Skip to main content

How to Be Fair in Prioritizing Support in the Aftermath of Disasters: Pakistan’s Housing Reconstruction Challenges Following the 2010 Flood Disaster

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Hazards and Disaster Justice

Abstract

Following the disastrous 2010 floods, where almost one million homes were totally destroyed, Pakistan’s government has had to face $2 billion of reconstruction costs. With a given reconstruction budget, reducing households’ vulnerability to flooding generated difficult decisions, where a greater weight given to the poorest also meant achieving less total protection—a typical case of social equity vs. resource use efficiency. This study shows the hidden complexity of such decision-making when there is urgency in disaster relief. Surprisingly, it turns out that in resource-constrained situations typical of developing countries, the choice of equity or justice norms matter little for how to best use the available budget. The determining factor is the interplay of reconstruction costs with both the government’s and households’ available budgets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, I. (2011). An Overview of Post-Disaster Permanent Housing Reconstruction in Developing Countries. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2(2), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azeem, M. M. (2016). From Static One-Dimensional Poverty to Vulnerability to Multi-Dimensional Poverty: Towards Greater Effectiveness of Social Protection in Pakistan. PhD dissertation, The University of Western Australia, 202 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, S. (2003). Housing Reconstruction After Conflict and Disaster. Humanitarian Policy Group, Network Papers, 43, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazorla, M., & Toman, M. (2000). International Equity and Climate Change Policy. Climate Policy Brief No. 27, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (22 p.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, P., & Shrader, E. (2000). Gender and Post-Disaster Reconstruction: The Case of Hurricane Mitch in Honduras and Nicaragua. Decision Review Draft. Washington, DC: LCSPG/LAC Gender Team, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyne Barenstein, J. E. (2015). Continuity and Change in Housing and Settlement Patterns in Post-Earthquake Gujarat, India. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(2), 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, C. S. (2010). An Examination of Decision Making in Post Disaster Housing Reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(1), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., & Olshansky, R. B. (2014). The Theory and Practice of Building Back Better. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, A., & Baldwin, C. (2017). Voice, Power, and History: Ensuring Social Justice for All Stakeholders in Water Decision-Making. Local Environment, 22(9), 1042–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannakkara, S., & Wilkinson, S. (2014). Re-Conceptualising ‘Building Back Better’ to Improve Post-Disaster Recovery. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(3), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, M., Chiara Pino, M., Peretti, S., Scolta, K., & Mazzarelli, E. (2014). Satisfaction Level on Quality of Life Post-Earthquake Rebuilding. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(1), 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25(1), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1990). Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction and Social Inequality: A Challenge to Policy and Practice. Disasters, 14(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdyke, A., Lepropre, F., Javernick-Will, A., & Koschmann, M. (2017). Inter-Organizational Resource Coordination in Post-Disaster Infrastructure Recovery. Construction Management and Economics, 35(8–9), 514–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophiyandri, T., Amaratunga, D., Pathirage, C., & Keraminiyage, K. (2013). Critical Success Factors for Community-Based Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction Projects in the Pre-Construction Stage in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(2), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S., & Hastak, M. (2013). A Framework to Construct Post-Disaster Housing. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, P. J. (2013). Post-Disaster Reconstruction: A Current Analysis of Gujarat’s Response After the 2001 Earthquake. In Beyond Shelter After Disaster: Practice, Process and Possibilities (pp. 40–53). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmayati, Y. (2016). Reframing ‘Building Back Better’ for Post-Disaster Housing Design: A Community Perspective. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(4), 344–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringius, L., Torvanger, A., & Underdal, A. (2002). Burden Sharing and Fairness Principles in International Climate Policy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, H., & Albornoz, C. (2016). Socio-Political Goals and Responses to the Reconstruction of the Chilean City of Constitución. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilizzi, S., & Black, J. (2009). Breaking Through the Equity Barrier in Environmental Policy. Land and Water Australia, Canberra, 172 p. Retrieved from http://lwa.gov.au/products/pn21249

  • Tran, T. A. (2015). Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction as a Significant Opportunity to Building Disaster Resilience: A Case in Vietnam. Natural Hazards, 79(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahanvati, M., & Mulligan, M. (2017). A New Model for Effective Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction: Lessons from Gujarat and Bihar in India. International Journal of Project Management, 35(5), 802–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Pakistan Floods 2010: Preliminary Damage and Needs Assessment Project. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Schilizzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8.7 Details behind in-text Table 8.5 (The role of different equity norms on allocations and final household budgets)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schilizzi, S., Azeem, M.M. (2020). How to Be Fair in Prioritizing Support in the Aftermath of Disasters: Pakistan’s Housing Reconstruction Challenges Following the 2010 Flood Disaster. In: Lukasiewicz, A., Baldwin, C. (eds) Natural Hazards and Disaster Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0466-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0466-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0465-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0466-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics