Skip to main content

In Vitro Fertilization: A Case Study in Kolkata, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh

Abstract

India has probably recorded the biggest growth in ART centres, and the number of ART cycles being performed has steadily risen and is said to be a global hub for IVF due to its cost advantage in fertility treatment. Finding strategies to reduce the cost of IVF treatment is very important. This study aims to explore the socio-economic background of the patients and treatment cost incurred to the patients undergoing IVF treatment in Kolkata, India, and to compare the cost with respect to the cost of IVF treatment in other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, G., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Dyer, S., Chambers, G., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Banker, M., & de Mouzon, J. (2017). International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies (ICMART) world report on ART, 2014 and the international glossary on infertility and fertility care 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranwal, A. (2018). Male infertility and treatment seeking in Mumbai: A case study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., & Mitra, P. (2013, August 13). Kolkata-turning-into-global-fertility-hub. Retrieved September 19, 2019 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Kolkata-turning-into-global-fertility-hub/articleshow/21792580.cms.

  • Bharadwaj, A. (2000). Infertility and gender: A perspective from India. In F. V. Balen, T. Gerrits, & M. Inhorn (Eds.), Social science research on childlessness in a global perspective: Proceedings of the conference 8–11 November 1999, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 65–78). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. (2016). The Indian IVF saga: A contested history. Reproductive Bio-medicine and Society Online, 2, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckett, W. M., Chain, R. C., Dean, N. L., & Sylvestre, C. (2007). Pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived following in vitro maturation (IVM), conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fertility and Sterility, 781–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M. G., & Adamson, G. D. (2009). The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: A review of selected developed countries. FertilSteril, 91, 2281–2294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demyttenaere, K., et al. (1992). Coping and the ineffectiveness of coping influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization through stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17(6), 655–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eijkemans, M., Polander, S., Mulders, A., Laven, J., Habbema, J., & Fauser, B. (2005). In- dividualized cost-effective conventional ovulation induction treatment in normogonadotrophicanovulatory infertility (WHO group 2). Human Reproduction, 20, 2830–2837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassino, S., Piero, A., Boggio, S., Piccioni, V., & Garzaro, L. (2002). Anxiety, depression and anger suppression in infertile couples. Human Reproduction, 17, 2986–2994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiddelers, A., van Montfoort, A., Dirksen, C., Dumoulin, J., Land, J., Dunselman, G., et al. (2006). Single versus double embryo transfer: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction, 21, 2090–2097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, M., Strandell, A., Thorburn, J., Daya, S., & Wikland, M. (2003). Economic evaluation of infertility for tubal disease. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Bower, C., & Webb, S. (2002). The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 725–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatoum, H., Keye, W., Marrs, R., Walton, S., & Marshall, D. (2005). A Markov model of the cost-effectiveness of human derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus recombinant FSH using comparative clinical data. Fertility and Sterility, 83, 804–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoorens, S., Conklin, A., & Tiessen, J. (2008). Between politics and clinics—The many faces of biomedical policy in Europe: Analysis of drivers and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies policy. Santa Monica, CA: Published by RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS). (2005). National guidelines for accreditation, supervision and regulation of ART clinics in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiabi, Q., et al. (2016). Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertility and Sterility, 105(1), 0015–0282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansal-Kalra, S., Milad, M., & Grobman, W. A. (2005). In vitro fertilization (IVF) versus gonadotropins followed by IVF as treatment for primary infertility: A cost-based decision analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 600–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, A., Carllson, P., & Bergh, C. (2006). Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: Obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Human Reproduction, 21, 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemetti, et al. (2005). Complications of IVF and ovulation induction. Human Reproduction, 20(12), 3293–3300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koradia, R. (2019, March 14). IVF helps growth of Indian medical tourism. Retrieved September 12, 2019 from https://www.expresshealthcare.in/blogs/guest-blogs-healthcare/ivf-helps-growth-of-indian-medical-tourism/410252/.

  • Lloyd, A., Kennedy, R., Hutchinson, J., & Sawyer, W. (2003). Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 80, 1108–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukassen, H., Braat, D., Wetzels, A., Zielhuis, G., Adang, E., Scheenjes, E., et al. (2005). Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: A randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 20, 702–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N., Shah, D., Pai, R., Pai, H. D., & Bankar, M. (2013). Assisted reproductive technology in India: A 3 year retrospective data analysis. Journal of Human Reproductive Science, 6, 235–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, M., & Sarojini, B. (2006). Assisted reproductive technologies in India. Development, 49(4), 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata, et al. (2019). Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: A nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children’s study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardelli, et al. (2014). Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): Evaluation of evidence to support public policy development. Reproductive Health, 11, 76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ombelet, W. (2013). The walking egg project: Universal access to infertility care—From dream to reality. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 5(2), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retrieved September 19, 2019 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Kolkata-turning-into-global-fertility-hub/articleshow/21792580.cms.

  • Retrieved September 24, 2019 from https://www.telegraphindia.com/states/west-bengal/infertility-treatment-at-sskm-for-free/cid/1484560.

  • Silverberg, K., Daya, S., Auray, J., Duru, G., Ledger, W., Wikland, M., et al. (2002). Analysis of the cost effectiveness of recombinant versus urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programs in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 77, 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, et al. (2011). Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization and success of fertility treatments: Analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 96(1), 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandell, A., Lindhard, A., & Eckerlund, I. (2005). Cost-effectiveness analysis of salpingectomy prior to IVF, based on randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 20, 3284–3292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, D., Out, H., Palmer, S., & van Loon, J. (2001). The cost-effectiveness of IVF in the UK: A comparison of three gonadotrophin treatments. Human Reproduction, 16, 2557–2562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlatzis, B. C., & Grimbiziz, G. (2009). Pregnancy and child outcome after assisted reproduction techniques. Human Reproduction. Supplement, 14, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, P. J., & Maheshwari, A. (2014). Low-cost in vitro fertilization: Current insights. International Journal of Women’s Health, 6, 817–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widge, A. (2002). Sociocultural attitudes towards infertility and assisted reproduction in India. In E. Vayenna, P. J. Rowe, & P. D. Griffin (Eds.), Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, E., Wang, J., Davies, M. J., & Norman, R. (2002). Early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Human Reproduction, 17, 3220–3223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization Task Force on the Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infertility. (1987). WHO workshop on the investigation of the subfertile couple. In S. S. Ratnam, E. S. Teoh, & C. Anandkumar (Eds.), Infertility: male and female. Advances in fertility and sterility series (Vol. 4, pp. 121–72). Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suparna Banerjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Banerjee, S., Baranwal, A. (2020). In Vitro Fertilization: A Case Study in Kolkata, India. In: Chattopadhyay, A., Ghosh, S. (eds) Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3044-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3045-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics