Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological Restoration as a Legal Duty in the Anthropocene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Charting Environmental Law Futures in the Anthropocene

Abstract

Ecological restoration provides an important way to address the ongoing biodiversity crisis and other exceedance of safe planetary boundaries. However, the Anthropocene poses challenges for ecological restoration, such as determining the (historical) reference system. In light of these challenges, some have proposed concepts such as novel ecosystems. This concept however lacks clarity and seems superfluous. It could also be abused to undermine restoration commitments. The Anthropocene also makes restoration more challenging from a legal perspective. Although there is a legal duty to restore in international law, restoration commitments have not been reached. The international legal framework lacks concrete definitions and guidance for ecological restoration. In order to fulfill their duty to restore, states are obliged to take sufficient measures to attain a high level of restoration. Possible ways to advance ecological restoration in the Anthropocene could include new legislation and principles and standards for restoration. Also, bolder steps are necessary, such as a substantial increase in the protection and restoration of nature towards half of the planet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison S (2012) Ecological restoration and environmental change. Renewing damaged ecosystems. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison S (2017) Ecological restoration and environmental change. In: Allison S, Murphy S (eds) Routledge handbook of ecological and environmental restoration. Routledge, pp 485–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson J, Alexander S (2013) Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: time to roll up our sleeves. Restor Ecol 3:293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer L, Escudero A, Martín-Duque JF, Mola I, Aronson J (2014) The historical reference in restoration ecology: re-defining a cornerstone concept. Biol Cons 176:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastmeijer K (2016) Ecological restoration in international biodiversity law: a promising strategy to address our failure to prevent? In: Bowman MJS, Davies P, Goodwin EJ (eds) Research handbook on biodiversity and law. Edgar Elgar, pp 387–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater P, Laurie Y (2013) The policy context: building laws and rules that embrace novelty. In: Hobbs R, Higgs E, Hall C (eds) Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 272–283

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) COP Decision X/2. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2012) COP Decision XI/16, Ecosystem restoration

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2014) COP Decision XII/19. Ecosystem conservation and restoration

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2016) COP Decision XIII/5. Ecosystem restoration: short-term action plan

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2019) Synthesis of views of parties and observers on the scope and content of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. CBD/POST2020/PREP/1/INF/1, 24 Jan 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 5:e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Ehrlich, PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. PNAS 30:E6089–E6096. Published ahead of print 10 July 2017. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliquet A (2017) International law and policy on restoration. In: Allison S, Murphy S (eds) Routledge handbook of ecological and environmental restoration. Routledge, pp 387–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliquet A, Decleer K (2017) Halting and restoring species loss: incorporating the concepts of extinction debt, ecological trap and dark diversity into conservation and restoration law. Griffith Law Rev 2:178–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2017.1355873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1992) Rio de Janeiro, 5 June 1992. http://www.cbd.int

  • Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) (1979) Bonn, 23 June 1979. http://www.cms.int

  • Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. IGBP Newslett 41:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot D, Rudolf S, Blignaut J, Van Der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Elmqvist T, Farley J (2013) Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration. Conserv Biol 6:1286–1293

    Google Scholar 

  • DG Environment (2017) Reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: explanatory notes and guidelines for the period 2013–2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E et al (2017) An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 6:534–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Managing Natura 2000 sites: the provisions of Article 6 of the ‘Habitats’ Directive 92/43/EEC. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Biodiversity strategy impact assessment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/2020/1_EN_impact_assesment_part1_v4.pdf

  • Gann GD, McDonald T, Aronson J, Dixon KW, Walder B, Hallett JG, Decleer K, Falk DA, Gonzales EK, Murcia C, Nelson CR, Unwin AJ (2018) The SER Standards: a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al. Restor Ecol 3:426–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habitats Directive (1992) Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora, OJ L 206, 22 July 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs E, Harris J, Murphy S, Bowers K, Hobbs R, Jenkins W, Kidwell J, Lopoukhine N, Sollereder B, Suding K, Thompson A, Whisenant S (2018) On principles and standards in ecological restoration. Restor Ecol 3:399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R, Higgs E, Harris J (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 11:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R, Higgs E, Hall C (eds) (2013) Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • ICJ (2018) International Court of Justice, certain activities carried out by Nicaragua in the border area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). Compensation owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica, judgment 2 Feb 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen D (2013) Ecological restoration in the Convention on Biological Diversity targets. Biodivers Conserv 22:2977–2982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenleyside K, Dudley N, Cairns S, Hall C, Stolton S (2012) Ecological restoration for protected areas: principles, guidelines and best practices. IUCN

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald T, Gann GD, Jonson J, Dixon KW (2016). International standards for the practice of ecological restoration—including principles and key concept. Society for Ecological Restoration

    Google Scholar 

  • Menz M, Dixon K, Hobbs R (2013) Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science 339:526–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C, Aronson J, Kattan GH, Moreno-Mateos D, Dixon K, Simberloff D (2014) A critique of the ‘novel ecosystem’ concept. Trends Ecol Evol 10:548–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oslo Manifesto (2016) From environmental law to ecological law: a call for re-framing law and governance. https://www.elga.world/oslo-manifesto/

  • Palmer M, Ruhl JB (2013) Aligning restoration science and the law to sustain ecological infrastructure for the future. Front Ecol Environ 9:512–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson B (2016) The emerging age of ecological restoration law. RECIEL 3:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin III FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/

  • Suding K, Higgs E, Palmer M, Baird Callicott J, Anderson CB, Baker M, Gutrich JJ, Hondula KL, LaFevor MC, Larson BMH, Randall A, Ruhl JB, Schwartz, KZS (2015) Committing to ecological restoration. Science 6235:638–640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2014) Global Biodiversity Outlook 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Murcia C, Aronson J (2015) “Novel ecosystems” are a Trojan horse for conservation. They provide a license to trash nature if they provide ecosystem services. Ensia. http://ensia.com/voices/novel-ecosystems-are-a-trojan-horse-for-conservation

  • Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 6223:1259855–1259855–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telesetsky A (2013) Ecoscapes: the future of place-based ecological restoration laws. Vt J Environ Law 4:493–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telesetsky A, Cliquet A, Akhtar-Khavari A (2017) Ecological restoration in international environmental law. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittensor DP et al (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 6206:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst A (2015) The Habitats Directive and climate change. Is the law climate proof? In: Born CH, Cliquet A, Schoukens H, Misonne D, Van Hoorick G (eds) The Habitats Directive in its EU environmental law context: European nature’s best hope? Routledge, pp 303–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Truitt AM, Granek EF, Duveneck MJ, Goldsmith KA, Jordan MP, Yazzie KC (2015) What is novel about novel ecosystems: managing change in an ever-changing world. Environ Manage 55:1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0465-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Andel J, Aronson J (eds) (2012). Restoration ecology: the new frontier, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldman JW, Overbeck GE, Negreiros D, Mahy G, Soizig Le Stradic G, Fernandes W, Durigan G, Buisson E, Putz FE, Bond WJ (2015) Tyranny of trees in grassy biomes. Science 347:484–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson James EM, Shanahan DF, Di Marco M, Allan J, Laurance WF, Sanderson EW, Mackey B, Venter O (2016) Catastrophic declines in wilderness areas undermine global environment targets. Curr Biol 21:2929–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2016). Half-earth. Our planet’s fight for life. Ww Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of European, Public and International Law, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    An Cliquet

Authors
  1. An Cliquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An Cliquet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Adelaide Law School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Michelle Lim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cliquet, A. (2019). Ecological Restoration as a Legal Duty in the Anthropocene. In: Lim, M. (eds) Charting Environmental Law Futures in the Anthropocene. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9065-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9065-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9064-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9065-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation