Abstract
Gifted and talented young people from low socio-economic backgrounds are consistently under-represented in gifted programmes in New Zealand schools. This chapter reports on a qualitative study that explored the lived experiences of 101 gifted New Zealand young people from low socio-economic backgrounds. An overarching question for this study was ‘What is it about gifted young people from low socio-economic backgrounds who have achieved to exceptional levels, that has enabled them to do so?’ The risk and resilience construct was used as a lens through which to explore their experiences across a range of contexts. These young people reflected on their perceptions of their giftedness and socio-economic circumstances, their childhoods and school experiences, and their home lives. The stories of the participants in this study indicated that there are particular risks associated with both giftedness and low socio-economic status, and contribute to ideas about how these young people might be more effectively supported to develop their potential.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While New Zealand does not have an official poverty measure, a measure for poverty commonly used in official reports in New Zealand is a household equivalent disposable income set at 60% of the median, after adjusting for housing costs (Boston, 2014; Simpson et al., 2016).
- 2.
A school’s decile rating indicates the proportion of its students that come from low socio-economic communities (Ministry of Education, 2008b). Schools are ranked from decile 1 to decile 10, with decile 1 schools drawing the highest proportion of students from low socio-economic communities. At the time of writing, a proposal has been made by the New Zealand government to remove the decile rating system in New Zealand in favour of another school funding mechanism.
- 3.
A number of Pacific nations were represented in the survey, predominantly by Samoan, Tongan, Cook Island, Fijian, and Niuean individuals.
- 4.
The discrepancy in numbers here reflects the opportunity for participants to select all ethnicities that they identified with. Other ethnicities represented amongst survey participants included Indian, Chinese, Vietnamese, Australian, and Latin American.
- 5.
Participants were also able to nominate more than one area of talent if this was applicable. The total number of responses here indicates that most participants selected more than one talent area.
- 6.
For a more extensive discussion of the risk and protective factors and processes identified in this model, please see the original thesis (Ballam, 2013).
References
Ballam, N. (2013).‘ Defying the odds’: gifted and talented young people from low socioeconomic backgrounds. (PhD thesis, University of Waikato, 2013). Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/8424/thesis.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Biddulph, F., Biddulph, J., & Biddulph, C. (2003). The complexity of community and family influences on children’s achievement in New Zealand: best evidence synthesis. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Bland, L. C., & Sowa, C. J. (1994). An overview of resilience in gifted children. Roeper Review,, 17(2), 77–80.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
Borland, J. H., Schnur, R., & Wright, L. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: a postpositivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 13–32.
Boston, J. (2014). Child poverty in New Zealand: why it matters and how it can be reduced. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(9), 962–988.
Brocki, J. M., & Wearden, A. J. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 21(1), 87–108.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). The bioecological theory of human development. In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human (pp. 3–15). Thousand Oaks: Sage. (Reprinted from N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 6963–6970). New York: Elsevier, 2001.)
Burney, V. H., & Beilke, J. R. (2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(3), 295–321.
Carroll, P., Casswell, S., Huakau, J., Howden-Chapman, P., & Perry, P. (2011). The widening gap: perceptions of poverty and income inequalities and implications for health and social outcomes. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 37, 1–12.
Carter, K., Gunasekara, F. I., & Blakely, T. (2013). The relationship between trends in income inequalities and poverty in New Zealand. Policy Quarterly, 9(2), 24–29.
Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted. (8th ed.) Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Clasen, D. R., & Clasen, R. E. (1997). Mentoring: a time-honored option for education of the gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. 2nd ed. (pp. 218–229). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Coleman, L. (2006). Talent development in economically disadvantaged populations. Gifted Child Today, 29(2), 22–27.
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Davidson, H. H., & Greenberg, J. W. (1967). Traits of school achievers from a deprived background. Washington: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179–194). London: Sage.
Egan-Bitran, M. (2010). ‘This is how I see it’: children, young people, and young adults’ views and experiences of poverty. Wellington: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59(2), 77–92.
Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty. (2012). Solutions to child poverty in New Zealand: evidence for action. Wellington: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty. (2013). Child poverty in New Zealand: building on progress to date. Wellington: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
Fletcher, M., & Dwyer, M. (2008). A fair go for all children: actions to address child poverty in New Zealand. Wellington: Children’s Commissioner.
Frierson, E. C. (1965). Upper and lower status gifted children: a study of differences. Exceptional Children, 32(2), 83–90.
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. 3rd ed. (pp. 60–74). Boston: Pearson Education.
Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. Macfarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: the festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 61–80). Waco: Prufrock Press Inc.
Galbraith, G., & Delisle, J. (2015). When gifted kids don’t have all the answers: how to meet their social and emotional needs. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.
Gallagher, J. J. (2008). Psychology, psychologists, and gifted students. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 1–11). New York: : Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
Gibb, S. J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2012). Childhood family income and life outcomes in adulthood: findings from a 30-year longitudinal study in New Zealand. Social Science & Medicine, 74(12), 1979–1986.
Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2008). Phenomenology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 2nd ed. (pp. 26–52). London: Sage.
Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualisation of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(2), 121–132.
Gunasekara, F. I., & Carter, C. (2012). Dynamics of income in children in New Zealand, 2002–2009: a descriptive analysis of the Survey of Family, Income and Employment. Wellington: Department of Public Health.
Harvey, J., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2004). Psychological resilience in disadvantaged youth: a critical overview. Australian Psychologist, 39, 3–13.
Hunsaker, S. L., Frasier, M. M., Frank, E., Finley, V., & Klekotka, P. (1995). Performance of economically disadvantaged students placed in gifted programmes through the research-based assessment plan. Storrs: The National Research Centre on the Gifted and Talented.
Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs: the exclusive biography. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Katz, M. (1997). On playing a poor hand well: insights from the lives of those who have overcome childhood risks and adversities. New York: Norton.
Luthar, S. (1991). Vulnerability and resilience: a study of high-risk adolescents. Child Development, 62, 600–616.
Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in development: a synthesis of research across five decades. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Volume three: risk, disorder, and adaptation. 2nd ed. (pp. 739–795). New York: Wiley.
Masten, A. S. (2002). Ordinary magic: a resilience framework for policy, practice, and prevention. Paper presented at the Conference on Risk and Resilience: Protective Mechanisms and School-Based Prevention Programmes, 25–27 October, 2002, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.
Masten, A. S., & Obradovic, J. (2006). Competence and resilience in development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 13–27.
McAlpine, D. (2005). What do we mean by gifted and talented? Concepts and definitions. In D. McAlpine & R. Moltzen (Eds.), Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives (pp. 33–65). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
Ministry of Education. (2000). Gifted and talented students: meeting their needs in New Zealand schools. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2008a). Gifted and talented students: initiatives for gifted and talented learners. Retrieved from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/gifted/initiatives_e.php
Ministry of Education. (2008b) The National Administration Guidelines (NAGs). Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/educationSectors/Schools/PolicyAndStrategy/PlanningReportingRelevantLegislationNEGSAndNAGS/TheNationalAdministrationGuidelinesNAGs.aspx
Ministry of Education. (2008c). Nurturing gifted and talented children: a parent-teacher-partnership. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Gifted and talented students: meeting their needs in New Zealand schools. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Social Development. (2010). The social report: indicators of social wellbeing in New Zealand. Wellington: Author.
Moltzen, R. (2005). Realising potential: investigating the life stories of gifted New Zealand adults. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Moltzen, R. (2011). Historical perspectives. In R. Moltzen (Ed.), Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives. 3rd ed. (pp. 1–30). Auckland: Pearson Education.
Morales, E. E. (2010). Linking strengths: identifying and exploring protective factor clusters in academically resilient low-socioeconomic urban students of colour. Roeper Review, 32, 164–175.
Mueller, C. E. (2009). Protective factors as barriers to depression in gifted and nongifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 3–14.
Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. & Moon, S. (Eds.) (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: what do we know?. Waco: Prufrock Press.
O’Brien, M., Claire Dale, St., M., & John, S. (2011). Child poverty and inequality. In M. Claire Dale, M. O’Brien & S. St. John (Eds.), Left further behind: how policies fail the poorest children in New Zealand. Auckland: Child Poverty Action Group.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2012). Solutions to child poverty in New Zealand: issues and options paper for consultation. Wellington: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Against the odds: disadvantaged students who succeed in school. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2006/47092225.pdf
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). OECD economic surveys New Zealand. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Parkyn, G. (1948). Children of high intelligence: a New Zealand study. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Perry, B. (2014). Household incomes in New Zealand: trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982 to 2013. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Stocking, V. B. (2000). Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools, 16(1–2), 83–93.
Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1998). Applying the construct of resilience in schools: cautions from a developmental systems perspective. School Psychology Review, 27, 407–417.
Piirto, J. (2007). Talented children and adults: their development and education. (3rd ed.) Waco: Prufrock Press.
Prom-Jackson, S., Johnson, S. T., Wallace, M. B. (1987). Home environment, talented minority youth, and school achievement. The Journal of Negro Education, 56(1), 111–121.
Pungello, E. P., Kupersmidt, J. B., Burchinal, M. R., & Patterson, C. J. (1996). Environmental risk factors and children’s achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 775–767.
Reid, K., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2005). Exploring lived experience: an introduction to interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychologist, 18, 20–23.
Reis, S. M., Colbert, R. D., & Hébert, T. P. (2005). Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school. Roeper Review, 27(2), 110–120.
Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Emerging concpetions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10(2), 67–75
Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. 3rd ed. (pp. 75––87). Boston: Pearson Education.
Riley, T. (2004). Looking ahead: research to inform practice in the education of gifted and talented students in New Zealand. APEX: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 14(1), Retrieved from http://www.giftedchildren.org.nz/apex/v14no1art01.php.
Roe, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.
Rutter, M. (2007). Resilience, competence and coping. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 205–209.
Schoon, I., Parsons, S., & Sacker, A. (2004). Socioeconomic adversity, educational resilience, and subsequent levels of adult adaptation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(4), 383–404.
Seeley, K. (2003). High risk gifted learners. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. 3rd ed. (pp. 444–451). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Shavinina, L. (Ed.) (2009). International handbook on giftedness. New York: Springer.
Shumow, L. (1997). Daily experiences and adjustment of gifted low-income urban children at home and school. Roeper Review, 20(1), 35–38.
Simonton, D. K. (2005). Genetics of giftedness: the implications of an emergenic-epigenetic model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 312–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, J., Duncanson, M., Oben, G., Wicken, A., & Gallagher, S. (2016). Child poverty monitor 2015: technical report. Dunedin: NZ Child & Youth Epidemiology Service, University of Otago.
Smith, S. (2001). J. K. Rowling: a biography. London: Michael O’Mara Books.
Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology, 1, 39–54.
Smith, J. A., & Dunworth, F. (2003). Qualitative methods in the study of development. In K. Connolly & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 603–621). London: Sage.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 2nd ed. (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.
Stewart, R. E., & Porath, M. (1999). From childhood rags to adult riches. High Ability Studies, 10(2), 197–211.
St. John, S., & Wynd, D. (2008). Growing inequality and child poverty. In S. St John & D. Wynd (Eds.), Left behind: how social and income inequalities damage New Zealand children (pp. 12–26). Auckland: Child Poverty Action Group.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. 3rd ed. (pp. 45–59). Boston: Pearson Education.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1989). The role of the family in the success of the disadvantaged gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1, 22–36.
Werner, E. E. (1993). Risk, resilience, and recovery: perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 5(4), 502–515.
Werner, E. E. (2000). Protective factors and individual resilience. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention. 2nd ed. (pp. 115–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: a longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw Hill.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books.
Wynd, D. (2011). Hunger for learning: nutritional barriers to children’s education. Auckland: Child Poverty Action Group.
Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 2nd ed. 35–251). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ballam, N. (2017). Risk and Resilience in Gifted Young People from Low Socio-Economic Backgrounds. In: Ballam, N., Moltzen, R. (eds) Giftedness and Talent. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6701-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6701-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6700-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6701-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)