Skip to main content

Alternative Constructions of a Family Violence Offence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Criminalising Coercive Control
  • 4132 Accesses

Abstract

The crime of torture was introduced into the Queensland Criminal Code in 1997. While initially this crime was introduced to respond to a gap in the criminal justice response to child abuse, it has since been used on many occasions in response to cases involving domestic and family violence. This chapter tracks the introduction of the crime of torture into Queensland law and reviews case law and sentencing data to show how it has been applied in the context of domestic and family violence. In the context of increased recognition of the serious impact of non-physical forms of family violence, it shows how the crime of torture can be applied to cases of domestic and family violence that do not involve physical abuse. Drawing on case studies, the chapter also identifies shortcomings of the offence and explores the possibility of the introduction of a less serious version of the offence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pseudonyms are used when referring to the participants’ comments to protect their anonymity. Thanks to the women who shared their stories for this research and to Dr. Jennifer Bell for research assistance. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council's Future Fellowship scheme (project number FT140100796). For more information about this study see: <https://law.uq.edu.au/research/our-research/using-law-and-leaving-domestic-violence-project/using-law-and-leaving-domestic-violence>.

References

  • Allimant, A., & Ostapiej-Piatkowski, B. (2011). Supporting Women from CALD Backgrounds who are Victim/Survivors of Sexual Abuse, ACSSA Wrap No 9. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-documents/w9.pdf.

  • Ashworth, A. (2009). Principles of criminal law (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinson, V., & Bishop, C. (2015). Is the creation of a discrete offence of coercive control necessary to combat domestic violence? Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 66(2), 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, J. (2018, January 24). Nine years jail for man who hit pregnant partner with a hammer. Brisbane Times. Retrieved from https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/nine-years-jail-for-man-who-hit-pregnant-partner-with-a-hammer-20180124-p4yyu9.html.

  • Chalmers, J., & Leverick, F. (2008). Fair labelling in criminal law. Modern Law Review, 71(2), 217–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, N. (2019, forthcoming). The feminist expansion of the prohibition of torture: Towards a post-liberal international human rights law? Cornell International Law Journal, 1-–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2003). Crime in the intimate sphere: Prosecutions of intimate partner violence. Newcastle Law Review, 7(2), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2015). Do we need a specific domestic violence offence? Melbourne University Law Review, 39(2), 434–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H., Barrett, M., & Higgins, E. (2017). Criminal process in Queensland. Sydney, NSW: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak, D. (2008). Overcriminalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutin, J., Russell, R., & Reid, M. (2017). Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 41(3), 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NewsMail. (2017, December 11). Torture felt like being in car crash, says victim. NewsMail. Retrived from https://www.news-mail.com.au/news/torture-felt-like-being-in-car-crash-says-victim/3287228/.

  • Oberhardt, M. (1997, May 14). Jail term cut for tot assault. Courier Mail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhardt, M. (1996, November 5). Stepdad ‘zapped’ boy, 5. Courier Mail.

    Google Scholar 

  • QSAC: Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council. (2018). ‘Torture Statistics’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, 19 March 1997 (Frank Carroll).

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, 18 March 1997 (Naomi Wilson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Taskforce on Women and the Criminal Code. (2000). Report of the Taskforce on Women and the Criminal Code. Retrieved from http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/463022/report-of-the-taskforce-on-organised-crime-legislation.pdf.

  • Sackett, L., & Saunders, D. (1999). The impact of different forms of psychological abuse on battered women. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, L. (2018). Criminalising private torture as feminist strategy: Thinking through the implications. In K. Fitz-Gibbon, S. Walklate, J. McCulloch, & J. Maher (Eds.), Intimate partner violence, risk and security: Securing women’s lives in a global world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlow, T. (2016). Criminalizing ‘private’ torture. William and Mary Law Review, 58, 183–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1984). Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Cat.aspx.

  • United Nations Treaty Collection. (2018). Status of Treaties: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Retrieved from https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en.

  • Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & McCulloch, J. (2018). Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through reform of legal categories. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, C. (2017). What is ‘invisible in plain sight’: Policing coercive control. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 56(4), 500–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Legislation

Cases

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Douglas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Douglas, H. (2020). Alternative Constructions of a Family Violence Offence. In: McMahon, M., McGorrery, P. (eds) Criminalising Coercive Control . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0652-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0653-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics