Abstract
The computed tomography dose index (CTDI), has long been recognised as a metric to quantify the radiation output from a CT examination that is easily measured and that captures the majority of the scatter tails for even wide X-ray beam widths. International standards now require manufacturers to display the pitch-normalised metric (CTDIvol) prior to scan initiation and the radiology community has become very familiar to typical values of this metric. However, it has been suggested that modern developments in CT technology permit patient doses to be determined in a more adequate way that allows representing the risks to patients, and that is now time to forgo the use of the CTDI (or variants) for CT dose optimisation. In this work, we explore the main problems concerning the use of the CTDIvol as a relevant dose index through a retrospective study of 20 of the most common CT examinations at a South American imaging centre including adult and paediatric patients using a total of three CT scanners. Applicable results were compared with diagnostic reference levels (DRL’s) from European and North American countries. Our research shows that although CT technology is changing at a quick pace, CTDIvol keeps being a practical and valuable method for the task of dose optimisation because is well established and uniformly adopted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pandharipande, P V et al. (2015) CT in the emergency department: a real-time study of changes in physician decision making Radiology 278 3:812–821.
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37 2-4:1–332.
US Food and Drug Administration (2010) Initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
McNitt-Gray M F (2002) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT: radiation dose in CT Radiographics 22 6:1541–1553.
Shope T B et al. (1891) A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X–ray computed tomography Med Phys 8 4:488–495.
Task Group on Control of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography Ann ICRP 30:7–45.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography Annals of the ICRP 30 4:7–45.
European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography (1999) Report EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Boone J M (2007) The trouble with CTDI100 Med Phys 34 4:1364–1371.
Brenner D J et al. (2006) It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. Med Phys 33 5:1189–1191.
European Commission (2014). Radiation Protection No. 180 Diagnostic reference levels in thirty-six European countries (Part2/2). EC website. Accessed December 4, 2017.
Kanal, K. M., Butler, P. F., Sengupta, D., Bhargavan-Chatfield, M., Coombs, L. P., & Morin, R. L. (2017). US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology, 284(1), 120–133.
Matsunaga Y et al. (2015) Survey of volume CT dose index in Japan in 2014 Brit J Radiol 88 1052: 20150219.
FAO, IAEA, NEMOECD ILO, and WHO PAHO (1996) International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources (IBSS) IAEA safety series 115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ramírez, E., Benavides, O., Holguin, A., Castro, C., Lopera, W. (2019). On the CT Dose Index: Are we Meeting the Challenge?. In: Lhotska, L., Sukupova, L., Lacković, I., Ibbott, G.S. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-9034-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-9035-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)