Abstract
India has probably recorded the biggest growth in ART centres, and the number of ART cycles being performed has steadily risen and is said to be a global hub for IVF due to its cost advantage in fertility treatment. Finding strategies to reduce the cost of IVF treatment is very important. This study aims to explore the socio-economic background of the patients and treatment cost incurred to the patients undergoing IVF treatment in Kolkata, India, and to compare the cost with respect to the cost of IVF treatment in other countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamson, G., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Dyer, S., Chambers, G., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Banker, M., & de Mouzon, J. (2017). International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies (ICMART) world report on ART, 2014 and the international glossary on infertility and fertility care 2017.
Baranwal, A. (2018). Male infertility and treatment seeking in Mumbai: A case study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Basu, S., & Mitra, P. (2013, August 13). Kolkata-turning-into-global-fertility-hub. Retrieved September 19, 2019 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Kolkata-turning-into-global-fertility-hub/articleshow/21792580.cms.
Bharadwaj, A. (2000). Infertility and gender: A perspective from India. In F. V. Balen, T. Gerrits, & M. Inhorn (Eds.), Social science research on childlessness in a global perspective: Proceedings of the conference 8–11 November 1999, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 65–78). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Bharadwaj, A. (2016). The Indian IVF saga: A contested history. Reproductive Bio-medicine and Society Online, 2, 54–61.
Buckett, W. M., Chain, R. C., Dean, N. L., & Sylvestre, C. (2007). Pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived following in vitro maturation (IVM), conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fertility and Sterility, 781–789.
Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M. G., & Adamson, G. D. (2009). The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: A review of selected developed countries. FertilSteril, 91, 2281–2294.
Demyttenaere, K., et al. (1992). Coping and the ineffectiveness of coping influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization through stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17(6), 655–665.
Eijkemans, M., Polander, S., Mulders, A., Laven, J., Habbema, J., & Fauser, B. (2005). In- dividualized cost-effective conventional ovulation induction treatment in normogonadotrophicanovulatory infertility (WHO group 2). Human Reproduction, 20, 2830–2837.
Fassino, S., Piero, A., Boggio, S., Piccioni, V., & Garzaro, L. (2002). Anxiety, depression and anger suppression in infertile couples. Human Reproduction, 17, 2986–2994.
Fiddelers, A., van Montfoort, A., Dirksen, C., Dumoulin, J., Land, J., Dunselman, G., et al. (2006). Single versus double embryo transfer: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction, 21, 2090–2097.
Granberg, M., Strandell, A., Thorburn, J., Daya, S., & Wikland, M. (2003). Economic evaluation of infertility for tubal disease. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 301–308.
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Bower, C., & Webb, S. (2002). The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 725–730.
Hatoum, H., Keye, W., Marrs, R., Walton, S., & Marshall, D. (2005). A Markov model of the cost-effectiveness of human derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus recombinant FSH using comparative clinical data. Fertility and Sterility, 83, 804–807.
Hoorens, S., Conklin, A., & Tiessen, J. (2008). Between politics and clinics—The many faces of biomedical policy in Europe: Analysis of drivers and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies policy. Santa Monica, CA: Published by RAND Corporation.
Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS). (2005). National guidelines for accreditation, supervision and regulation of ART clinics in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
Jiabi, Q., et al. (2016). Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertility and Sterility, 105(1), 0015–0282.
Kansal-Kalra, S., Milad, M., & Grobman, W. A. (2005). In vitro fertilization (IVF) versus gonadotropins followed by IVF as treatment for primary infertility: A cost-based decision analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 600–604.
Kjellberg, A., Carllson, P., & Bergh, C. (2006). Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: Obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Human Reproduction, 21, 210–216.
Klemetti, et al. (2005). Complications of IVF and ovulation induction. Human Reproduction, 20(12), 3293–3300.
Koradia, R. (2019, March 14). IVF helps growth of Indian medical tourism. Retrieved September 12, 2019 from https://www.expresshealthcare.in/blogs/guest-blogs-healthcare/ivf-helps-growth-of-indian-medical-tourism/410252/.
Lloyd, A., Kennedy, R., Hutchinson, J., & Sawyer, W. (2003). Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 80, 1108–1113.
Lukassen, H., Braat, D., Wetzels, A., Zielhuis, G., Adang, E., Scheenjes, E., et al. (2005). Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: A randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 20, 702–708.
Malhotra, N., Shah, D., Pai, R., Pai, H. D., & Bankar, M. (2013). Assisted reproductive technology in India: A 3 year retrospective data analysis. Journal of Human Reproductive Science, 6, 235–40.
Mukherjee, M., & Sarojini, B. (2006). Assisted reproductive technologies in India. Development, 49(4), 128–134.
Nagata, et al. (2019). Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: A nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children’s study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 77.
Nardelli, et al. (2014). Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): Evaluation of evidence to support public policy development. Reproductive Health, 11, 76.
Ombelet, W. (2013). The walking egg project: Universal access to infertility care—From dream to reality. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 5(2), 161–175.
Retrieved September 19, 2019 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Kolkata-turning-into-global-fertility-hub/articleshow/21792580.cms.
Retrieved September 24, 2019 from https://www.telegraphindia.com/states/west-bengal/infertility-treatment-at-sskm-for-free/cid/1484560.
Silverberg, K., Daya, S., Auray, J., Duru, G., Ledger, W., Wikland, M., et al. (2002). Analysis of the cost effectiveness of recombinant versus urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programs in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 77, 107–113.
Smith, et al. (2011). Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization and success of fertility treatments: Analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 96(1), 95–101.
Strandell, A., Lindhard, A., & Eckerlund, I. (2005). Cost-effectiveness analysis of salpingectomy prior to IVF, based on randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 20, 3284–3292.
Sykes, D., Out, H., Palmer, S., & van Loon, J. (2001). The cost-effectiveness of IVF in the UK: A comparison of three gonadotrophin treatments. Human Reproduction, 16, 2557–2562.
Tarlatzis, B. C., & Grimbiziz, G. (2009). Pregnancy and child outcome after assisted reproduction techniques. Human Reproduction. Supplement, 14, 231–242.
Teoh, P. J., & Maheshwari, A. (2014). Low-cost in vitro fertilization: Current insights. International Journal of Women’s Health, 6, 817–827.
Widge, A. (2002). Sociocultural attitudes towards infertility and assisted reproduction in India. In E. Vayenna, P. J. Rowe, & P. D. Griffin (Eds.), Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Winter, E., Wang, J., Davies, M. J., & Norman, R. (2002). Early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Human Reproduction, 17, 3220–3223.
World Health Organization Task Force on the Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infertility. (1987). WHO workshop on the investigation of the subfertile couple. In S. S. Ratnam, E. S. Teoh, & C. Anandkumar (Eds.), Infertility: male and female. Advances in fertility and sterility series (Vol. 4, pp. 121–72). Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banerjee, S., Baranwal, A. (2020). In Vitro Fertilization: A Case Study in Kolkata, India. In: Chattopadhyay, A., Ghosh, S. (eds) Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3044-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3045-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)