Skip to main content

The Changing Face of Accreditation for Initial Teacher Education Programmes in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professionalism and Teacher Education

Abstract

This chapter uses discourse analysis techniques associated with Foucauldian archaeology to ascertain the dominant discourses in the 2015 Australian Initial Teacher Education accreditation document. Findings reveal an overarching discourse of quality assurance anchored within the discursive themes of accreditation, evidence and impact. When these discursive themes are juxtaposed against the academic literature on professionalism, it becomes clear that teacher educators are being discursively repositioned in a managerial discourse. Recommendations are given for how teacher educators can navigate this highly regulated environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2012). National quality framework. Sydney: ACECQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Australian curriculum. Sydney: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2015). Australian Government response: Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group, Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education and Training. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/36789.

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Melbourne: AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2015). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Melbourne: AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2009). Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring the official knowledge base of England’s “modernised” teaching profession. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, P. -J., Rivard, L. (Trans.). (2017). How to engage in pseudoscience with real data: A criticism of john hattie’s arguments in visible learning from the perspective of a statistician. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, [S.l.], v. 52, n. 1, july 2017. ISSN 1916-0666. Available at: Date accessed: 04 mar. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. (2010). Why “what works” still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunkett, D. (2000). Influence or irrelevance: Can social science improve government? Research Intelligence, 71, 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, T. (2011). Teacher professional standards: Mirage or Miracle Cure. An archaeology of professionalism in education. Ph.D. thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Lidstone, J. (2013). Reflexive professionalism: Reclaiming the voice of authority in shaping the discourses of education policy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 398–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Lloyd, M. M. (2016). The discursive positioning of graduating teachers in accreditation of teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Ould, P. (2018). How do teacher educators use professional standards in their practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S., Burke, J., & White, S. (Eds.). (2016a). Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S., Burke, J., & White, S. (2016b). Teacher education research and the policy reform agenda. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact (pp. 1–14). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittingham, B. (2008). An uneasy partnership: Accreditation and the federal government. Change, 40, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughlan, S., & Jiang, H. (2014). Observation and teacher quality: Critical analysis of observation instruments in preservice teacher performance assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & The Boston College Evidence Team. (2009). “Re-Culturing” teacher education: Inquiry, evidence, and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 458–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, I. (2015). Using international accreditation in higher education to effect changes in organisational culture: A case study from a Turkish university. Journal of Research in International Education, 14(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Mok, K. H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (EYLF). Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, V., & McNicholl, J. (2015). Transforming teacher education: Reconfiguring the academic work. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (2011). The ‘shape’ of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, J. (2008). US accreditation and the future of quality assurance. Washington, DC: The Council for Higher Education Accreditation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertig, M. (2007). International school accreditation: Between a rock and a hard place? Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (Trans.: A. M. Sheridan Smith). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Trans.: A. Sheridan). New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, J. (1994). Teacher education in the late 1990s: Fighting for a place on the post pluralist policy agenda. Paper presented at the 24th Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference, July, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2005). New labour and teacher education: The end of an era. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2013). Education—An anatomy of the discipline. Rescuing the university project? London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T. (1999). Policy trajectories: Trending the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20, 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (1999). Towards a principled professionalism for teaching. Keynote address presented at the New Professionalism in Teaching Conference, January, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. (2015). Insights: Evidence of impact of teacher education programs: A focus on classroom observation. A paper prepared for the Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/ite-reform-stimulus-paper-2-gore.pdf.

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, A. (2016). Exploring the becoming of pre-service teachers in paired placement models. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact (pp. 139–155). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, M. (1994). Accountability and values. In D. Scott (Ed.), Accountability and control in educational settings (pp. 3–14). London: Castell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, G. (1998). Professionalism as enterprise: Service class politics and the redefinition of professionalism. Sociology, 32(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Interpretations, 36(2), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilferty, F. (2007). Contesting the curriculum: An examination of professionalism as defined and enacted by Australian history teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(3), 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilferty, F. (2008). Theorising teacher professionalism as an enacted discourse of power. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. H. (1996). The demands of professional practice and preparation for teaching. In J. Furlong & R. Smith (Eds.), The role of higher education in initial teacher training (pp. 166–178). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (1974). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. London Educational Review, 3(2), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis-Tracey, P., & Finger, G. (2016). Internships in initial teacher education in Australia: A case study of the Griffith Internship. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact (pp. 157–174). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaton Gray, S., & Whitty, G. (2010). Social trajectories or disrupted identities? Changing and competing models of teacher professionalism under New Labour. Cambridge journal of education, 40(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2003). Improving research-policy relationships: Lessons from the case of literacy. Paper presented at the OISE/UT International Literacy Conference: Literacy Policies for the Schools We Need, November 8, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W. (2000). Standards for standards: The development of Australian professional standards for teaching. Australian Journal of Education, 44(2), 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). After the market place: Evidence, social science and education research. Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiers, M., & Ingvarson, L. (2005). Investigating the links between teacher professional development and student learning outcomes. Barton, ACT: Australian Government, Quality Teacher Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for ‘what works’: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the Great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. L. (1996). Teachers’ work, restructuring and postFordism: Constructing the new ‘professionalism’. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 28–55). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2017). Calling for ‘urgent national action to improve the quality of initial teacher education’: The reification of evidence and accountability in reform agendas. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1410577.

  • Ryan, K. E., & Hood, L. K. (2004). Guarding the castle and opening the gates. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanguinetti, J. (2000). An adventure in ‘postmodern’ action research: Performativity, professionalism and power. In J. Garrick & C. Rhodes (Eds.), Research and knowledge at work: Perspectives, case-studies and innovative strategies (pp. 232–249). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M. (2012). Ten years of external quality audit in Australia: Evaluating its effectiveness and success. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 761–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahjahan, R. A. (2011). Decolonizing the evidence-based education and policy movement: Revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.508176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H. (2003). Evidence-based practice: Panacea or over promise? Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. (2017). The misdirection of public policy: Comparing and combining standardised effect sizes. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1280183.

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solbrekke, T. D., & Sugrue, C. (2014). Professional accreditation of initial teacher education programmes: Teacher educators’ strategies—Between ‘accountability’ and ‘professional responsibility’? Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2011). Accreditation of higher education in Europe—Moving towards the US model? Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stosich, E. (2016). Joint inquiry: Teachers’ collective learning about the common core in high poverty urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1698–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J. A., & Taylor, B. S. (2005). Systemic education evaluation: Evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(2), 204–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trends, V. (2007). Universities shaping the European higher education area. Brussels: European University Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2016). Teacher education research and education policy-makers: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(2), 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa Bourke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bourke, T. (2019). The Changing Face of Accreditation for Initial Teacher Education Programmes in Australia. In: Gutierrez, A., Fox, J., Alexander, C. (eds) Professionalism and Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7002-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7002-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7001-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7002-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics