Skip to main content
  • 153 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapters, various notions about social dialogue have been emphasized and the research outline about the theoretical framework was presented. At this stage, the primary issue that attracted attention was Turkish labour relations or more specifically social dialogue at the workplace level, which will be explained via existing theories and will be based on the historical background that is specific to Turkey. In this context, each of the existing theoretical approaches can explain a different aspect of the Turkish labour relations patterns. Moreover, there are forms of relations in which the theoretical approaches that are presented in the theoretical framework of the Turkish working life cannot be explained altogether. Therefore, there have been attempts to try and understand these forms of relations within both institutional traditions and personal expressions with the opinions of subjects representing working life. For this purpose, the hermeneutical approach has been selected as the method in this study and the in-depth interview is preferred as the basic research technique within the framework of the Delphi technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As a result of the interviews conducted for this book, it has been clearly determined that there is no consensus amongst the social partners about the mechanism of social dialogue at the workplace level. For example, Türk-İş and the unions affiliated to it generally have a negative attitude towards workplace representation, whereas trade unions organized under the DİSK and Hak-İş Confederations and independent trade unions have presented positive opinions.

References

  • Akkaya, Y. (2006). Öyleyse ne yapmalı? http://www.kizilbayrak.net/sinif-hareke-ti/haber/artikel/54/oeyleyse-8220neya.html?no_cache=1&cHash=78208c65d8. Accessed December 18, 2008.

  • BuÄŸra, A., Adaman, F., & Ä°nsel, A. (2004). Çalışma Hayatında Yeni GeliÅŸme- ler ve Türkiye’de Sendikaların DeÄŸiÅŸen Rolü. Ä°stanbul: BoÄŸaziçi Ãœniversitesi Sosyal Politika Forumu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S., & Upchurch, M. (2005). Workplace partnership and employee voice in the UK: Comparative case studies of union strategy and worker experience. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26, 593–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falzon, C. (2001). Foucault ve Sosyal Diyalog-Parçalanmanın Ötesi (H. Arslan, Trans.). Ä°stanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, J. G. (2007). Habermas (T. Kılıç, Trans.). Ankara: Dost Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunberg, L., Moore, S., & Greenberg, E. (1996). The relationship of employee ownership and participation to workplace safety. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 17(2), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S., & Adnett, N. (2006). Breaking the ICE: Workplace democracy in a modernized social Europe. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(6), 1021–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KaracaoÄŸlu, Ö. C. (2009). Ä°htiyaç Analizi ve Delphi TekniÄŸi; Öğretmenlerin EÄŸitim Ä°htiyacını Belirleme ÖrneÄŸi. In 1st International Conference on Educational Researches in Turkey, 1–3 May 2009, Çanakkale.

    Google Scholar 

  • KümbetoÄŸlu, B. (2005). Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve AraÅŸtırma. Ä°stanbul: BaÄŸlam Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lischeron, J. A., & Wall, T. D. (1975). Employee participation: An experimental field study. Human Relations, 28, 863–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, Åž. (2006). MÃœSÄ°AD - Anadolu Sermayesinin Dönüşümü ve Türk ModernleÅŸmesinin DerinleÅŸmesi. Ankara: Vadi Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åžahin, A. E. (2001). EÄŸitim AraÅŸtırmalarında Delphi TekniÄŸi ve Kullanımı. Hacettepe Ãœniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uçkan, B. (2005). AB’de Sosyal Diyalog: Danışma Komitelerinden Çerçeve AntlaÅŸmaları. Ä°stanbul Universitesi Ä°ktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 55(1), 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varçın, R. (1996) An analysis of conflict and cooperation in the informal sector of the economy in Turkey. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon, Department of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varçın, R. (2004). Ä°stihdam ve Ä°ÅŸgücü Piyasası Politikaları. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. A., Leana, C. R., Edwin, A. L., & Schweiger, D. M. (1997). Cognitive and motivational frameworks in U.S. research on participation: A metaanalysis of primary effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, E. (1997). Endüstri Ä°liÅŸkileri Teorileri: Sosyolojik Bir DeÄŸerlendirme. Adapazarı: DeÄŸiÅŸim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, E., & Uçkan, B. (2010). Ä°ÅŸverenlerin SendikasızlaÅŸtırma Modelleri ve Türkiye ÖrneÄŸi. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2010(2), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdem Cam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cam, E. (2019). Method. In: Social Dialogue and Democracy in the Workplace. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8482-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8482-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8481-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8482-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics