Abstract
The introductory chapter sets out the notion of the Anthropocene, offering a broad overview of how it has been conceptualised within cultural geography, arts, humanities, and social sciences. The chapter explores how local and global scales and boundaries are re-positioned through movement and mobility, which in turn increases the need for attention to the way that humans interact with each other and the world. It brings the key methods and inquiries of the book into focus using them to explore this significant epoch of changes: art practice, mobility, and participatory geographies. The notion of “creative measures” is introduced as a way to recognise and counteract the precariousness of living in a world or multiple, unstable, and shifting measures are in need of a process by which to move through and adapt to this unstable ground.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adey, P., Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P., & Sheller, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of mobilities. New York: Routledge.
Amin, A. (2014). Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7/8), 137–161.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing like a city. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Farnham: Ashgate.
Anderson, B., & Ash, J. (2015). Atmospheric methods. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 34–51). New York and Oxon: Routledge.
Askins, K., & Pain, R. (2011). Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 803–821.
Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2007). Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry. London: I.B. Tauris.
Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (Eds.). (2013). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
Barry, K., & Keane, J. (2017). Moving within mobilities: Expanding spatial experiences through the artwork PAN & ZOOM. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 67–84.
Baum, K. (Ed.). (2010). Nobody’s property: Art, land, space, 2000–2010. New Haven: Princeton University Art Museum.
Bissell, D. (2009). Inconsequential materialities: The movement of lost effects. Space and Culture, 12(1), 95–115.
Boyd. C. (2017). Non-representational geographies of therapeutic art making. London, UK: Palgrave.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Büscher, M., Sheller, M., & Tyfield, D. (2016). Mobility intersections: Social research, social futures. Mobilities, 11(4), 485–497.
Carrington, D. (2016, November 4). Your carbon footprint destroys 30 square meters of Arctic sea ice a year. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/03/your-carbon-footprint-destroys-30-square-metres-of-arctic-sea-ice-a-year?CMP=share_btn_tw.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. IGBP Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
Dalby, S. (2013). Biopolitics and climate security in the Anthropocene. Geoforum, 49, 184–192.
Davis, H., & Turpin, E. (Eds.). (2015). Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies. London: Open Humanities Press.
Demos, T. J. (2017). Against the Anthropocene: Visual culture and environment today. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Dewsbury, J. D. (2010). Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In D. DeLyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative geography (pp. 321–334). London: Sage.
Doughty, K., Duffy, M., & Harada, T. (2016). Practices of emotional and affective geographies of sound. Emotion, Space and Society, 20, 39–41.
Duffy, M. (2013). The requirement of having a body. Geographical Research, 51(2), 130–136.
Duffy, M., Waitt, G., & Harada, T. (2016). Making sense of sound: Visceral sonic mapping as a research tool. Emotion, Space and Society, 20, 49–57.
Edensor, T. (Ed.). (2010). Geographies of rhythm: Nature, place, mobilities and bodies. Farnham: Ashgate.
Faulconbridge, J., & Hui, A. (2016). Traces of a mobile field: Ten years of mobilities research. Mobilities, 11(1), 1–14.
Fincham, B., McGuinness, M., & Murray, L. (Eds.). (2010). Mobile methodologies. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Gallagher, M. (2016). Sound as affect: Difference, power and spatiality. Emotion, Space and Society, 20, 42–48.
Gibson, K., Rose, D. B., & Fincher, R. (Eds.). (2015). Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
Gren, M., & Huijbens, E. H. (Eds.). (2016). Tourism and the Anthropocene. London and New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
IPCC. (2018). Summary for policy makers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/07/SR15_SPM_High_Res.pdf.
Jensen, O. B., & Lanng, D. B. (2017). Mobilities design: Urban designs for mobile situations. London: Routledge.
Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol: Polity Press.
Keane, J. (2007). Situating “situatedness” through Æffect and the architectural body of Arakawa and Gins. Janus Head Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Continental Philosophy, 9(2), 438–457.
Keane, J. (2012). Æffect: Initiating heuristic life. In B. Bolt & E. Barrett (Eds.), Carnal knowledge: Towards a new materialism through the arts (pp. 41–61). London: I.B. Tauris.
Kjaerulff, A. A., Kesselring, S., Peters, P., & Hannam, K. (Eds.). (2018). Envisioning networked urban mobilities: Art, performances, impacts. New York: Routledge.
Larner, W. (2011). C-change? Geographies of crisis. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1(3), 319–335.
Latimer, J., & Miele, M. (2013). Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human. Theory Culture & Society, 30(7/8), 5–31.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519, 171–180.
Lobo, M. (2014). Affective energies: Sensory bodies on the beach in Darwin, Australia. Emotion, Space and Society, 12, 101–109.
Longhurst, R., Ho, E., & Johnston, L. (2008). Using “the body” as an “instrument of research”: Kimch’i and pavlova. Area, 40, 208–217.
Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography, 32(4), 551–559.
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Merriman, P. (2016). Mobility infrastructures: Modern visions, affective environments and the problem of car parking. Mobilities, 11(1), 83–98.
Merriman, P., Revill, G., Cresswell, T., Lorimer, H., Matless, D., Rose, G., & Wylie, J. (2008). Landscape, mobility, practice. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(2), 191–212.
Mooney, C., & Samenow, J. (2017). The North Pole is an insane 36 degrees warmer than normal as winter descends. The Washington Post, 17 November 2016. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/11/17/the-north-pole-is-an-insane-36-degrees-warmer-than-normal-as-winter-descends/?utm_term=.83013995f1cb.
Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Morton, T. (2018). Being ecological. London: Pelican.
Mould, O. (2018). Against creativity. London: Verso.
Muecke, S. (2007). Hurricane Katrina and the rhetoric of natural disasters. In E. Potter, A. Mackinnon, S. McKenzie, & J. McKay (Eds.), Fresh water: New perspectives on water in Australia (pp. 259–271). Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., et al. (2013). Reconceptualizing the “Anthropos” in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy, 28, 3–13.
Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life: Practices and places. London: Sage.
Scarles, C. (2010). Where words fail, visual ignite: Opportunities for visual autoethnography in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 905–926.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10–25.
Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. London: Open Humanities Press.
Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
UNHCR. (2018). Figures at a glance. United Nations Higher Commission for Refugees. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html.
UNWTO. (2018). UNWTO Tourism Highlights: 2017 edition. United Nations World Tourism Organisation.
Urry, J. (2016). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Vannini, P. (2014). Non-representational ethnography: New ways of animating lifeworlds. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 317–327.
Vannini, P. (Ed.). (2015). Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research. New York: Routledge.
Witzgall, S. (2013). Mobility and the image-based research of art. In S. Witzgall, G. Vogl, & S. Kesselring (Eds.), New mobilities regimes in art and social sciences (pp. 7–16). Farnham: Ashgate.
Witzgall, S., Vogl, G., & Kesselring, S. (Eds.). (2013). New mobilities regimes in art and social sciences. Farnham: Ashgate.
Whatmore, S. J. (2013). Earthly powers and affective environments: An ontological politics of flood risk. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7/8), 33–50.
World Meteorological Organisation. (2018, November 29). WMO climate statement: Past 4 years warmest on record [Press release]. Available at: https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/wmo-climate-statement-past-4-years-warmest-record.
Zurkow, M. (2014). The Petroleum Manga: A project by Marina Zurkow. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barry, K., Keane, J. (2019). Measure and Method. In: Creative Measures of the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9648-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9648-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9647-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9648-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)