Skip to main content

Durability Studies on Alkali Activated Fly Ash and GGBS-Based Geopolymer Mortars

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Construction and Building Materials

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 25))

Abstract

The present scenario in the growth of infrastructure development led to the production of high amount of concrete. Cement being the major binding material to make concrete imperatively causes the release of high amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) into atmosphere. The thought about sustainable environment arose a strong concern towards development of geopolymer concrete (GPC) that can be produced with alternative cementitious materials (Fly ash, GGBS, micro-silica, etc.). The research work presented in this paper explained the development of mortar specimens with fly ash and GGBS as binders. Nowadays, the construction industry requires the replacement of cement mortar with the novel type material, i.e. geopolymer mortar. It can be produced by using fly ash and GGBS as binders; and alkaline solution (combination of NaOH and Na2SiO3) as activator. Generally, heat treatment is necessary for curing geopolymer materials which becomes a drawback in practical applications. This study includes the development of geopolymer mortars under outdoor curing and suggests the attainment of strength with proper proportions of GGBS and Fly ash. Research work was carried out on fly ash and GGBS-based geopolymer mortar subjected to acidic solutions (Sulphuric and Nitric). The main parameters considered in this study were mass loss and strength loss. An experimental study was conducted to analyse the acid attack resistance of geopolymer mortar, considering five different mixes with varying the fly ash and GGBS (100FA-0GGBS, 75FA-25GGBS, 50FA-50GGBS, 25FA-75GGBS and 0FA-100GGBS) for different acid exposure periods of 7 and 28 days. The performance of geopolymer mortar of 100FA-0GGBS when exposed to acid environment was found to be superior compared with the other mixes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davidovits, J. (1978). Synthetic mineral polymer compound of the silicoaluminate family and preparation process. US patent 4472199.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, S. D., Pu, X. C., Scrivener, K. L., & Pratt, P. L. (1995). Alkali-activated slag cement and concrete: A review of properties and problems. Advanced Cement Research, 27, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakharev, T. (2005). Durability of geopolymeric materials in sodium and Magnesium sulfate solutions. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(2005), 1233–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olivia, M., & Nora, H. R. (2011). Strength and water permeability of fly ash geopolymer concrete. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blaakmeer, J. (1994). Diabind: An alkali-activated slag fly ash binder for acid resistant concrete. Advanced Cement Based Materials, 1, 275–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Changgao, L. U., & Ruihua, L. I. (1997). Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement (Vol. 8), Gothenburg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xincheng, P., Changhui, Y., & Fan, L. (1999). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference (pp. 717–722), Kiev, Ukraine.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rostami, H., & Silverstrim, T. (1996). Proceedings of the 13th Annual Pittsburgh Coal Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1074–1079).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skvara, F., & Bohunek, J. (1999). Chemical activation of substances with latent hydraulic properties. Ceramics-Silikaty, 43(3), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  10. BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). (1956). IS 516-1956 (Reaffirmed 1999): Indian Standard Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thokchom, S., Dutta, D., & Ghosh, S. (2011). Effect of incorporating silica fume in fly ash geopolymers. International Journal of Civil, Environmental and Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 5(12).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sata, V., Sathonsaowaphak, A., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2012). Resistance of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar to sulfate and sulfuric acid attack. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34, 700–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Mallikarjuna Rao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mallikarjuna Rao, G., Kireety, C.H. (2019). Durability Studies on Alkali Activated Fly Ash and GGBS-Based Geopolymer Mortars. In: Das, B., Neithalath, N. (eds) Sustainable Construction and Building Materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3317-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3317-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3316-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3317-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics