Skip to main content

Understanding the Preference to Have More Sons among Hindu and Muslim Women: A Case Study from North Dinajpur District of West Bengal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

Son preference and daughter aversion are deep-seated in patriarchal, cultural and religious beliefs that uphold the essential value of having a son. However, little is known about the determinants of such preferential attitudes towards male children. The present study, using a population based survey data of 500 young married women (18–30 years) in rural north Dinajpur district of West Bengal, found that nearly 80% of the respondents felt that it is very important to have at least one son as against 56% who felt it is very important to have at least one daughter. Women belonging to Muslim communities were more likely to hold preferential attitude towards sons. On the other hand, women having any mass media exposure and belonging to upper wealth quintiles were less likely to hold preferential attitude towards sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52(3), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. M. (2004). The squabble that never ends: Religion and fertility. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(39), 4294–4296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. M., & Amin, S. (2000). Conditioning factors for fertility decline in Bengal: History, language, identity, and openness to innovation. Population and Development Review, 26(4), 761–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. N. M., & Rajan, S. I. (1990). Demographic transition in Kerala revisited. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(35), 1957–1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in Northern India. Demography, 40(4), 637–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, S. S., Wypij, D., & Das Gupta, M. (2001). Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a North Indian City. Demography, 38(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V., & Iyer, S. (2004). Religion and fertility in India: The role of son preference and daughter aversion. Cambridge Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5410.

  • Borooah, V. K., & Iyer, S. (2005). Religion, literacy and the female-to-male ratio. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(5), 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37(3), 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M. (2005). Explaining Asia’s “missing women”: A new look at the data. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M. (2006). Cultural versus biological factors in explaining Asia’s “Missing Women”: Response to Oster. Population and Development Review, 32(2), 328–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Sathar, Z. A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, P. M., & Alagarajan, M. (2005). Population growth, fertility, and religion in India. Economic and Political weekly, 40(5), 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, S. R. (1979). Kinship, Inheritance among Muslims: Socio-cultural consequences. Social Scientist, 7(12), 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, P., Gautam, A., Verma, R., Khanna, A., Khan, N., Brahme, D., et al. (2014). Study on masculinity, intimate partner violence and son preference in India. International Center for Research on Women: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, R., & Malhotra, A. (2006). Son preference and daughter neglect in India (pp. 1–6). Working paper, ICRW. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.733.1585andrep=rep1andtype=pdf.

  • Roy, T. K., & Niranjan, S. (2004). Indicators of women’s empowerment in India. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 19(3), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 37(20), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atreyee Sinha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, A., Ram, F. (2020). Understanding the Preference to Have More Sons among Hindu and Muslim Women: A Case Study from North Dinajpur District of West Bengal. In: Chattopadhyay, A., Ghosh, S. (eds) Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3044-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3045-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics