Abstract
In software industry, the software project failure is a serious concern for stakeholders. The company suffers a huge financial loss in a year due to the team’s negligence and irresponsibility. It can happen because of mismanagement in decision making at any stage of project development. But the study conducted so far cites several causes such as unarticulated project goals, mishandling of requirements, poor estimation of resources, sloppy software development life-cycle model. The paper tries to reduce the effort of decision-makers and project team by outlining the significance of TOPSIS model. The statistical and quantitative analysis is the main feature of TOPSIS. It accomplishes the experts’ job by validating their opinions. It prioritizes the defined options after evaluating them against confliction and multiple attributes. The research proposes a decision-making framework for the selection of software development model using one of the widely accepted multicriteria decision-making tools, i.e., TOPSIS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2010)
IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology: Computer Society of IEEE, New York (1990)
Verner, J., Sampson, J., Cerpa, N.: What factors lead to software project failure? In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, Morocco, pp. 85–93 (2008)
Hernández-Ledesma, G., Ramos, E.G., Fernández-y-Fernández, C.A., Aguilar-Cisneros, J.R., Rosas-Sumano, J.J., Morales-Ignacio, L.A.: Selection of best software engineering practices: a multi-criteria decision making approach. Res. Comput. Sci. 47–60 (2017)
Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10, 56–66 (2013)
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., Venkatesan, V.P.: A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am. J. Inform. Syst. 1, 31–43 (2013)
Triantaphyllou, E., Shu, B., Sanchez, S.N., Ray, T.: Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. Encycl. Electr. Electron. Eng. 15, 175–186 (1998)
Ermatita, Hartati, S., Wardoyo, R., Harjoko, A.: Electre methods in solving group decision support system bioinformatics on gene mutation detection simulation. IJCSIT 3, 40–52 (2011)
Anitha, M., Sathiya, M.: Improved technique by integrating AHP-TOPSIS for prioritization. IJETST 2, 1911–1915 (2015)
Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 9–26 (1990)
Chang, D.-Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95, 649–655 (1996)
Ayhan, M.B.: A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: a case study in a gear motor company. IJMVSC 4, 11–23 (2013)
Jollyta, D.: TOPSIS technique for selecting of property development location. Softw. Eng. 6, 20–26 (2018)
Sehra, S.K., Brar, Y.S., Kaur, N.: Applying fuzzy-AHP for software effort estimation in data scarcity. IJETT 45, 4–9 (2017)
Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., Agouti, T.: Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. In: SpringerPlus, pp. 1–17 (2016)
Dipti, S.: Maintainability estimation of component based software development using fuzzy AHP. IJETST 1, 280–285 (2014)
Ersayin, K., Tagil, S.: Ecological sensitivity and risk assessment in the Kizilirmak Delta. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 26, 6508–6516 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gaur, D., Aggarwal, S. (2019). Selection of Software Development Model Using TOPSIS Methodology. In: Jain, L., E. Balas, V., Johri, P. (eds) Data and Communication Networks. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 847. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2254-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2254-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2253-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2254-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)