Skip to main content

Criminalising Coercive Control: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Criminalising Coercive Control

Abstract

Novel criminal offences introduced in England and Wales in 2015, and in Scotland and Ireland in 2018, criminalise non-physical abuse in the context of family relationships in distinctive ways: they criminalise conduct that causes, or is intended to cause, psychological or economic harm without necessarily requiring that a victim sustain physical injury or fear death or serious physical harm. In Tasmania (Australia) related offences had been introduced a decade earlier. These significant and distinctive extensions of the criminal law apply to certain current or past familial relationships and supplement other criminal legislation that penalises physical assault, stalking or other offending against intimate partners or other family members. The new offences were designed to protect human rights by addressing gaps in the criminal law, gaps which permitted significant harmful activities to previously go unpunished. In the context of the ongoing debate about how best to tackle the problem of family violence, these developments raise significant legal issues—theoretical and practical—in relation to how best to protect victims. This chapter presents an overview of the offences, locates them within contemporary developments in the criminal law and identifies key matters that must be taken into account when evaluating them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambos, K. (2015). The overall function of the international criminal law: Striking the right balance between the rechtsgut and the harm principles. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 9(2), 301–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., & Pape, K. T. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2014). Specialist Homelessness Services: 2013–2014. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Retrieved from www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129549998.

  • Bagshaw, D., Thea, B., Wendt, S., Campbell, A., McInnes, E., Tinning, B., & Arias, P. F. (2010). Family violence and family law in Australia: The experiences and views of children and adults from families who separated post-1995 and post-2006. Canberra: Commonwealth Attorney General’s Department. Retrieved from https://www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/Families/FamilyViolence/Documents/Family%20violence%20and%20family%20law%20in%20Australia%20volume%201.pdf.

  • Baldry, A. (2003). ‘Stick and stones hurt my bones but his glance and words hurt more’: The impact of psychological abuse and physical violence by current and former partners on battered women in Italy. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, C., Johnson, K., & Walklate, S. (2018). The coercive control offence and implications for the policing of domestic abuse. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Society of Criminology, Melbourne, 7 December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, E. (2007). The sexual politics of ‘new abolitionism’. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 18(3), 128–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, E. (2012). Carceral politics as gender justice? The ‘traffic in women’ and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights. Theory and Society, 41(3), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinson, V., & Bishop, C. (2015). Is the creation of a discrete offence of coercive control necessary to combat domestic violence? Northern Ireland Law Quarterly, 66(2), 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C., & Bettinson, V. (2017). Evidencing domestic violence, including behaviour that falls under the new offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 22(2), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, R. (2015, March 8). Domestic violence perpetrators using non-physical abuse ‘to avoid being caught’. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-08/domestic-violence-perpetrators-using-non-physical-abuse-to-avoi/6289278.

  • Brooks, L. (2018, February 1). Scotland set to pass ‘gold standard’ domestic abuse law. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society//feb/01scotland-set-to-pass-gold-standard-domestic-abuse-law.

  • Burke, A. (2007). Domestic violence as a crime of pattern and intent: An alternative reconceptualization. George Washington Law Review, 75(3), 552–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, M., & Brooks-Hay, O. (2018). Aligning policy and law? The creation of a domestic abuse offence incorporating coercive control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J. (2014). Frenzied law making: Overcriminalization by numbers. Current Legal Problems, 67(1), 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J., & Leverick, F. (2008). Fair labelling in criminal law. Modern Law Review, 71(2), 217–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (1991). Patriarchy, prisons, and jails: A critical look at trends in women’s incarceration. The Prison Journal, 71(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbe, F. (1878). Wife-Torture in England. London: Contemporary Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Bethea, L., King, M. R., & McKeown, R. E. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archives of Family Medicine, 9(5), 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2011). Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16800848e.

  • Crowell, N. A., & Burgess, A. W. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service. (n.d.). Offences against the Person, Incorporating the charging standard: Assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Retrieved from https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/offences-against-person-incorporating-charging-standard.

  • Crown Prosecution Service. (2015). DPP: Controlling and coercive behaviour can ‘limit victims’ basic human rights’ as new domestic abuse law introduced. Previously available at http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/new_domestic_abuse_law_introduced/.

  • Crown Prosecution Service. (2017). Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. Retrieved from https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/controlling-or-coercive-behaviour-intimate-or-family-relationship.

  • Cunneen, C. (2010). Alternative and improved responses to domestic and family violence in queensland indigenous communities. Brisbane, QLD: Department of Communities Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice and Industrial Relations (Tas). (2003). Safe at Home: A Criminal Justice Framework for Responding to Family Violence in Tasmania. Options Paper. Tasmania: Tasmanian Government. Retrieved from https://www.safeathome.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/28374/Options_Paper.pdf.

  • Devries, K., Watt, C., Yoshihama, M., Kiss, L., Schraiber, K. L., Deyessa, N., Heise, L., Durand, J., Jansen, M., Berhane, Y., Ellsberg, M., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2011). Violence against women is strongly associated with suicide attempts: Evidence from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Social Science & Medicine, 73(1), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1998). Rethinking violence against women. London: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2007). Not a crime like any other: Sentencing breaches of domestic violence protection orders. Criminal Law Journal, 31(4), 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2015). Do we need a specific domestic violence offence? Melbourne University Law Review, 39(4), 434–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H., & Stark, T. (2010). Stories from survivors: Domestic violence and criminal justice interventions. Brisbane: T.C. Bierne School of Law, University of Queensland. Retrieved from https://law.uq.edu.au/files/12453/Stories-From-Survivors-Douglas-Stark.pdf.

  • Dowling, C., Morgan, A., Hulme, S., Manning, M., & Wong, G. (2018). Protection orders for domestic violence: A systematic review, Trends & Issues in Criminal Justice no. 551, Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M., & Goodman, L. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11–12), 743–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Walklate, S. (2018). Coercive control: A clinical or legal concept? Problems and possibilities. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Society of Criminology, Melbourne, 7 December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R. (2009). The impact of psychological aggression on women’s mental health and behavior. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10(3), 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D., Rutledge, L., Berg, B., Hause, E., & Polek, D. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, l., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368, 1260–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, L. (2009). The case for a criminal law theory of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Criminal Law Brief, 5(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, M. (2015). Caught: The prison state and the lockdown of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (2008). On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hessbruegge, J. (2004). The historical development of the doctrines of attribution and due diligence in international law. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 36(4), 265–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. (2016, September 1). Police failing to use new law against coercive domestic abuse. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society//aug/31/police-failing-to-use-new-law-against-coercive-domestic-abuse.

  • Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49(2), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, P. (1984). Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers. Women in Therapy, 3(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R. (2017). Criminology, globalization and human rights. In L. Weber, E. Fishwick, & M. Marmo (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of criminology and human rights. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2010). Call to End Violence Against Women and Girls: Action Plan 2011. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/118153/vawg-action-plan.pdf.

  • Home Office. (2014). Strengthening the Law on Domestic Abuse Consultation Summary of Responses. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/389002/StrengtheningLawDomesticAbuseResponses.pdf.

  • Home Office. (2015). Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship: Statutory Guidance Framework. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/482528/Controlling_or_coercive_behaviour_-_statutory_guidance.pdf.

  • Hudson, B. (1998). Restorative justice: The challenge of sexual and racial violence. Journal of Law and Society, 25(2), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N., & Zedner, L. (2012). Legal constructions of crime. In Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libal, K., & Parekh, S. (2009). Reframing violence against women as a human rights violation: Evan Stark’s coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1477–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (2008). Positive obligations and gender-based violence: Judicial developments. International Community Law Review, 10(2), 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1998). Retribution revisited: A reconsideration of feminist criminal law reform strategies. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 36(1), 151–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, M., Weaver, T., & Resick, P. (2008). Mental health consequences of intimate partner abuse: A multidimensional assessment of four different forms of abuse. Violence Against Women, 14(6), 634–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. (2003). Rights talk and the experience of law: Implementing women’s human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2), 343–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGorrery, P., & McMahon, M. (2018). Prosecutions of controlling or coercive behaviour in England and Wales. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Society of Criminology, Melbourne, 8 December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M., & McGorrery, P. (2016). Criminalising economic and emotional abuse and intimidation: The Tasmanian experience. University of Tasmania Law Review, 36(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuigg, R. (2011). International human rights law and domestic violence: The effectiveness of international human rights law. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monckton-Smith, J., Szymanska, K., & Haile, S. (2017). Exploring the Relationship between Stalking and Homicide. Gloucester: Suzy Lamplugh Trust. Retrieved from http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4553/.

  • Neate, P. (2015, December 29). Women’s Aid welcomes coercive control law. Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.womensaid.org.uk/womens-aid-welcomes-coercive-control-law/.

  • North, C. (2015). The classification of hysteria and related disorders: Historical and phenomenological considerations. Behavioral sciences, 5(4), 496–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, D. (1999). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence research. Victims and Violence, 14(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padfield, N. (2016). Editorial: Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. Criminal Law Review, 3, 149–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: The making of American social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2001). How should human rights be conceived? In P. Hayden (Ed.), The philosophy of human rights. Paragon Hose: St Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polavarapu, A. (2018). Global carceral feminism and domestic violence: What the west can learn from reconciliation in Uganda. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, (forthcoming). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3188271.

  • Robertson, N., Busch, R., D’Souza, R., Lam Sheung, F., Anand, R., Balzer, R., & Paina, D. (2007). Living at the cutting edge: Women’s experiences of protection orders. Volume 2: What’s to be done? A critical analysis of statutory and practice approaches to domestic violence. Wellington: University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römkens, R. (2001). Law as a trojan horse: Unintended consequences of rights-based interventions to support battered women. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 13(2), 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into Family Violence. (2016). Report and Recommendations, Vol III. Retrieved from http://www.rcfv.com.au/Report-Recommendations.

  • Sackett, L. A., & Saunders, D. G. (1999). The impact of different forms of psychological abuse on battered women. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelong, K. M. (1994). Domestic violence and the state: Response to and rationales for spousal battering, marital rape and stalking. Marquette Law Review, 78(1), 79–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2014). Equally Safe: Scotland’s Strategy for Preventing and Eradicating Violence Against Women and Girls. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2014/06/7483.

  • Scottish Government. (2015). Equally Safe: Reforming the Criminal Law to Address Domestic Abuse and Sexual Offences. A Scottish Government Consultation Paper. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/03/4845/0.

  • Scottish Government. (2018a). Protective Orders for People at Risk of Domestic Abuse: Consultation. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/consultation-protective-orders-people-risk-domestic-abuse/pages/2/.

  • Scottish Government, (2018b). Equally Safe: Scotland’s Strategy to Eradicate Violence Against Women. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/equally-safe-scotlands-strategy-prevent-eradicate-violence-against-women-girls/.

  • Sentencing Advisory Council (Vic). (2009). Sentencing Practices for Breach of Family Violence Intervention Orders: Final Report. Retrieved from https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/publications/sentencing-practices-breach-of-family-violence-intervention-orders-final-report.

  • Sheridan, J. B., & Bakewell, J. W. (1879). The magistrates’ guide. Adelaide, SA: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, R. B. (1995). ‘The rule of love’: Wife beating as prerogative and privacy. Yale Law Journal, 105(8), 2117–2207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simester, A. P., Spencer, J. R., Sullivan, G. R., & Virgo, G. J. (2010). Simester and sullivan’s criminal law: Theory and doctrine. London: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L. (1998). Toward safer societies: Punishment, masculinities and violence against women. British Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland. (2015). Not now, not ever: Putting an end to domestic and family violence in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Government. Retrieved from http://www.qld.gov.au/community/documents/getting-support-health-social-issue/dfv-report-vol-one.pdf.

  • Stannard, J. (2010). Sticks, stones and words: Emotional harm and the English criminal law. Criminal Law Review, 74(6), 533–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2016). Coercive control. Paper presented at the Chance for Change Conference, Nottinghamshire, 9 March 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2012). Coercive control. In N. Lombard & L. McMillan (Eds.), Violence against women: Current theory and practice in domestic abuse. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (1995). Re-presenting woman battering: From battered woman syndrome to coercive control. Albany Law Review, 58(4), 973–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2009). Rethinking coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1509–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, A. E., & Arias, I. (2001). Psychological abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder in battered women: Examining the roles of shame and guilt. Violence and Victims, 16(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straight, E., Harper, F., & Arias, I. (2003). The impact of partner psychological abuse on health behaviors and health status in college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(9), 1035–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. (2002). Domestic violence and women’s safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadros, V. (2005). The distinctiveness of domestic abuse: A freedom based account. Louisiana Law Review, 65(3), 989–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2018). Anti-carceral feminism and sexual assault—A defence. Social Philosophy Today, 34, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, J. (2018). Coercive control: To criminalize or not to criminalize? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, A. (2014, December 19). Domestic abuse charity criticises May’s law criminalising coercive behaviour. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/dec/18/theresa-may-domestic-abuse-offence-coercive-behaviour.

  • Tuerkheimer, D. (2004). Recognizing and remedying the crime of battering: A call to criminalize domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 94(4), 959–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hempen, P. (2014). Introduction—Criminal law and human rights. In Criminal Law & Human Rights (Eds.), van Hempen, P. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • VicHealth. (2004). The Health Costs of Violence: Measuring the Burden Of Disease Caused by Intimate Partner Violence. Retrieved from https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/media-and-resources/publications/the-health-costs-of-violence.

  • Walby, S., & Towers, J. S. (2018). Untangling the concept of coercive control: Theorizing domestic violent crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & McCulloch, J. (2018). Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, N. (2014, May 30). Domestic violence: Victims call for tougher laws to combat abuse. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-30/victims-call-for-introduction-of-tougher-laws-to-combat-abuse/5474070.

  • Williamson, E. (2010). Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: Negotiating the unreality of coercive control. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1412–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Legal Service Victoria. (2018). ‘Officer she’s psychotic and I need protection’: Police misidentification of the ‘primary aggressor’ in family violence incidents in Victoria. Retrieved from https://www.womenslegal.org.au/files/file/WLSV%20Policy%20Brief%201%20MisID%20July%202018.pdf.

Legislation

Cases

Other materials

  • Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn McMahon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McMahon, M., McGorrery, P. (2020). Criminalising Coercive Control: An Introduction. In: McMahon, M., McGorrery, P. (eds) Criminalising Coercive Control . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0653-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0652-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0653-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics