Skip to main content

Advancing Memory Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Memory Research

Abstract

This introductory chapter provides an extended reflection on the scope of memory methods, charting the existing methods-based research, and how an affective turn in the humanities and social sciences has prompted scholars in memory studies to engage with more-than-human and embodied methodological approaches. The introduction also outlines the themes covered by the volume: an ethics of care, experiencing and emplaced (researcher) bodies, and places—mapped and digital. We summarise the contributions, explicating how they push traditional methodological boundaries in their engagement with multisensorial and embodied memory-work, and use memory places through mapping and digital media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, C. J., & Drozdzewski, D. (2018). Capturing commemoration: Using mobile recordings within memory research. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 266–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkens, M., Minca, C., & Muzaini, H. (2015). Storytelling as method in spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2310–2326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. (2000). Remembering. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, M. M., & Rose, G. (2012). The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory. Urban Studies, 49, 3271–3287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohoe, J. (2014). Remembering places: A phenomenological study of the relationship between memory and place. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdzewski, D. (2016). Encountering memory in the everyday city. In D. Drozdzewski, S. D. Nardi, & E. Waterton (Eds.), Memory, place and identity: Commemoration and remembrance of war and conflict (pp. 19–37). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdzewski, D., De Nardi, S., & Waterton, E. (2016). The significance of memory in the present. In D. Drozdzewski, S. De Nardi, & E. Waterton (Eds.), Memory, place and identity: Commemoration and remembrance of war and conflict (pp. 1–16). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2017). Manifesting compassionate autoethnographic research: Focusing on others. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, T., & Misgav, C. (2014). Memory and place in participatory planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(3), 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, J., & Kalin, J. (2016). Here, I used to be: Mobile media and practices of place-based digital memory. Space and Culture, 19(1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory (with an original introduction by M Douglas). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelscher, S., & Alderman, D. (2004). Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(3), 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A. (2011a). Media, memory, metaphor: Remembering and the connective turn. Parallax, 17(4), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A. (2011b). 7/7 and connective memory: Interactional trajectories of remembering in post-scarcity culture. Memory Studies, 4(3), 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A. (2018). The restless past: An introduction to digital memory and media. In A. Hoskins (Ed.), Digital memory studies: Media pasts in transition (pp. 1–23). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2011). Geography, memory and non-representational geographies. Geography Compass, 5(12), 875–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattago, S. (2016). The Ashgate research companion to memory studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2013). Research methods for memory studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder Mackley, K., & Pink, S. (2017). From emplaced knowledge to interdisciplinary knowledge. In S. Pink, V. Fors, & T. O’Dell (Eds.), Theoretical scholarship and applied practice (pp. 121–141). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Ingold, T. (2006). Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. In P. Collins & S. Coleman (Eds.), Locating the field. Space, place and context in anthropology (pp. 67–86). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, S. (2004). Memory and nostalgia. Cultural Geographies, 11, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, S. (2005). Sites of counter-memory: The refusal to forget and the nationalist struggle in colonial Delhi. Historical Geography, 33, 180–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerfeld Bell, M. (2004). An invitation to environmental sociology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, C., & Goodman, M. K. (2010). Place geography and the ethics of care: Introductory remarks on the geographies of ethics, responsibility and care. Ethics, Place & Environment, 13(2), 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and ‘memory returns’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(1), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzaini, H. (2016). Personal reflections on formal second world war memories/memorials in everyday spaces. In D. Drozdzewski, S. De Nardi, & E. Waterton (Eds.), Memory, place and identity: Commemoration and remembrance of war and conflict (pp. 38–55). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de memoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K., Sierp, A., & Wüstenberg, J. (2017). The memory studies association: Ambitions and an invitation. Memory Studies, 10(4), 490–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M., & Hubbard, P. (2010). Walking, sensing, belonging: Ethno-mimesis as performative praxis. Visual Studies, 25(1), 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkul, D., & Humphreys, L. (2015). Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger III, H. L., & Wertsch, J. V. (2008). Creating a new discipline of memory studies. Memory Studies, 1(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (2000). Invention, memory and place. Critical Inquiry, 26, 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sather-Wagstaff, J. (2017). Making polysense of the world: Affect, memory, heritage. In D. P. Tolia-Kelly, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, practices and infrastructures, Abingdon (pp. 12–29). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, N., & Pratt, G. (2002). Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9(3), 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, A. E., Hayes-Conroy, A., Sweet, E. L., Miele, M., & Ash, J. (2017). Better than text? Critical reflections on the practices of visceral methodologies in human geography. Geoforum, 82, 200–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (2014). We came here to remember: Using participatory sensory ethnography to explore memory as emplaced, embodied practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(4), 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S. (2016). Commemorative atmospheres: Memorial sites, collective events and the experience of national identity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S. (2017). Tweeting from the past: Commemorating the Anzac centenary @ABCNews1915. Memory Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017709873.

  • Till, K. E. (1999). Staging the past: Landscape designs, cultural identity and Erinnerungspolitik at Berlin’s Neue Wache. Ecumene, 6(3), 251–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, K. E. (2012). Wounded cities: Memory-work and a place-based ethics of care. Political Geography, 31(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, K. E., & Kuusisto-Arponen, A. K. (2015). Towards responsible geographies of memory: Complexities of place and the ethics of remembering. Erdkunde, 69(4), 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, S. (2014). Mobile public memory: The (digital/physical) (artifacts/souvenirs) of the (archiver/tourist). SAGE Open, 4(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolia-Kelly, D. P., Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2017). Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, Practices and infrastructures. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, J. (2007). Mediated memories in the digital age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn, N. (2013). Assembling the affective field: How smartphone technology impacts ethnographic research practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergunst, J. L., & Ingold, T. (2008). Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Dittmer, J. (2014). The museum as assemblage: Bringing forth affect at the Australian war Memorial. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(2), 122–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2013). Framing theory: Towards a critical imagination in heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(6), 546–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2015). A war long forgotten: Feeling the past in an English country village. Angelaki, 20(3), 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcomb, A. (2016). Beyond sentimentality and glorification: Using a history of emotions to deal with the horrors of war. In D. Drozdzewski, S. De Nardi, & E. Waterton (Eds.), Memory, place and identity: Commemoration and remembrance of war and conflict (pp. 205–220). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle Drozdzewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Drozdzewski, D., Birdsall, C. (2019). Advancing Memory Methods. In: Drozdzewski, D., Birdsall, C. (eds) Doing Memory Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1410-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1411-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics