Skip to main content

Community Memory Mapping as a Visual Ethnography of Post-War Northeast England

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Memory Research
  • 585 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter develops around a community mapping methodology and its fieldwork. Community-centred visualisations, growing out of emplaced stories and affects, may be able to channel otherwise elusive imaginaries and the ephemeral mnemonic spaces encountered in fieldwork. For Ricoeur, telling stories can give shape to ephemeral, intangible elements of everyday life. What of the intangible elements of everyday life and storytelling that are remembered collectively and individually, but do not necessarily leave a physical trace? This chapter engages with one such visualisation, a memory-map of the village of Kibblesworth in northeast England, populated with the present and past imaginings of a community of people and of an open-air museum. The museum embodies the imagination of place and of local/non-local memory construction, as it prepares to ‘reassemble’ and exhibit a terrace of prefabricated concrete houses removed from Kibblesworth in the new 1950s town.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this project, I take co-researchers to mean a pool of 80 current and past residents of the villages of Kibblesworth and Old Ravensworth in greater Gateshead who donated their time, memories, and expertise to the design and production of Remaking Beamish and who were the primary authors of the community memory mapping side of the project.

  2. 2.

    Here, by academic researchers and curators, I refer to heritage professionals whose professional duties entail paid activities and projects, which community co-researchers usually engage in on an unpaid and voluntary basis.

References

  • Agnew, J. (1987). Place and politics. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: An archaeological geography of knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, G., Kearns, R., Kontos, P., & Wilson, V. (2006). Their finest hour: Older people, oral histories, and the historical geography of social life. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D. (2007). Kitsch geographies and the everyday spaces of social memory. Environment and Planning A, 39, 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelletto, F. (2003). Long-term memory of extreme events: From autobiography to history. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. (2001). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 177–190). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Nardi, S. (2014). Senses of place, senses of the past: Making experiential maps as part of community heritage fieldwork. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 1(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nardi, S. (2016). The poetics of conflict experience: Materiality and embodiment in second world war Italy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Nardi, S. (2019). Visualising place, memory and the imagined. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLyser, D. (1999). Authenticity on the ground: Engaging the past in a California ghost town. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(4), 602–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, B. (2010). Heritage, place and community. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdzewski, D. (2015). Retrospective reflexivity: The residual and subliminal repercussions of researching war. Emotion, Space and Society, 17, 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, P. (2014). Grassroots archaeology: An experiment in monument resurrection and suburban identity in North Dublin. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 1(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, G. (2000). Dream spaces. Memory and the museum. London: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, M. (1992). Angry writing: (Re)presenting the unethical world of the ethnographer. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10, 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesby, M. (2007). Spatialising participatory approaches: The contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2813–2831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. (1997). A people’s story: Heritage, identity and authority. In C. Rojek & J. Urry (Eds.), Touring cultures: Transformations of travel and theory (pp. 155–175). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKian, S. (2004). Mapping reflexive communities: Visualising the geographies of emotion. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(4), 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (2002). The ethics of memory. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and “memory returns”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, S. (1992). Museums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Leicester: Leicester University-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2013). Engaging the senses in ethnographic practice: Implications and advances. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rednile Projects. http://www.rednile.org/public-realm/insider-art-kibblesworth/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.

  • Ricoeur, P. (1991). In M. J. Valdés (Ed.), A Ricoeur reader. Reflection and imagination. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M., & Harvey, D. (2005). Landscape archaeology, heritage and the community in Devon: An oral history approach. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(4), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, U. Z. (2006). Accounting for multiple desires: Decolonizing methodologies, archaeology, and the public interest. India Review, 5(3), 394–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouverol, A. J. (1999). “I was content and not content”: Oral history and the collaborative process. Oral History, 28(2), 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sather-Wagstaff, J. (2017). Making polysense of the world: Affect, memory, heritage. In D. Tolia-Kelly, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, practices and infrastructures (pp. 12–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama, S. (2005). Landscape and memory. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, C. H. (2003). Interviewing in ‘place’: The socio-spatial construction of interview data. Area, 35, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia. A study of environmental perception. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, M. (2012, May 7). Gateshead prefabs become part of history, online at https://www.theguardian.com/uk/the-northerner/2012/may/07/housing-heritage-prefabs-airey-gateshead In The Guardian. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.

  • Waterton, E. (2005). Whose sense of place? Reconciling archaeological perspectives with community values: Cultural landscapes in England. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(4), 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E. (2014). A more-than-representational understanding of heritage: The ‘past’ and the politics of affect. Geography Compass, 8(11), 823–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S., & Waterton, E. (2010). Reading the visual: Representation and narrative in the construction of heritage. Material Culture Review, 71, 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcomb, A. (2013). Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: the Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, J. (2002). An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum, 33, 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (2003). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Nardi, S. (2019). Community Memory Mapping as a Visual Ethnography of Post-War Northeast England. In: Drozdzewski, D., Birdsall, C. (eds) Doing Memory Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1410-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1411-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics