Skip to main content

Error Assessment of Fundamental Matrix Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICCCE 2018 (ICCCE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 500))

Abstract

Stereo image matching comprises of establishing epipolar geometry based on fundamental matrix estimation. Accuracy of the epipoles is governed by the fundamental matrix. A stereo image pair may contain errors on a systematic and/or random basis which determine the accuracy of the fundamental matrix required for matching. The algorithm used to extract the image pair correspondence, and the method used to estimate the correct parameters of the matrix, controls its accuracy further. A performance analysis of widely adopted matrix estimators over the point pairs found by correspondence determiners is undertaken in this chapter. The methods are modified for the best combination of results, based on the properties of the resulting fundamental matrix. Permutations are analyzed over the possible paths for obtaining the matrix parameters with the expected characteristics, followed by error analysis. Amongst the estimators analyzed, RAndom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) and M-estimator SAmple Consensus (MSAC) estimators were found to produce the best results over the features detected by the Harris–Stephens corner detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Version: 8.5.0.197613 (R2015a).

  2. 2.

    Primarily developed for solution of the essential matrix.

  3. 3.

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/vision/vasc/idb/www/html_permanent/index.html.

  4. 4.

    Boldfaced values with minimum of \(\sum _{er}\), \(\mu _{er}\), and \(\sigma _d\) are taken at once.

References

  1. Armangué X, Salvi J (2003) Overall view regarding fundamental matrix estimation. Imag Vision Comput 21(2):205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basah SN, Hoseinnezhad R, Bab-Hadiashar A (2014) Analysis of planar-motion segmentation using affine fundamental matrix. IET Comput Vis 8(6):658–669. http://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2013.0224

  3. Boudine B, Kramm S, Akkad NE, Bensrhair A, Saaidi A, Satori K (2016) A flexible technique based on fundamental matrix for camera self-calibration with variable intrinsic parameters from two views. J Vis Commun Imag Represent 39:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng Y, Lopez JA, Camps O, Sznaier M (2015) A convex optimization approach to robust fundamental matrix estimation. In: 2015 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 2170–2178. IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7298829/

  5. Longuet-Higgins HC (1981) A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature 293(5828):133–135. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/293133a0

  6. Luong QT, Faugeras OD (1996) The fundamental matrix: theory, algorithms, and stability analysis. Int J Comput Vis 17(1):43–75. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00127818

  7. Luong QT, Deriche R, Faugeras O, Papadopoulo T (1993) On determining the fundamental matrix: analysis of different methods and experimental results

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nistér D, Stewénius, H (2008) Linear time maximally stable extremal regions. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stehman SV, Czaplewski RL (1998) Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: fundamental principles. Remot Sens Environ 64(3):331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun C (2013) Trinocular stereo image rectification in closed-form only using fundamental matrices. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on image processing, pp 2212–2216. IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6738456/

  11. Torr P, Murray D (1997) The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix. Int J Comput Vis 24(3):271–300. http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1007927408552

  12. Torr P, Zisserman A, Maybank S (1998) Robust detection of degenerate configurations while estimating the fundamental matrix. Comput Vis Imag Understand 71(3):312–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Zhang Z, Liu Z (2016) Efficient image features selection and weighting for fundamental matrix estimation. IET Comput Vis 10(1):67–78. http://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2014.0436

  14. Zhang Z, Loop C (2001) Estimating the fundamental matrix by transforming image points in projective space

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou F, Zhong C, Zheng Q (2015) Method for fundamental matrix estimation combined with feature lines. Neurocomputing 160:300–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou Y, Kneip L, Li H (2015) A revisit of methods for determining the fundamental matrix with planes. In: 2015 International conference on digital image computing: techniques and applications (DICTA), pp 1–7. IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7371221/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bankim Chandra Yadav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yadav, B.C., Merugu, S., Jain, K. (2019). Error Assessment of Fundamental Matrix Parameters. In: Kumar, A., Mozar, S. (eds) ICCCE 2018. ICCCE 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 500. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0212-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0212-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0211-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0212-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics