing the structures that maintain the plausibility of those configurations, and by analyzing from a perspective that problematizes the certainty of one’s self-identity the effects these structures and tactics have on others’ (p. 9–10) . Connolly brings a ‘Foucaultian care for identity and difference’ (in conjunction with a Nietzschean affirmation of the ‘abundance of life’) to what he terms an ‘ethic of cultivation’ (p. 10–11).

  2. 2.

    ‘Subjectivation’ (sometimes translated as ‘subjectivisation’) is a word coined by Foucault and used in his post-1981 writings, to refer to ‘the process by which one obtains the constitution of a subject, or more exactly, of a subjectivity’ (Foucault, 1988a, p. 253). In his earlier writings, Foucault gave the existing French word assujettissement a similar meaning.

  3. 3.

    The notion of ‘counter-conduct’ emerges in Foucault’s (2007) Security, Territory, Population as he rethinks the problem of resistance inside of a governmentality frame. At its core, counter-conduct is ‘the struggle in order to claim and obtain an other conduct’ (Lorenzini, 2016, p. 11 italics in original). Counter-conduct is given more extensive explanation in Chap. 5.

  4. 4.

    In the introduction to Hunter’s renowned text Rethinking the School (1994), editor Meghan Morris describes Hunter’s understanding of ‘pastoral pedagogy’ in the school setting as concerned with ‘the arts of self-examination’ and ‘care of individual souls’ (p. vii).

References

  • Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, P. L. J. (2013). The policy dispositif: Historical formation and method. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 807–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class the selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bardon, T., & Josserand, E. (2011). A Nietzschean reading of Foucauldian thinking: Constructing a project of the self within an ontology of becoming. Organization, 18(4), 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy. Political Theory, 27(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2008). Toward a new ‘logic’ of emancipation: Foucault and Rancière. Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butin, D. W. (2001). If this is resistance I would hate to see domination: Retrieving Foucault’s notion of resistance within educational research. Educational Studies, 32(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2015). Making policy move: Towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. E. (2002). Identity, difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2002). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2009). Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62(11), 1607–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. (2012). Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and contemporary neo-liberalism debates. Thesis Eleven, 108(1), 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977a). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977b). Theatrum philosophicum. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 165–196). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1, an introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980a). Confessions of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 194–228). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980b). Power and strategies. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 134–145). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980c). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–77 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980d). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48–78). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988a). The return of morality. In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984 (pp. 242–254). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988b). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000a). The masked philosopher (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 321–328). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000b). Polemics, politics and problematizations (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 111–120). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000c). Sexuality and solitude (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 175–184). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D. (2013). Educational leadership and Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. (2010). Foucault and the logic of dialectics. Contemporary Political Theory, 9(2), 220–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1986). Self-improvement. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 235–240). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2011). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leask, I. (2012). Beyond subjection: Notes on the later Foucault and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(s1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, D. (2016). From counter-conduct to critical attitude: Michel Foucault and the art of not being governed quite so much. Foucault Studies, (21), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2009). Self as enterprise dilemmas of control and resistance in Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L., & Rassool, N. (2002). School effectiveness: Fracturing the discourse. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, K., & Fejes, A. (2008). Mobilizing Foucault in studies of lifelong learning. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning: Governing the subject (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oksala, J. (2013). From biopower to governmentality. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 320–336). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. (2010). The ‘soul of the citizen,’ the invention of the social: Governing mentalities. In J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M.-C. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 547–556). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., & Besley, T. (2007). Why Foucault?: New directions in educational research. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, B. L. (1996). Foucault and the politics of resistance. Polity, 28(4), 445–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatelli, F. (2002). Mapping the terrain of a Foucauldian ethics: A response to the surveillance of schooling. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protevi, J. (2009). What does Foucault think is new about neo-liberalism? Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 21, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. S. (2003). The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. S., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (2006). Power/knowledge. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault (2nd ed., pp. 95–122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., & Shapiro, S. (2011). How to read Foucault’s ‘discipline and punish’. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, J. (2013). Power, resistance, and freedom. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A companion to Foucault (pp. 301–318). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D. (2012). Foucault, subjectivity and ethics: Towards a self-forming subject. Organization, 20(6), 904–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. (1996). The political ways of paradox: Renaissance literature and modern criticism. English Literary Renaissance, 26(2), 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickney, J. A. (2012). Judging teachers: Foucault, governance and agency during education reforms. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 649–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, P., Porter, C., & Davidson, A. I. (1993). The final Foucault and his ethics. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. (2012). Fantasies of empowerment: Mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dolan, C. (2020). Governing the Soul: The Theoretical Support of Michel Foucault. In: Paradox and the School Leader. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3086-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3086-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3085-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3086-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics