Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Alternative Means of Prosecuting Non-Physical Domestic Abuse: Are Stalking Laws an Under-Utilised Resource?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Criminalising Coercive Control

Abstract

The criminal law traditionally has focused exclusively on physical violence and some forms of financial wrongdoing. The recent interest in non-physical abuse has led to consideration of how this harm also might be addressed. Currently, much domestic abuse—including economic and psychological abuse—is indirectly criminalised via breaches of civil orders. This chapter investigates whether that abuse can, is and should also be directly criminalised through stalking laws, particularly in the context of an ongoing intimate relationship where the partners are cohabitating. In doing so, we discuss the broader issue of whether these laws constitute an adequate mechanism for dealing with non-physical abuse. We conclude that although stalking provisions can be used to prosecute non-physical domestic violence, restricted community and expert understandings of stalking suggest that the enactment of a domestic abuse-specific offence is a more appropriate solution to comprehensively deal with this form of abuse.

An earlier version of Chap. 5 was published in the Melbourne University Law Review. We are grateful to the editors for permission to publish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashworth, A., & Zedner, L. (2011). Preventive orders: A problem of undercriminalization? In R. A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. E. Marshall, M. Renzo, & V. Tadros (Eds.), The boundaries of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, B. (2000). An empirical study of stalking victimization. Violence and Victims, 15(4), 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, M. P. (2003). Power and control dynamics in pre-stalking and stalking situations. Journal of Family Violence, 18(4), 2017–2217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, M. P. (2000). Stalking by former intimates: Verbal threats and other predictors of physical violence. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. W., Baker, T., Greening, D., Hartman, C. R., Burgess, A. G., Douglas, J. E., et al. (1997). Stalking behaviors within domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12(4), 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cass, R. A. (1975). Ignorance of the law: A maxim revisited. William and Mary Law Review, 17(4), 671–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassin, S. (2013). Eggshell minds and invisible injuries: Can neuroscience challenge longstanding treatment of tort injuries? Houston Law Review, 50(3), 929–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J., & Leverick, F. (2008). Fair labelling in criminal law. Modern Law Review, 71(2), 217–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service. (n.d.) Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. Retrieved from https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/controlling-or-coercive-behaviour-intimate-or-family-relationship#a09.

  • Currie, S. (2000). Stalking and domestic violence: Views of Queensland magistrates. Paper presented at the Stalking: Criminal Justice Response Conference, Sydney, 7 December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. E., Coker, A. L., & Sanderson, M. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of being stalked for men and women. Violence and Victims, 17(4), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice and Equality. (n.d.). Second National Strategy on Domestic, Sexual and Gender-Based Violence, 2016–2021. Retrieved from http://www.cosc.ie/en/COSC/Second%20National%20Strategy.pdf/Files/Second%20National%20Strategy.pdf.

  • Department of Social Services. (n.d.). The National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and Their Children 2010–2022. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/08_2014/national_plan1.pdf.

  • Dennison, S., & Thomson, D. (2000). Community perceptions of stalking: What are the fundamental concerns? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 7(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2015). Do we need a specific domestic violence offence? Melbourne University Law Review, 39(4), 434–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2007). Not a crime like any other: Sentencing breaches of domestic violence protection orders. Criminal Law Journal, 31(4), 200–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, E. (2001). The criminalisation of stalking: Constructing the problem and evaluating the solution. London: Cavendish.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy, T., & Raj, M. (2014). Stopping the stalker: Victim responses to stalking. Griffith Journal of Law and Human Dignity, 2(1), 174–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J., & King, C. (2017). Expediency, legitimacy, and the rule of law: A systems perspective on civil/criminal procedural hybrids. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 11(4), 733–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, A. M., & Taplin, J. L. (1998). Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target-stalker relationship. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5(1), 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2010). Call to End Violence Against Women and Girls. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/118150/vawg-paper.pdf.

  • Horder, J. (2016). Ashworth’s principles of criminal law (8th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horder, J. (1994). Rethinking non-fatal offences against the person. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14(3), 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husak, D. (2004). The criminal law as last resort. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2), 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keedy, E. R. (1908). Ignorance and mistake in the criminal law. Harvard Law Review, 22(2), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, L. (2012). Principles, policies, and politics of criminal law. In L. Zedner & J. V. Roberts (Eds.), Principles and values in criminal law and criminal justice: Essays in honour of Andrew Ashworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (2001). Stalking in South Australia: The Criminal Justice Response, Information Bulletin No 25. Office of Crime Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.ocsar.sa.gov.au/docs/information_bulletins/IB25.pdf.

  • McMahon, M., & McGorrery, P. (2016). Criminalising controlling and coercive behaviour: The next step in the prosecution of family violence? Alternative Law Journal, 41(2), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, M., Weaver, T., & Resick, P. (2000). Intimate partner violence and stalking behavior: Exploration of patterns and correlates in a sample of acutely battered women. Violence Victims, 15(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R. (2003). When stalkers become violent: The threat to public figures and private lives. Psychiatric Annals, 33(10), 658–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohandie, K., Meloy, J. R., McGowan, M., & Williams, J. (2006). The RECON typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(1), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. S. (2013). Liberty’s constraints on what should be made criminal. In R. A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. E. Marshall, M. Renzo, & V. Tadros (Eds.), Criminalization: The political morality of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P., & Pathé, M. (2002). Stalking. Crime and Justice, 29, 273–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P., Pathé, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(8), 1244–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2009). Stalkers and their victims (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Justice. (2016). Safer Sooner: Strengthening Family Violence Laws. Retrieved from https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/safer-sooner-report.pdf.

  • Parkinson, P., Cashmore, J., & Single, J. (2011). Post separation conflict and the use of family violence orders. Sydney Law Review, 33(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, A., & Easteal, P. (1999). The ‘domestic’ in stalking. Alternative Law Journal, 24(4), 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. C., & Goodes, R. S. (2014). Statutory interpretation in Australia (8th ed.). Canberra, ACT: LexisNexis Butterworths Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Police Service. (2016). Annual Statistical Review 2015–2016. Retrieved from https://www.police.qld.gov.au/corporatedocs/reportsPublications/statisticalReview/2015-2016.htm.

  • Scott, A., Rajakaruna, N., Sheridan, L., & Gavin, J. (2015). International perceptions of relational stalking: The influence of prior relationship, perpetrator sex, target sex, and participant sex. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(18), 3308–3323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., Lloyd, R., & Gavin, J. (2010). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(11), 1185–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., Rajakaruna, N., Sheridan, L., & Sleath, E. (2013). International perceptions of stalking and responsibility: The influence of prior relationship and severity of behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 220–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2015). Equally Safe: Reforming the Criminal Law to Address Domestic Abuse and Sexual Offences. Retrieved from https://www2.gov.scot/Publications/2015/03/4845/4.

  • Scottish Parliament. (2017). Official Report, 28 September 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sev’er, A. (1997). Recent or imminent separation and intimate violence against women: A conceptual overview and some Canadian examples. Violence Against Women, 3(6), 566–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G. M., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). ‘There’s no smoke without fire’: Are male ex-partners perceived as more ‘entitled’ to stalk than stranger or acquaintance stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., & Scott, A. (2010). Perceptions of harm: Verbal versus physical abuse in stalking scenarios. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(4), 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simester, A. P., & von Hirsch, A. (2011). Crimes, harms, and wrongs: On the principles of criminalisation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senkans, S., McEwan, T., & Ogloff, J. (2017). Assessing the link between intimate partner violence and postrelationship stalking: A gender-inclusive study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, advance online publication,. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517734859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma Violence and Abuse, 3(4), 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in person life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Research Brief. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/169592.pdf.

  • Walker, L., & Meloy, J. R. (1998). Stalking and domestic violence. In J. R. Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & McCulloch, J. (2018). Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M., Hope, L., & Sheridan, L. (2013). Police and public perceptions of stalking: The role of prior victim-offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(2), 320–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J., & McMahon, M. (2000). Stalking: Intervention orders. Paper presented at the Stalking: Criminal Justice Response Conference, Sydney, 7 December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., Burgess, A., Burgess, A., Laszlo, A., McCrary, G., & Douglas, J. (1996). A typology of interpersonal stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Legislation

Cases

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Deakin University, VIC, Australia

    Marilyn McMahon & Paul McGorrery

  2. School of Law and Criminology, University of the Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia

    Kelley Burton

Authors
  1. Marilyn McMahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul McGorrery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelley Burton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn McMahon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Marilyn McMahon

  2. School of Law, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Paul McGorrery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McMahon, M., McGorrery, P., Burton, K. (2020). An Alternative Means of Prosecuting Non-Physical Domestic Abuse: Are Stalking Laws an Under-Utilised Resource?. In: McMahon, M., McGorrery, P. (eds) Criminalising Coercive Control . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0652-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0653-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation