Abstract
Particularly since the announcement in 2013 of China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), infrastructure development has become one of the chief axes of competition between China and the West. Chinese infrastructure finance has gone from about 25% of total lending by international development institutions in 2002 to nearly 75% in 2016. The respective approaches reflect the broader development models of the two sides: China’s is heavily state-centric and draws upon the huge domestic construction industry that has fueled its own rise; Western approaches tend to be market-oriented and embedded in legal constraints designed to mitigate a host of environmental, social, safety, and other types of risks. There are systematic biases in both approaches. We find that Chinese project developers tend to overestimate the positive externalities and underestimate negative ones, reflecting their own domestic experience. This leads, on the one hand, to problems with fiscal sustainability, as well as negative environmental and social consequences. One of the consequences is a high level of non-performing loans, whose aggregate size may be approximated by the bailouts provided by the Chinese central bank to its development banks, the China Exim Bank and the China Development Bank. Western developers, by contrast, focus on internal rates of return, and place great emphasis on mitigating risk. This tends to lengthen the time to complete projects and increases their costs. This often makes their projects non-competitive when faced with Chinese competition. Efforts by the World Bank to revise its safeguards regime over the past decade do not appear to have mitigated this problem. The ideal approach to needed infrastructure projects lies somewhere between the Chinese and Western models: China needs to become more compliant with international standards, while Western development agencies need to adopt more realistic standards to meet a newly competitive infrastructure world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Updated estimates for aggregate spending on HSR provided by Zhenhua Chen; we are grateful to the author for this information.
- 2.
These numbers are contested; there is consensus that there needs to be better data produced on migration and the number for Chinese workers in these infrastructure developments and more transparency regarding the terms of loans for infrastructure to guard against mounting unsustainable debt (Dollar 2016).
- 3.
China now tops the list of developing countries with the most public-private partnerships at 1,488 projects between 1990 and 2018 (World Bank PPI 2018). The top sponsors of these public-private partnerships include Beijing Sound Environment Industry Group in water and sewerage and Xinao Gas Holdings Limited in natural gas (PPI World Bank 2018). However, given the fact that Chinese SOEs and development banks are likely to be bailed out of bad investments, it is hard to know how what it means when the Chinese call something a “public-private partnership” how risks are being reallocated to project implementors.
References
Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2016) Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 32(3):360–390
Bräutigam D (2015) 5 Myths about Chinese investment in Africa. Retrieved from Foreign Policy: http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/04/5-myths-about-chinese-investment-in-africa/
Caribbean Development Bank (2017) The Caribbean public private partnership toolkit – environmental and social impact of highway 2000, Jamaica
Chellaney B (2017) China’s creditor imperialism. Retrieved from Project Syndicate: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-sri-lanka-hambantota-port-debt-by-brahma-chellaney-2017-12
China EXIM (2006–2016) Annual reports. Export Import Bank of China, Beijing
Currey K (2014) Some evolving trends at the World Bank: lending, funding, staffing. Ford Foundation
David, Stanway. Reuters (2018) China’s total arable land falls for Fourth Year in 2018: resources ministry. Accessed 2018: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-agriculture-land/chinas-total-arable-land-falls-for-fourth-year-in-2017-resources-ministry-idUSKCN1IK059
Diamond L, Schell O (2018) Chinese influence and American interests: promoting constructive vigilance. Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
Dollar D (2016) China’s engagement with Africa. John L. Thornton China Center at Brookings, Washington, DC
ENR (2016) Engineering news-record. Retrieved from Engineering News-Record: http://www.enr.com/toplists/2016-Top-250-Global-Contractors1
ESI Africa (2016) DRC: Inga 3 to proceed without EIA, says international rivers. Retrieved from ESI Africa - Africa’s Power Journal: https://www.esi-africa.com/news/drc-inga-3-proceed-without-eia-says-international-rivers/
Gasparro K (2018) Power Africa (Leadership Academy for Development Case Study, 2018)
Goodland R, Mercier J-R (1999) The evolution of environmental assessment in the World Bank: from “Approval” to results. Environment Department Paper Series
Haggard S (2018) Developmental states. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
Haynes K, Chen Z (2015) Chinese railways in the era of high speed. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley
Independent Evaluation Group (2010) Safeguards and sustainability in a changing world. Washington, DC, The World Bank Group
International Rivers (2016) The Inga 3 hydropower project. Retrieved from International Rivers Web site: https://www.internationalrivers.org/campaigns/the-inga-3-hydropower-project
Jia C (2015) Policy banks get $90bn cash infusion. China Daily
Jia C (2017) Ministry plans rules to curb PPP misuse. China Daily
John Hopkins SAIS (2017) China Africa research initiative – John Hopkins school of advanced international studies. Retrieved from Data: Chinese Workers in Africa: http://www.sais-cari.org/data-chinese-workers-in-africa/
Larmer B (2017) What the world’s emptiest international airport says about China’s influence. The New York Times Magazine
Leo B, Moss T (2017) Congress passes the electrify Africa act...finally. Center for Global Development. 29 September 2017. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/congress-passes-electrify-africa-act-finally
Li T (2008) China’s nonperforming loans: A $540 Billion problem unsolved. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1278235
Linn J (2004) The role of World Bank lending in middle income countries. The OED conference on the effectiveness of policies and reforms. Brookings Institution, Washington
Mallaby S (2009) NGOs: fighting poverty, hurting the poor. Foreign Policy
McKinsey Global Institute (2015) Debt and (Not Much) Deleveraging. McKinsey
Mooney T (2016) Work on Colombo port city project to restart. IHS Fairplay
Moramudali U (2017) Sri Lanka’s debt and China’s money. The Diplomat
Naughton B (2015) Local debt restructuring: a case of ongoing authoritarian reform. China Leadership Monitor No. 47
Olorunnipa T, Alake T (2016) Obama’s Africa power plan falls short, leaving continent in dark. Bloomberg Politics. 29 September 2017. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-21/africa-left-in-dark-as-9-7-billion-obama-power-plan-falls-short
Patton, Dominique. Reuters (2014) More than 40 percent of China’s arable land degraded: Xinhua. Accessed 2018: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-soil/more-than-40-percent-of-chinas-arable-land-degraded-xinhua-idUSKBN0IO0Y720141104
Ross A (2015) China’s ‘infrastructure for minerals’ deal gets reality-check in Congo. Reuters. Accessed 2019: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congodemocratic-mining-china-insight-idUSKCN0PI1UB20150709
Shepard W (2016) The story behind the world’s emptiest international airport. Forbes
Shi Y, Guo S, Sun P (2017) The role of infrastructure in China’s regional economic growth. J Asian Econ:26–41
Silva P, Pagiola S (2003) A review of the valuation of environmental costs and benefits in World Bank projects. Environmental economics series
United States Treasury (2014) World Bank Inga 3 Bass Chute (BC) and Midsized Hydropower Development Technical Assistance (TA) Project U.S. Position. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/development-banks/Documents/Inga.pdf
Walker C (2018) What is “sharp power”? J Democr 29:9–23
Walker C, Ludwig J (2017) From “soft power” to “sharp power”: rising authoritarian influence in the democratic world. Intl Forum for Democratic Studies, Washington, DC
Wijedasa N (2014) Coal power chaos: Chinese firm fumes. The Sunday Times of Sri Lanka
Wildau G (2017) China’s reliance on infrastructure stimulus at record high. Financial Times
Wilmsen B, Michael Webber M, Yuefang D (2011) Development for whom? Rural to urban resettlement at the three gorges dam, China. Asian Stud Rev 35(1):21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2011.552707
World Bank (2002–2016) Annual reports. World Bank, Washington, DC
World Bank (2017a) World Bank development indicators. Retrieved from Gross Fixed Capital Formation (%GDP) and (current US$): https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.GDI.FTOT.CD
World Bank (2017b) World Bank open data. Retrieved from The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/
World Bank (2018) Implementation completion and results report for a DRC Inga 3 and Mid-Size Hydropower Development Technical Assistance: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/266481521472063648/pdf/ICR00004325-03142018.pdf
World Bank Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) (2018) https://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/environmental-and-social-framework
World Bank Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Database (2018) Featured rankings 1990 to H1 2018: http://ppi.worldbank.org/snapshots/rankings
Wu X (2016) China’s growing local government debt levels. MIT Center for Finance and Policy, Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fukuyama, F., Bennon, M., Bataineh, B. (2020). Chinese and Western Approaches to Infrastructure Development. In: Chen, Z., Bowen, W.M., Whittington, D. (eds) Development Studies in Regional Science. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 42. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1435-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1435-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1434-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1435-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)