Skip to main content

Recurrent Varicose Veins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Venous Disorders
  • 676 Accesses

Abstract

Visible varicose veins affect approximately 10–15% of the adult population, with a similar percentage of people suffering from superficial venous incompetence (also known as chronic venous incompetence or superficial venous reflux) which is essentially the same disease but without visible varicosities [1–3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ruckley CV, Evans CJ, Allan PL, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG. Chronic venous insufficiency: clinical and duplex correlations. The Edinburgh Vein Study of venous disorders in the general population. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(3):520–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans CJ, Fowkes FGR, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:149–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Maurins U, Hoffmann BH, Losch C. Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population—results from the Bonn Vein Study, Germany. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:680–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pannier F, Rabe E. Progression in venous pathology. Phlebology. 2015;30(1 Suppl):95–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514568847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franceschi C. Ambulatory and hemodynamic treatment of venous insufficiency (CHIVA cure). J Mal Vasc. 1992;17(4):291–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fassiadis N, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. The Saphenofemoral valve: gate keeper turned into rear guard. Phlebology. 2002;17:29–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abu-Own A, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Saphenous vein reflux without incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg. 1994;81(10):1452–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schul MW, Schloerke B, Gomes GM. The refluxing anterior accessory saphenous vein demonstrates similar clinical severity when compared to the refluxing great saphenous vein. Phlebology. 2016;31(9):654–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355515604532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutherford EE, Kianifard B, Cook SJ, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. Incompetent perforating veins are associated with recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21(5):458–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whiteley MS. Part One: for the motion. venous perforator surgery is proven and does reduce recurrences. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(3):239–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.06.044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hobbs JT. Varicose veins arising from the pelvis due to ovarian vein incompetence. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59(10):1195–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giannoukas AD, Dacie JE, Lumley JS. Recurrent varicose veins of both lower limbs due to bilateral ovarian vein incompetence. Ann Vasc Surg. 2000;14(4):397–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whiteley AM, Taylor DC, Dos Santos SJ, Whiteley MS. Pelvic venous reflux is a major contributory cause of recurrent varicose veins in more than a quarter of women. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2(4):411–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whiteley MS, Dos Santos SJ, Harrison CC, Holdstock JM, Lopez AJ. Transvaginal duplex ultrasonography appears to be the gold standard investigation for the haemodynamic evaluation of pelvic venous reflux in the ovarian and internal iliac veins in women. Phlebology. 2015;30(10):706–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514554638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dos Santos SJ, Holdstock JM, Harrison CC, Lopez AJ, Whiteley MS. Ovarian vein diameter cannot be used as an indicator of ovarian venous reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(1):90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Asano M, Yoshida K, Tatai K. Observation of the behavior of microcirculation by rabbit ear chamber technique. I. Bull Inst Publ Health. 1963;12:34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kon K, Fujiwara T. Transformation of fibroblasts into endothelial cells during angiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;278(3):625–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999;85(3):221–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw JJ. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(4):442–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Munasinghe A, Smith C, Kianifard B, Price BA, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. Strip-track revascularization after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Br J Surg. 2007;94(7):840–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kianifard B, Holdstock J, Allen C, Smith C, Price B, Whiteley MS. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of adding subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery to standard great saphenous vein stripping. Br J Surg. 2007;94(9):1075–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ostler AE, Holdstock JM, Harrison CC, Price BA, Whiteley MS. Strip-tract revascularization as a source of recurrent venous reflux following high saphenous tie and stripping: results at 5-8 years after surgery. Phlebology. 2015;30(8):569–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514535927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Perälä J, Ohtonen P, Heikkinen T, Wiik H, Karjalainen P, Haukipuro K, Juvonen T. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):958–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fassiadis N, Kianifard B, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. A novel endoluminal technique for varicose vein management: the VNUS closure. Phlebology. 2002;16:145–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fassiadis N, Kianifard B, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. Ultrasound changes at the saphenofemoral junction and in the long saphenous vein during the first year after VNUS closure. Int Angiol. 2002;21(3):272–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kianifard B, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. Radiofrequency ablation (VNUS Closure®) does not cause neo-vascularisation at the groin at one year: results of a case controlled study. Surgeon. 2006;4(2):71–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Whiteley MS, Holdstock J. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablations of varicose veins (VNUS closure). In: Greenhalgh RM, editor. Vascular and endovascular challenges. London: Biba Publishing; 2004. p. 361–81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Whiteley M. Varicose veins: endovascular options. In: Greenhalgh RM, editor. Towards vascular and endovascular consensus. London: Biba Publishing; 2005. p. 564–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whiteley M. New methods of vein ablation. In: Davies AH, Lees T, Lane IF, editors. Venous disease simplified. London: Harley; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Proebstle TM, Krummenauer F, Gül D, Knop J. Nonocclusion and early reopening of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment is fluence dependent. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(2 Pt 1):174–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Proebstle TM, Moehler T, Gül D, Herdemann S. Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(12):1678–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cowpland CA, Cleese AL, Whiteley MS. Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins - a review of the clinical evidence. Phlebology. 2017;32(5):299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355516648067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Badham GE, Strong SM, Whiteley MS. An in vitro study to optimise treatment of varicose veins with radiofrequency-induced thermo therapy. Phlebology. 2015;30(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514552005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Badham GE, Dos Santos SJ, Whiteley MS. Radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy (RFiTT) in a porcine liver model and ex vivo great saphenous vein. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017;26:200–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2017.1282520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ashpitel H, Salguero F, La Ragione R, Whiteley M. Radial-firing endovenous laser penetrates deeper into the vein wall than forward-firing jacket-tipped fibers and reduces carbonization — an ex vivo study using histology and immunohistochemistry. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(1):147–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.10.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Whiteley MS. Endovenous thermal ablation of varicose veins and examination of the use and failings of linear endovenous energy density (LEED). In: Whiteley M, Dabbs E, editors. Advances in phlebology and venous surgery, vol. 1. Milton Keynes: Whiteley Publishing; 2017. p. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Braithwaite B, Hnatek L, Zierau U, Camci M, Akkersdijk G, Nio D, Sarlija M, Ajduk M, Santoro P, Roche E. Radiofrequency-induced thermal therapy: results of a European multicentre study of resistive ablation of incompetent truncal varicose veins. Phlebology. 2013;28(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2012.012013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Badham GE, Dos Santos SJ, Lloyd LBA, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS. One-year results of the use of endovenous radiofrequency ablation utilising an optimised radiofrequency-induced thermotherapy protocol for the treatment of truncal superficial venous reflux. Phlebology. 2017;33:298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355517696611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parsi K. Interaction of detergent sclerosants with cell membranes. Phlebology. 2015;30(5):306–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514534648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cooley-Andrade O, Cheung K, Chew AN, Connor DE, Parsi K. Detergent sclerosants at sub-lytic concentrations induce endothelial cell apoptosis through a caspase dependent pathway. Apoptosis. 2016;21(7):836–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-016-1252-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wollmann JC. The history of sclerosing foams. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(5):694–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ikponmwosa A, Abbott C, Graham A, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Gough MJ. The impact of different concentrations of sodium tetradecyl sulphate and initial balloon denudation on endothelial cell loss and tunica media injury in a model of foam sclerotherapy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(3):366–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Whiteley MS, Dos Santos SJ, Fernandez-Hart TJ, Lee CT, Li JM. Media damage following detergent sclerotherapy appears to be secondary to the induction of inflammation and apoptosis: an immunohistochemical study elucidating previous histological observations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(3):421–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.11.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lam YL, Lawson JA, Toonder IM, Shadid NH, Sommer A, Veenstra M, et al. Eight-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with surgical stripping of the great saphenous vein. British Journal of Surgery. 2018;105(6):692–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kendler M, Averbeck M, Simon JC, Ziemer M. Histology of saphenous veins after treatment with the ClariVein® device - an ex-vivo experiment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013;11(4):348–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boersma D, van Haelst ST, van Eekeren RR, Vink A, Reijnen MM, de Vries JP, de Borst GJ. Macroscopic and histologic analysis of vessel wall reaction after mechanochemical endovenous ablation using the clarivein OC device in an animal model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(2):290–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.11.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Whiteley MS, Dos Santos SJ, Lee CT, Li JM. Mechanochemical ablation causes endothelial and medial damage to the vein wall resulting in deeper penetration of sclerosant compared with sclerotherapy alone in extrafascial great saphenous vein using an ex vivo model. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(3):370–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Boersma D, van Eekeren RR, Werson DA, van der Waal RI, Reijnen MM, de Vries JP. Mechanochemical endovenous ablation of small saphenous vein insufficiency using the ClariVein(®) device: one-year results of a prospective series. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Todd KL, Wright D, Orfe E. The durability of polidocanol endovenous microfoam treatment effect on varicose vein symptoms and appearance in patients with saphenofemoral junction incompetence: one-year results from the VANISH-2 study. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2(1):112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.10.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chan YC, Law Y, Cheung GC, Cheng SW. Predictors of recanalization for incompetent great saphenous veins treated with cyanoacrylate glue. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(5):665–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chan YC, Law Y, Cheung GC, Ting AC, Cheng SW. Cyanoacrylate glue used to treat great saphenous reflux: measures of outcome. Phlebology. 2017;32(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355516638200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Proebstle TM, Alm J, Dimitri S, Rasmussen L, Whiteley M, Lawson J, Cher D, Davies A. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Frullini A, Fortuna D. Laser assisted foam sclerotherapy (LAFOS): a new approach to the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebologie. 2013;66(1):51–4.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Smarandache A. Laser beams interaction with polidocanol foam: molecular background. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30(5):262–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2011.3187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Brand FN, Dannenberg AL, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. The epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham Study. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(2):96–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Whiteley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whiteley, M.S. (2018). Recurrent Varicose Veins. In: Khanna, A., Jindal, R. (eds) Venous Disorders. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1108-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1108-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1107-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1108-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics