Skip to main content

Son Preference and Hindu–Muslim Fertility Differentials in ‘Ultra-low’ Fertility Context in Kolkata, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh
  • 242 Accesses

Abstract

Son preference among Hindus and Muslims, in the context of ‘ultra-low’ fertility, is highly debated with respect to fertility and contraceptive use differentials by religion. This paper reveals that for the Hindus, son preference remains masked and co-opted through the acceptance of the daughter in the family. In case of Muslims, the stated preference for sons is supported by a tolerance for a girl child, essentially leading to larger families with greater numbers of daughters and sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul, S., & Moinuddin, H. (2003). Divorce and separation among Muslims in West Bengal. In I. Ahamd (Ed.), Divorce and remarriage among Muslims in India (pp. 161–178). Delhi: Manohar Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P. C. (1966). A Muslim sub-caste of north India: Problems of cultural integration. Economic and Political Weekly, 1(4), 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, I. (1976). Introduction. In I. Ahmad (Ed.), Family, Kinship and marriage among Muslims in India (pp. xvii–xxxiv). Delhi: Manohar Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, I. (1983). Introduction. In I. Ahmad (Ed.), Modernisation and social change among Muslims in India (pp. xvii–xlix). New Delhi: Manohar Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alagarajan, M., & Kulkarni, P. M. (2008). Religious differentials in fertility in India: Is there a convergence. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(48), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S., & Mariam, A. G. (1987). Son preference in Bangladesh: An emerging barrier to fertility regulation. Journal of Biosocial Science, 19, 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azim, S. (1997). Muslim women: Emerging identity. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., & Amin, S. (2000). Conditioning factors for fertility decline in Bengal: History, language identity and openness to innovations. Population and Development Review, 26(4), 761–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. M. (2005). Ultramodern contraception: Social class and family planning in India. Asian Population Studies, 1(3), 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. M. (2004). The squabble that never ends: Religion and fertility. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(39), 4294–4296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, D. (2006). Indispensable sons: Negotiating reproductive desires in rural Vietnam. Gender, Place and Culture, 13(3), 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography, 40(4), 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2005). Role of religion in fertility decline: The case of Indian Muslims. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(5), 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. N. M. (1996). Contours of fertility decline in India: A district level study based on the 1991 census. In Srinivasan, K. (Ed.), Population policy and reproductive health. Delhi: Hindustan Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2008). Why religion is nothing special but is central. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences363(1499), 2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0007.

  • Borooah, V., & Iyer, S. (2004). Religion and fertility in India: The role of son preference and daughter aversion. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 0436, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V., Do, Q.-T., Iyer, S., & Joshi, S. (2009). Missing women and India’s religious demography. Policy Research Working Paper 5096, Development Research Group, Poverty and Inequality Team, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, C., & George, M. V. (1962). Mechanisms underlying the differences in fertility patterns of Bengali women from three socioeconomic groups. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 11(1), 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A. (2017). Margins of citizenship: Muslim experiences in urban India. India: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, N., & Hinchcliffe, D. (1978). Women and law reform in contemporary Islam. In L. Beck & N. Keddie (Eds.), Women in the Muslim world (pp. 99–114). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331293807.

  • Devji, F. F. (2008). Gender and the politics of space: the movement for women’s reform, 1857–1900. In S. Sarkar & T. Sarkar (Eds.), Women and social reform in modern India: A reader (Vol. 2, pp. 99–114). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmalingam, A., & Morgan, S. P. (2004). Pervasive Muslim-Hindu fertility differences in India. Demography, 41(3), 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmalingam, A., Navaneetham, K., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Hindu-Muslim fertility differences: Evidence from national family health survey—II. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(5), 429–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., & Murthi, M. (2001). Fertility, education and development: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 27(1), 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, L. (1969). Matriliny and Islam: Religion and society in the Laccadives. New Delhi: National Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eade, J. (1983). Modernisation and Islamisation among members of Calcutta’s educated Bengali Muslim middle class. In I. Ahmad (Ed.), Modernisation and social change among Muslims in India (pp. 55–82). New Delhi: Manohar Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. H. (2008). Education for women. In S. Sarkar & T. Sarkar (Eds.), Women and social reform in modern India: A reader (Vol. 1, pp. 53–82). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayer, L., & Jaffrelot, C. (2012). Muslims in Indian cities: Trajectories of marginalization. New Delhi: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., & Begum, S. (2015). Influence of son preference on contraceptive method mix: some evidences from ‘Two Bengals’. Asian Population Studies, 11(3), 296–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., & Chattopadhyay, (2017). Religion, contraceptive method-mix and son preference among Bengali-speaking community of Indian subcontinent. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(6), 929–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. (2016). Second demographic transition or aspirations in transition: An exploratory analysis of lowest-low fertility in Kolkata, India. Asian Population Studies. Retrieved on 2, August 2016 from https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2016.1203211.

  • Ghosh, S. (2018). Hindu–Muslim fertility differentials in India: Indirect estimation at the district level from census 2011. Indian Journal of Human Development, 12(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. In Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. United States: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. United States: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2001). Spatial patterns of fertility transition in Indian districts. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 713–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2013). Fertility at the district level in India: Lessons from the 2011 census. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(23), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., & Patel, P. P. (2016). Assessing Hindu-Muslim fertility differentials in West Bengal: Insights for National Family Health Survey-3 data. Journal of Family History, 1–33, Retrieved on 5, March 2016 from https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199016635216.

  • Hossain, I Md. (2012). Muslim women in West Bengal: An enquiry into their minority status. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(3), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain, Z., Ghosh, S., & Dutta, M. (2013). ‘Ultramodern contraception’ re-examined: Cultural dissent, or son preference? Asian Population Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2013.816480.

  • Iyer, S. (2002). Understanding religion and the economics of fertility in India. In: Centre of South Asia Studies Occasional Paper 2, Centre of South Asia Studies, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, R., & Jeffery, P. (2000). Religion and fertility in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(35–36), 3253–3259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1999). Socio-religious reform movements in British India. In G. Johnson (Ed.), The New Cambridge history of India (Vol. III, pp. 15–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, N. (2009). Deconstructing and reconstructing ‘Muslim Women’ through women’s narratives. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(1), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, P. M., & Alagarajan, M. (2005). Population growth, fertility and religion in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(5), 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lateef, S. (1983). Modernisation in India and the status of Muslim women. In I. Ahmed (Ed.), Modernisation and social change among Muslims in India (pp. 153–183). New Delhi: Manohar Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lateef, S. (1990). Muslim Women in India: Political and private realities, 1890s–1980s. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, V. K., Lahiri, S., & Luther, N. Y. (1999). Child nutrition in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports Number 14. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India and East-West Center, Population and Health Studies, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, R., & Lee, S.-H. (2000). Child immunization in Madhya Pradesh. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports Number 15. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India and East-West Center, Population and Health Studies, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N., & Kalla, A. K. (2006). Kinship system, fertility and son preference among Muslims: A review. Anthropologist, 8(4), 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, R. (2012). In search of reasons for the comparatively higher fertility among Muslim women in Delhi, India: Postulating a cultural hypothesis. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 32(4), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2012.746181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palamuleni, M. E. (2014). Social and economic factors affecting ethnic fertility differentials in Malawi. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 3(1), 70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, G. (1999). Can a Muslim be an Indian? Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41(4), 608–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasupuleti, S. S., Pathak, P., & Jatrana, S. (2017). Hindu-Muslim fertility differential in India: A cohort approach. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49(2), 147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. I. (2005). District level fertility estimates for Hindus and Muslims. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(5), 437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registrar General of India (RGI). (2011). Provisional population totals, paper 1 of 2011: Census of India 2011, series 1—India. New Delhi: Controller of Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registrar General of India (RGI). (2014). Primary census abstract 2011. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registrar General of India (RGI). (2016a). Sample registration system: Statistical report 2016. New Delhi: Controller of Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registrar General of India (RGI). (2016b). Religion primary census abstract: Census of India 2011—India. New Delhi: Controller of Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille, M.-C. (2013). Determinants of stated son preference in India: Are men and women different? The Journal of Development Studies, 49(5), 657–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, T. K., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Daughter discrimination and future sex ratio at birth in India. Asian Population Studies, 9(3), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2012.714669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., & Sarkar, T. (2008). Introduction. In S. Sarkar & T. Sarkar (Eds.), Women and social reform in modern India: A reader (Vol. 1, pp. 1–18). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. (1995). Socio-economic and demographic differentials between Hindus and Muslims in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(46), 2947–2953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenk, M. K. (2007). Dowry and public policy in contemporary India: The behavioural ecology of a social “evil”. Human Nature, 18, 242–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, B. (2006). Contraceptive use and desire for additional children as indicators of son preference, India and its states. Man and Development, 28(3), 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Willigen, J., & Channa, V. (1991). Law, custom, and crimes against women: The problem of dowry death in India. Human Organization, 50, 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visaria, A. (2015). Religion and son preference in India and Bangladesh: Three essays on comparing Hindus and Muslims on son preference and sex differentials in child health. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations, 2079. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2079.

  • Waheed, A. (2009). Dowry among Indian Muslims: Ideals and practices. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(1), 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, M. H. (1978). The status and fertility patterns of Muslim women. In I. Beck & N. Keddie (Eds.), Women in the Muslim world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The earlier draft of the paper was presented in 2017 Annual Meeting Program of Population Association of America, 27–29 April, Chicago, USA. We acknowledge the comments of Zheng Wu and Terence Hall in order to improve our arguments. The authors are grateful to the Asia Research Centre (ARC), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and also to the Research Investigators. Assistance provided by the then Chairman, Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC), during the field surveys was of immense help. Finally, the authors express deep regard to all the study participants for their readiness in participation in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saswata Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, S., Ghosh, N. (2020). Son Preference and Hindu–Muslim Fertility Differentials in ‘Ultra-low’ Fertility Context in Kolkata, India. In: Chattopadhyay, A., Ghosh, S. (eds) Population Dynamics in Eastern India and Bangladesh. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3045-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3044-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3045-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics