Skip to main content

Ethical Standards for Tax Advisers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Taxation
  • 1083 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter the author reviews the renewed emphasis on tax adviser ethics that is evident in the early 21st Century. The chapter identifies some of the reasons for this emphasis and some of the administrative responses to the involvement of advisers in less acceptable forms of tax planning. The chapter notes signs of a divergence (without concluding that there has been complete separation) of ethics between tax advisers in the legal profession and others. In the course of doing so the chapter identifies the key responsibilities borne by tax advisers to their clients and to society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a commentary on the tax advising profession in the United States of America see Rose (2011).

  2. 2.

    See Furness (2012) “…treasury minister MP David Gauke told the BBC’s World at One he agreed such tax avoidance schemes were ‘morally repugnant’”.

  3. 3.

    Issue 1275 12 November 2010, http://www.private-eye.co.uk/sections.php?section_link=in_the_back&issue=1275.

  4. 4.

    See Facebook “Boycott Vodafone until they repay their 6bn tax bill” 29 October 2010, https://www.facebook.com/Boycott-Vodafone-until-they-repay-their-6bn-tax-bill-153153704726686/.

  5. 5.

    “UK Uncut targets Topshop and Vodafone over tax arrangements: Movement invades stores in push for government to tax the rich and big companies more instead of making budget cuts”, The Guardian 4 December 2010, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/dec/04/uk-uncut-protest-topshop-vodafone; Ben Leach and Alastair Jamieson, “Marks and Spencer targeted as tax protests widen” The Telegraph, 19 December 2019, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8212040/Marks-and-Spencer-targeted-as-tax-protests-widen.html.

  6. 6.

    See Tom Bergin, Reuters, 1 February 2013, https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britian-tax-accountants/mps-press-accountants-on-tax-avoidance-idUKBRE90U0SG20130131.

  7. 7.

    See https://www.ato.gov.au/General/The-fight-against-tax-crime/Our-focus/Project-Wickenby-task-force/.

  8. 8.

    See https://www.cdpp.gov.au/crimes-we-prosecute/fraud/project-wickenby.

  9. 9.

    https://www.icij.org/investigations/panama-papers/.

  10. 10.

    The reference is to “Product rulings” which are public indications (binding on the ATO) of how the tax law applicable to a particular tax preferred investment will be applied. The example typical of the period in question is that of agricultural schemes designed to promote investment in particular types of crop such as olive tree plantations; forestry plantations etc.

  11. 11.

    Clause 3.50 Explanatory Memorandum Tax Laws Amendment (2006 Measures No. 1) Bill 2006.

  12. 12.

    POTAS is found in Part 5 of the Finance Act 2014.

  13. 13.

    Leary v FCT (High Court) 80 ATC 4452–4453.

  14. 14.

    Walker v Hungerfords (1987) 19 ATR 745.

  15. 15.

    Bell v Vahexi Pty Ltd 99 ATC 4055.

  16. 16.

    Symond v Gadens Lawyers Sydney Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 955.

  17. 17.

    The bodies are the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT); Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA); Association of Taxation Technicians (ATT); Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT); Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW); Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS); and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP).

  18. 18.

    Section 30-10 (11) & (12) Tax Agents Services Act 2009.

  19. 19.

    Section 30-10 (1) Tax Agents Services Act 2009.

  20. 20.

    Section 30-10 (4) Tax Agents Services Act 2009.

  21. 21.

    Section 30-10 (10) Tax Agents Services Act 2009.

  22. 22.

    Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, CPA Australia and the Institute of Public Accountants.

  23. 23.

    Para 5.1 APES 220.

  24. 24.

    Para 5.2 APES 220.

  25. 25.

    Para 5.4 APES 220.

  26. 26.

    Para 5.5 APES 220.

  27. 27.

    More vague because there is no definition of public interest in the Standard.

References

  • Australian Senate Economics References Committee. 2018. Corporate tax avoidance: Much heat little light so far.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, David. 2016. Tax avoidance—a view from the Dark Side. Melbourne University Law Review 39 (3): 950–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Richard. 2019. Tax, Lies, and Videotape. Private Eye Special Report Issue 1494. http://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1494/special-reports/tax-lies-and-videotape.

  • Cadesky, Michael, Ian Hayes, and David Russell. 2013. Towards Greater Fairness in Taxation—A Model Taxpayer Charter Preliminary Report. Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (Final version 2016. Amsterdam: IBFD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Katherine, and Duane Helleloid. 2016. Starbucks: Social Responsibility And Tax Avoidance. Journal of Accounting Education 37: 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIOT et al. 2017. (Republished 2019). Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIOT et al. 2019. PCRT help sheet B: Tax Advice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Nick. 2010, November 14. How Vodafone Made Tax Dodging Respectable. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Judith. 2004. Defining Taxpayer Responsibility: In Support Of A General Anti Avoidance Principle. 4 British Tax Review: 332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, Hannah, and Christopher Hope. 2012, June 19. Jimmy Carr tax avoidance scheme investigated by HMRC. The Telegraph.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMRC. 2015. Guidance Promoters of Tax Avoidance Schemes (POTAS).

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts. 2013. Tax Avoidance: The Role of Large Accountancy Firms. Forty-fourth Report of Session 2012–13, HC 870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, Ben and Alastair Jamieson. 2019, December 19. Marks and Spencer Targeted as Tax Protests Widen. The Telegraph, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8212040/Marks-and-Spencer-targeted-as-tax-protests-widen.html.

  • Mason, Anthony. 1975. Where Now? Australian Law Journal 49: 570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, Ed. 2010, October 28. Vodafone Closes Oxford St Store at £6bn Tax Protest. This is Money.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Charles A. 2011. Tax Lawyer’s Dilemma: Recent Developments Heighten Tax Lawyer Responsibilities and Liabilities. Columbia Business Law Review 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatcroft, George S.A. 1955. The Attitude of the Legislature and the Courts to Tax Avoidance. Modern Law Review 18 (3): 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Walpole .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walpole, M. (2020). Ethical Standards for Tax Advisers. In: van Brederode, R. (eds) Ethics and Taxation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0088-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0089-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics