Skip to main content

Reflections for Unionization in a Globalized World: Evidences of a Converging Divergence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalization, Labour Market Institutions, Processes and Policies in India
  • 350 Accesses

Abstract

Based on the evolutionary biology perspective, it is posited that trade unions too have evolved with respect to their forms and functions which has been inquired into in this chapter. Three specific organizing campaigns are presented, namely Hawker Sangram Committee (HSC), Civil Initiatives for Development (CIVIDEP) and Kagad Kach Patra Kashtakari Panchayat (KKPKP), as alternate forms of workers’ collectives in India. The convergence observed is that the primary objective of each of the organizations is to safeguard the interests of its constituent members, the divergence observed are in terms of the form (HSC and KKPKP are trade unions, while CIVIDEP is not a registered trade union) and the strategies adopted to achieve their objectives which have been elaborated. It is also to be noted that all the three organizations are symbolic of the relevance of the workers’ collective for the informal sector as well as the varied forms it is taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Trade union is defined in Section 2 (h) of Trade Union Act, 1926 as “Any combination whether temporary or permanent, formed primarily for regulating the relations between workmen and employers or between workmen and workmen or between employers and employers of for imposing restrictive conditions on the conduct of any trade or business and includes any federation of two or more trade unions.”

  2. 2.

    A protest in which the workers prevent employers from leaving the place of work till some demands are met.

References

  • Almada-Lobo, F. 2016. “Industry 4.0 Revolution and the Future of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)”. Journal of Innovation Management 3(4): 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anjaria, J.S. 2006. “Street Hawkers and Public Space in Mumbai”. Economic and Political Weekly 41(21): 2140–2146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, G.S., and R. Price. 1980. Profiles of Union Growth: A Comparative Statistical Portrait of Eight Countries. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, R. 2009. “Hawkers’ Movement in Kolkata, 1975–2007”. Economic and Political Weekly 44(17): 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, R. 2011. “Politics of Archiving: Hawkers and Pavement Dwellers in Calcutta”. Dialectical Anthropology 35(3): 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman, A., S.R. Rao, S.K. Chawla, P.U. Asnani, Saroj, R. Bhargava, and A. Patel. 1999. “Solid Waste Management in Class 1 Cities in India, 25”. Supreme Court of India. http://www.almitrapatel.com/docs/004.rtf. Accessed on 26 June 2018.

  • Bayat, A. 2000. “From Dangerous Classes’ to Quiet Rebels’ Politics of the Urban Subaltern in the Global South”. International Sociology 15(3): 533–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, A., and P. Chikarmane. 2012. “The Story of Waste and its Reclaimers: Organising Waste Collectors for Better Lives and Livelihoods”. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 55(4): 595–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikarmane, P. 2012. “Integrating Waste Pickers into Municipal Solid Waste Management in Pune, India”. Vol. 8, WIEGO Policy Brief (Urban Policies). http://www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Chikarmane_WIEGO_PB8.pdf. Accessed on 29 June 2018.

  • Chikarmane, P., M. Deshpande, and L. Narayan. 2001. Report on Scrap Collectors, Scrap Traders and Recycling Enterprises in Pune. Pune: ILO-SNDT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikarmane, P., and L. Narayan. 2000. “Formalizing Livelihood: The Case of Waste Pickers in Pune”. Economic and Political Weekly 35(41): 3639–3642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R. 1999. “Organizing the Unorganized: Case of Hamal Panchayat”. Economic and Political Weekly 34(39): L19–L26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunier, M., and O. Carter. 1999. Sidewalk. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Times. 2018. “We are Not Garbage Collectors, Supreme Court tells Centre”. The Economic Times, 06 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Political Weekly (EPW). 2012. “Not in my Backyard”. Economic and Political Weekly 47(29): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantasia, R., and K. Voss. 2004. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidwani, V., and R.N. Reddy. 2011. “The Afterlives of “Waste”: Notes from India for a Minor History of Capitalist Surplus”. Antipode 43(5): 1625–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. 2005. Suburban Sweatshops: The Fight for Immigrant Rights. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman. 1977. “The Population Ecology of Organizations”. American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 929–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawker Sangram Committee (HSC). 2007. An Initial Report of the Socio-economic Study of Hawkers or Street Vendors of Kolkata. Kolkata: Pratibandhi Udyog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, R. 1998. “Contesting the Dinosaur Image – Labour Movement’s Search for a Future”. Labor Studies Journal 22(4): 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idris, A., B. Inanc, and M.N. Hassan. 2004. “Overview of Waste Disposal and Landfills/Dumps in Asian Countries”. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 6(2): 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhabvala, R. 1999. “Interventions in the Labour Market: The Case of SEWA”. In Gender and Employment in India, T. S. Papola and Alakh N. Sharma (eds.). New Delhi: Vikas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H. 2015. “Change through Digitization – Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0.” In Management of Permanent Change, H. Albach, H. Meffert, A. Pinkwart and R. Reichwald (eds.). Gabler, Weisbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasi, H., P. Fettke, H.G. Kemper, T. Feld, and M. Hoffman. 2014. “Industry 4.0”. Business and Information Systems Engineering 6(4): 239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. 1995. Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities. London: Macmillan Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, N. 1992. “Women in Trade Unions: A Study of AITUC, INTUC and CITU in the Seventies”. In Struggles of Women at Work, S. Ghotoskar (ed.). New Delhi: Vikas.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO). 2014. “Informal Sector and Conditions of Employment in India. New Delhi”. http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/nss_rep_539.pdf. Accessed on 26 July 2018.

  • International Labour Organization. 2014. Rules of the Game: A Brief Introduction of International Labour Standards. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papola, T.S., J. Pais, and P.P. Sahu. 2008. Labour Regulation in Indian Industry: Towards a Rational and Equitable Framework. Bookwell Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollert, A. 2007. “Britain and Individual Employment Rights: ‘Paper tigers, Fierce in Appearance but Missing in Tooth and Vlaw’.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 28(1): 110–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, A. 2001. “The Violence of Commodity Aesthetics: Hawkers, Demolition Raids and a New Regime of Consumption”. Social Texts 19(3): 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roopa, M. 2003. “Garment Workers: Identifying Legal Issues and Strategies”. Paper presented at the Consultation on ‘Labour Standards in the Indian Garment Industry’, September 29–30, 2003. Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. 2013. “New Unions in the UK: The Vanguard or the Rearguard of the Union Movement?” Industrial Relations Journal 44(1): 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, S. 2003. “Public Sector Restructuring and Democracy: The State, Labour and Trade Unions in India”. Journal of Development Studies 39(3): 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, S. 2005. “Labour Activism and Women in the Unorganised Sector: Garment Export Industry in Bangalore”. Economic and Political Weekly 40(22–23): 2250–2255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, P. (ed.). 2003. “Solid Waste Management in Delhi–A Social Vulnerability Study.” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environment and Health, Chennai, India (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M.B., B.N. Kirpal, and D.P. Mohapatro. 2000. “Almitra H. Patel and Anr. vs Union of India and Ors”, 15 February. Delhi: Supreme Court of India. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/339109/. Accessed on 28 August 2018.

  • Standing, G. 1999. “Global Feminisation Through Flexible Labour: A Theme Revisited”. World Development 27(3): 583–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, G. 2012. “Whose Paradise? Itinerant Street Vendors’ Individual and Collective Practices of Political Agency in the Tourist Streets of Cusco, Peru”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(5): 1007–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, A. 2017. “Economic Survey”. India. http://mofapp.nic.in:8080/economicsurvey/. Accessed on 18 August 2018.

  • Sullivan, R. 2010. “Organizing Workers in the Space Between Unions: Union Centric Labour Revitalization and the Role of Community Based Organizations”. Critical Sociology 36(3): 793–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • SWaCH. 2018. “SWaCH History”. https://swachcoop.com/about/history/. Accessed on 1 May 2018.

  • Taylor, P., and H. Ramsey. 1998. “Unions, Partnership and HRM: Sleeping with the Enemy?” International Journal of Employment Studies 6(2): 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. 2006. “Union Membership Statistics in 24 countries”. Monthly Labour Review 129(1): 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO). 2015. “Myths & Facts About the Informal Economy and Workers in the Informal Economy”. http://www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/WIEGO-Myths-Facts-Informal-Economy.pdf. Accessed on 28 August 2018.

  • Zia, H., V. Devadas, and S. Shukla. 2008. “Assessing Informal Waste Recycling in Kanpur City, India”. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 19(5): 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girish Balasubramanian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 17.2 Summary of the significant divergences in terms of strategies and sectors for the three organizations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balasubramanian, G. (2019). Reflections for Unionization in a Globalized World: Evidences of a Converging Divergence. In: Shyam Sundar, K.R. (eds) Globalization, Labour Market Institutions, Processes and Policies in India. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7111-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7111-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7110-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7111-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics