Skip to main content

Selection of Software Development Model Using TOPSIS Methodology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data and Communication Networks

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 847))

Abstract

In software industry, the software project failure is a serious concern for stakeholders. The company suffers a huge financial loss in a year due to the team’s negligence and irresponsibility. It can happen because of mismanagement in decision making at any stage of project development. But the study conducted so far cites several causes such as unarticulated project goals, mishandling of requirements, poor estimation of resources, sloppy software development life-cycle model. The paper tries to reduce the effort of decision-makers and project team by outlining the significance of TOPSIS model. The statistical and quantitative analysis is the main feature of TOPSIS. It accomplishes the experts’ job by validating their opinions. It prioritizes the defined options after evaluating them against confliction and multiple attributes. The research proposes a decision-making framework for the selection of software development model using one of the widely accepted multicriteria decision-making tools, i.e., TOPSIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology: Computer Society of IEEE, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verner, J., Sampson, J., Cerpa, N.: What factors lead to software project failure? In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, Morocco, pp. 85–93 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hernández-Ledesma, G., Ramos, E.G., Fernández-y-Fernández, C.A., Aguilar-Cisneros, J.R., Rosas-Sumano, J.J., Morales-Ignacio, L.A.: Selection of best software engineering practices: a multi-criteria decision making approach. Res. Comput. Sci. 47–60 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10, 56–66 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., Venkatesan, V.P.: A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am. J. Inform. Syst. 1, 31–43 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Triantaphyllou, E., Shu, B., Sanchez, S.N., Ray, T.: Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. Encycl. Electr. Electron. Eng. 15, 175–186 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ermatita, Hartati, S., Wardoyo, R., Harjoko, A.: Electre methods in solving group decision support system bioinformatics on gene mutation detection simulation. IJCSIT 3, 40–52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anitha, M., Sathiya, M.: Improved technique by integrating AHP-TOPSIS for prioritization. IJETST 2, 1911–1915 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 9–26 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang, D.-Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95, 649–655 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayhan, M.B.: A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: a case study in a gear motor company. IJMVSC 4, 11–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jollyta, D.: TOPSIS technique for selecting of property development location. Softw. Eng. 6, 20–26 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sehra, S.K., Brar, Y.S., Kaur, N.: Applying fuzzy-AHP for software effort estimation in data scarcity. IJETT 45, 4–9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., Agouti, T.: Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. In: SpringerPlus, pp. 1–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dipti, S.: Maintainability estimation of component based software development using fuzzy AHP. IJETST 1, 280–285 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ersayin, K., Tagil, S.: Ecological sensitivity and risk assessment in the Kizilirmak Delta. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 26, 6508–6516 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sakshi Aggarwal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gaur, D., Aggarwal, S. (2019). Selection of Software Development Model Using TOPSIS Methodology. In: Jain, L., E. Balas, V., Johri, P. (eds) Data and Communication Networks. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 847. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2254-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2254-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2253-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2254-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics