Skip to main content

IVIFCM-TOPSIS for Bank Credit Risk Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision Technologies 2019

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 142))

Abstract

Bank credit risk assessment is performed by credit rating agencies in order to reduce information asymmetry in financial markets. This costly process has been automated in earlier studies by using systems based on machine learning methods. However, such systems suffer from interpretability issues and do not utilize expert knowledge effectively. To overcome those problems, multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) methods have recently been used to simulate the assessment process performed by the committee of multiple credit risk experts. However, standard MCGDM methods fail to consider high uncertainty inherently associated with the assessment and do not work effectively when the assessed credit risk criteria interact with each other. To address these issues, we propose MCGDM model for bank credit risk assessment that has two advantages: (1) The imprecise assessment criteria are represented by interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, and (2) the interactions among the criteria are modeled using fuzzy cognitive maps. When combined with traditional TOPSIS approach to ranking alternatives, we show that the proposed model can be effectively applied to assess bank credit risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hammer, P.L., Kogan, A., Lejeune, M.A.: A logical analysis of banks financial strength ratings. Expert. Syst. Appl. 39(9), 7808–7821 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hajek, P., Michalak, K.: Feature selection in corporate credit rating prediction. Knowl.-Based Syst. 51, 72–84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hajek, P.: Predicting corporate investment/non-investment grade by using interval-valued fuzzy rule-based systems—a cross-region analysis. Appl. Soft Comput. 62, 73–85 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doumpos, M., Figueira, J.R.: A multicriteria outranking approach for modeling corporate credit ratings: an application of the Electre Tri-nC method. Omega 82, 166–180 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doumpos, M., Pasiouras, F.: Developing and testing models for replicating credit ratings: a multicriteria approach. Comput. Econ. 25(4), 327–341 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ulucan, A., Atici, K.B.: A multiple criteria sorting methodology with multiple classification criteria and an application to country risk evaluation. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 19(1), 93–124 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corazza, M., Funari, S., Gusso, R.: An evolutionary approach to preference disaggregation in a MURAME-based creditworthiness problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 29, 110–121 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wanke, P., Kalam Azad, M.A., Barros, C.P., Hadi Vencheh, A.: Predicting performance in ASEAN banks: an integrated fuzzy MCDMneural network approach. Expert. Syst. 33(3), 213–229 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai, C., Shi, B., Liu, F., Sarkis, J.: Banking credit worthiness: evaluating the complex relationships. Omega 83, 26–38 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Capotorti, A., Barbanera, E.: Credit scoring analysis using a fuzzy probabilistic rough set model. Comput. Stat. & Data Anal. 56(4), 981–994 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, T.C., Hsu, M.F.: Credit risk assessment and decision making by a fusion approach. Knowl.-Based Syst. 35, 102–110 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Angilella, S., Mazzu, S.: The financing of innovative SMEs: a multicriteria credit rating model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244(2), 540–554 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ic, Y.T., Yurdakul, M.: Development of a quick credibility scoring decision support system using fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37(1), 567–574 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wanke, P., Azad, M.A.K., Barros, C.P., Hassan, M.K.: Predicting efficiency in Islamic banks: an integrated multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach. J. Int. Financ. Mark., Inst. Money 45, 126–141 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gul, S., Kabak, O., Topcu, Y.I.: An OWA operator based cumulative belief degrees approach for credit rating. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(5), 998–1026 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia, F., Gimenez, V., Guijarro, F.: Credit risk management: a multicriteria approach to assess creditworthiness. Math. Comput. Model. 57(7–8), 2009–2015 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ic, Y.T.: Development of a credit limit allocation model for banks using an integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS and linear programming. Expert. Syst. Appl. 39(5), 5309–5316 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang, D., Darko, A.P., Xu, Z.: Pythagorean fuzzy partitioned geometric Bonferroni mean and its application to multi-criteria group decision making with grey relational analysis. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., pp. 1–14, (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hajek, P., Prochazka, O.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for supplier selection. In: Czarnowski I., Howlett R.J., Jain L.C. (eds.) Intelligent Decision Technologies 2017: Proceedings of the 9th KES International Conference on Intelligent Decision Technologies (KES-IDT 2017), pp. 207–217. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boran, F.E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D.: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert. Syst. Appl. 36, 11363–11368 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, Z.S.: Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control. Decis. 22, 215–219 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karaboga, D., Basturk, B.: On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 8, 687–697 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Papageorgiou, E., Parsopoulos, K., Stylios, C., Groumpos, P.P., Vrahatis, M.: Fuzzy cognitive maps learning using particle swarm optimization. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 25, 95–121 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Salvador, C., Pastor, J.M., de Guevara, J.F.: Impact of the subprime crisis on bank ratings: the effect of the hardening of rating policies and worsening of solvency. J. Financ. Stab. 11, 13–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hashemi, S.S., Hajiagha, S.H.R., Zavadskas, E.K., Mahdiraji, H.A.: Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 1554–1564 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was supported by the scientific research project of the Czech Sciences Foundation Grant No.: 16-19590S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Froelich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Froelich, W., Hajek, P. (2020). IVIFCM-TOPSIS for Bank Credit Risk Assessment. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies 2019. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 142. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8311-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics