Skip to main content

On the CT Dose Index: Are we Meeting the Challenge?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 68/1))

Abstract

The computed tomography dose index (CTDI), has long been recognised as a metric to quantify the radiation output from a CT examination that is easily measured and that captures the majority of the scatter tails for even wide X-ray beam widths. International standards now require manufacturers to display the pitch-normalised metric (CTDIvol) prior to scan initiation and the radiology community has become very familiar to typical values of this metric. However, it has been suggested that modern developments in CT technology permit patient doses to be determined in a more adequate way that allows representing the risks to patients, and that is now time to forgo the use of the CTDI (or variants) for CT dose optimisation. In this work, we explore the main problems concerning the use of the CTDIvol as a relevant dose index through a retrospective study of 20 of the most common CT examinations at a South American imaging centre including adult and paediatric patients using a total of three CT scanners. Applicable results were compared with diagnostic reference levels (DRL’s) from European and North American countries. Our research shows that although CT technology is changing at a quick pace, CTDIvol keeps being a practical and valuable method for the task of dose optimisation because is well established and uniformly adopted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pandharipande, P V et al. (2015) CT in the emergency department: a real-time study of changes in physician decision making Radiology 278 3:812–821.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37 2-4:1–332.

    Google Scholar 

  3. US Food and Drug Administration (2010) Initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McNitt-Gray M F (2002) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT: radiation dose in CT Radiographics 22 6:1541–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shope T B et al. (1891) A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X–ray computed tomography Med Phys 8 4:488–495.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Task Group on Control of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography Ann ICRP 30:7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography Annals of the ICRP 30 4:7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography (1999) Report EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boone J M (2007) The trouble with CTDI100 Med Phys 34 4:1364–1371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner D J et al. (2006) It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. Med Phys 33 5:1189–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Commission (2014). Radiation Protection No. 180 Diagnostic reference levels in thirty-six European countries (Part2/2). EC website. Accessed December 4, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanal, K. M., Butler, P. F., Sengupta, D., Bhargavan-Chatfield, M., Coombs, L. P., & Morin, R. L. (2017). US diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology, 284(1), 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matsunaga Y et al. (2015) Survey of volume CT dose index in Japan in 2014 Brit J Radiol 88 1052: 20150219.

    Google Scholar 

  14. FAO, IAEA, NEMOECD ILO, and WHO PAHO (1996) International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources (IBSS) IAEA safety series 115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Ramírez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ramírez, E., Benavides, O., Holguin, A., Castro, C., Lopera, W. (2019). On the CT Dose Index: Are we Meeting the Challenge?. In: Lhotska, L., Sukupova, L., Lacković, I., Ibbott, G.S. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-9034-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-9035-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics