Abstract
This chapter uses discourse analysis techniques associated with Foucauldian archaeology to ascertain the dominant discourses in the 2015 Australian Initial Teacher Education accreditation document. Findings reveal an overarching discourse of quality assurance anchored within the discursive themes of accreditation, evidence and impact. When these discursive themes are juxtaposed against the academic literature on professionalism, it becomes clear that teacher educators are being discursively repositioned in a managerial discourse. Recommendations are given for how teacher educators can navigate this highly regulated environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2012). National quality framework. Sydney: ACECQA.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Australian curriculum. Sydney: ACARA.
Australian Government. (2015). Australian Government response: Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group, Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/36789.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Melbourne: AITSL.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2015). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Melbourne: AITSL.
Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ball, S. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.
Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Beck, J. (2009). Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring the official knowledge base of England’s “modernised” teaching profession. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 3–14.
Bergeron, P. -J., Rivard, L. (Trans.). (2017). How to engage in pseudoscience with real data: A criticism of john hattie’s arguments in visible learning from the perspective of a statistician. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, [S.l.], v. 52, n. 1, july 2017. ISSN 1916-0666. Available at: Date accessed: 04 mar. 2019.
Biesta, G. J. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Biesta, G. J. (2010). Why “what works” still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
Biesta, G. J. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109.
Blunkett, D. (2000). Influence or irrelevance: Can social science improve government? Research Intelligence, 71, 12–21.
Bourke, T. (2011). Teacher professional standards: Mirage or Miracle Cure. An archaeology of professionalism in education. Ph.D. thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Lidstone, J. (2013). Reflexive professionalism: Reclaiming the voice of authority in shaping the discourses of education policy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 398–413.
Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Lloyd, M. M. (2016). The discursive positioning of graduating teachers in accreditation of teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 1–9.
Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Ould, P. (2018). How do teacher educators use professional standards in their practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 83–92.
Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S., Burke, J., & White, S. (Eds.). (2016a). Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact. Singapore: Springer.
Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S., Burke, J., & White, S. (2016b). Teacher education research and the policy reform agenda. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact (pp. 1–14). Singapore: Springer.
Brittingham, B. (2008). An uneasy partnership: Accreditation and the federal government. Change, 40, 32–38.
Caughlan, S., & Jiang, H. (2014). Observation and teacher quality: Critical analysis of observation instruments in preservice teacher performance assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 375–388.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). New York, NY: Springer.
Cochran-Smith, M., & The Boston College Evidence Team. (2009). “Re-Culturing” teacher education: Inquiry, evidence, and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 458–468.
Collins, I. (2015). Using international accreditation in higher education to effect changes in organisational culture: A case study from a Turkish university. Journal of Research in International Education, 14(2), 141–154.
Deem, R., Mok, K. H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21, 83–97.
Department of Education and Training. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (EYLF). Canberra: Australian Government.
Ellis, V., & McNicholl, J. (2015). Transforming teacher education: Reconfiguring the academic work. London: Bloomsbury.
Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.
Evans, L. (2011). The ‘shape’ of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851–870.
Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19–30). London: Routledge.
Ewell, J. (2008). US accreditation and the future of quality assurance. Washington, DC: The Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186–213.
Fertig, M. (2007). International school accreditation: Between a rock and a hard place? Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 333–348.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (Trans.: A. M. Sheridan Smith). London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Trans.: A. Sheridan). New York, NY: Random House.
Freeland, J. (1994). Teacher education in the late 1990s: Fighting for a place on the post pluralist policy agenda. Paper presented at the 24th Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference, July, Brisbane, Australia.
Furlong, J. (2005). New labour and teacher education: The end of an era. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 119–134.
Furlong, J. (2013). Education—An anatomy of the discipline. Rescuing the university project? London: Taylor and Francis.
Gale, T. (1999). Policy trajectories: Trending the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20, 393–407.
Goodson, I. (1999). Towards a principled professionalism for teaching. Keynote address presented at the New Professionalism in Teaching Conference, January, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Gore, J. (2015). Insights: Evidence of impact of teacher education programs: A focus on classroom observation. A paper prepared for the Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/ite-reform-stimulus-paper-2-gore.pdf.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
Gutierrez, A. (2016). Exploring the becoming of pre-service teachers in paired placement models. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact (pp. 139–155). Singapore: Springer.
Halstead, M. (1994). Accountability and values. In D. Scott (Ed.), Accountability and control in educational settings (pp. 3–14). London: Castell.
Hanlon, G. (1998). Professionalism as enterprise: Service class politics and the redefinition of professionalism. Sociology, 32(1), 43–63.
Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Interpretations, 36(2), 27–38.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hilferty, F. (2007). Contesting the curriculum: An examination of professionalism as defined and enacted by Australian history teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(3), 239–261.
Hilferty, F. (2008). Theorising teacher professionalism as an enacted discourse of power. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 161–173.
Hirst, P. H. (1996). The demands of professional practice and preparation for teaching. In J. Furlong & R. Smith (Eds.), The role of higher education in initial teacher training (pp. 166–178). London: Kogan Page.
Hoyle, E. (1974). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. London Educational Review, 3(2), 13–19.
Jervis-Tracey, P., & Finger, G. (2016). Internships in initial teacher education in Australia: A case study of the Griffith Internship. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact (pp. 157–174). Singapore: Springer.
Leaton Gray, S., & Whitty, G. (2010). Social trajectories or disrupted identities? Changing and competing models of teacher professionalism under New Labour. Cambridge journal of education, 40(1), 5–23.
Levin, B. (2003). Improving research-policy relationships: Lessons from the case of literacy. Paper presented at the OISE/UT International Literacy Conference: Literacy Policies for the Schools We Need, November 8, Toronto, Canada.
Louden, W. (2000). Standards for standards: The development of Australian professional standards for teaching. Australian Journal of Education, 44(2), 118–134.
Luke, A. (2003). After the market place: Evidence, social science and education research. Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 87–107.
Meiers, M., & Ingvarson, L. (2005). Investigating the links between teacher professional development and student learning outcomes. Barton, ACT: Australian Government, Quality Teacher Program.
Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for ‘what works’: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24–26.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the Great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Robertson, S. L. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and postFordism: Constructing the new ‘professionalism’. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 28–55). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Rowe, E., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2017). Calling for ‘urgent national action to improve the quality of initial teacher education’: The reification of evidence and accountability in reform agendas. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1410577.
Ryan, K. E., & Hood, L. K. (2004). Guarding the castle and opening the gates. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 79–95.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732.
Sanguinetti, J. (2000). An adventure in ‘postmodern’ action research: Performativity, professionalism and power. In J. Garrick & C. Rhodes (Eds.), Research and knowledge at work: Perspectives, case-studies and innovative strategies (pp. 232–249). London: Routledge.
Shah, M. (2012). Ten years of external quality audit in Australia: Evaluating its effectiveness and success. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 761–772.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2011). Decolonizing the evidence-based education and policy movement: Revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.508176.
Simons, H. (2003). Evidence-based practice: Panacea or over promise? Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 303–311.
Simpson, A. (2017). The misdirection of public policy: Comparing and combining standardised effect sizes. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1280183.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
Solbrekke, T. D., & Sugrue, C. (2014). Professional accreditation of initial teacher education programmes: Teacher educators’ strategies—Between ‘accountability’ and ‘professional responsibility’? Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 11–20.
Stensaker, B. (2011). Accreditation of higher education in Europe—Moving towards the US model? Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), 757–769.
Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19, 65–85.
Stosich, E. (2016). Joint inquiry: Teachers’ collective learning about the common core in high poverty urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1698–1731.
Supovitz, J. A., & Taylor, B. S. (2005). Systemic education evaluation: Evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(2), 204–230.
Trends, V. (2007). Universities shaping the European higher education area. Brussels: European University Association.
White, S. (2016). Teacher education research and education policy-makers: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(2), 252–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bourke, T. (2019). The Changing Face of Accreditation for Initial Teacher Education Programmes in Australia. In: Gutierrez, A., Fox, J., Alexander, C. (eds) Professionalism and Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7002-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7002-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7001-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7002-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)