Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Smart Girls in the Media: The Impact of Popular Culture on the Development of Adolescent Rural Gifted Girls’ Identity and Subsequent Talent Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Giftedness and Talent

Abstract

Popular culture is recognised as having an influence on young people but its impact on the talent development of adolescent rural gifted girls is under-researched. While models of female talent development define the personal attributes and environmental elements that consistently influence gifted women’s lives, no existing models have explicitly addressed the impact of popular culture, or rurality, on the talent development process. The research that was the basis of this chapter showcased the voices of adolescent gifted girls from a rural setting in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, speaking on this topic. Gagné’s (2008) work framed this examination of the catalysts and impacts within their lives. The girls involved in this study described popular culture as being both supportive and disruptive. Two key responses emerged: a literal, uncritical response that built connections with peers; and a critical response regarding stereotypes in media images. For these girls, popular culture was a source of information and a guide to lifestyle; the research suggested that despite the challenges its presence creates in their lives, it could be used judiciously to support talent development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using diaries for social research. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, N., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2008). ‘High and dry’ in rural Australia: obstacles to student aspirations and expectations. Rural Society, 19(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Ihrig, D., & Forstadt, L. (2006). Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(4), 283–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S., Knight, B. A., & Riley, D. (1995). Addressing the needs of the gifted in rural areas: The Armidale Catholic Schools Office project. Education in Rural Australia, 5(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, M. K. (1999). The body of evidence: dangerous intersections between development and culture in the lives of adolescent girls. In S. R. Mazzarella & N. O. Percora (Eds.), Growing up girls: popular culture and the construction of identity (pp. 209–225). New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. S. (2005). Outwit, outlast, out-flirt? The women of reality TV. In J. H. Daniel and E. Cole (Eds.), Featuring females: feminist analyses of media (Chapter 5, pp. 71–83). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capper, M. R., Foust, R. C., Callahan, C. M., & Albaugh, S. B. (2009). Grade and gender difference in gifted students’ self-concepts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(3), 340–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. E. (2010). Raunch culture goes to school: young women, normative femininities and elite education. Media International Australia, 135, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheu, H. F. (2007). Disney and girlhood. In C. A. Mitchell & J. Reid-Walsh (Eds.), Girl culture: an encyclopedia [two volumes] (pp. 48–56). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & New, J. (2001). Gifted voices from rural America. Iowa City: The University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti, L. (1993). Using diaries in social research. Social Research Update 2. Guildford: University of Surrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire, P., Macdougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohnt, H. K., & Tiggemann, M. (2006). Body image concerns in young girls: the role of peers and media prior to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C. (2002). Girls: feminine adolescence in popular culture and cultural theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 832–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duits, L. (2008). Multi-girl culture: an ethnography of doing identity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/lib/uow/reader.action?docID=10314667andppg=8

  • Durham, M. G. (1998). Dilemmas of desire: representations of adolescent sexuality in two teen magazines. Youth and Society, 29(3), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, J. (2005). Gender and achievement: what have exams got to do with it? Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrianesi, B., Jones, S. C., & Reid, A. (2008). Are pre-adolescent girls’ magazines providing age-appropriate role models? Health Education, 108(6), 437–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, B. (2004). Spicy strategies: pop feminist and other empowerments in girl culture. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: culture, power and identity (pp. 155–162). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2008). Building gifts into talents: brief overview of the DMGT 2.0. Handout provided by Gagné [publishing details unknown].

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendenning, A. (1998). Family life, health and lifestyles in rural areas: the role of self-esteem. Health Education, 2(March), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, L. T. (1987). Girl prodigies: some evidence and some speculations. Roeper Review, 10(2), 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (1998). The “me” behind the mask: intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20(3), 167–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hains, R. C. (2007). “Pretty smart”: subversive intelligence in girl power cartoons. In S. A. Inness (Ed.), Geek chic: smart women in popular culture (pp. 65–84). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (2008). What’s happening to our girls?. Melbourne: Viking Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2004). Introduction. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: culture, power and identity (pp. xvii–xxv). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. (2006). The focus group interview: rising to the challenge in qualitative researchmethodology. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 05.1–05.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., & Ramazanoglu, C. (1995). Accounting for sexuality, living sexual politics: can feminist research be valid? In J. Holland & M. Blair (Eds.), Debates and issues in feminist research and pedagogy (pp. 273–291). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inness, S. A. (2007). Introduction: who remembers Sabrina? Intelligence, gender, and the media. In S. A. Inness (Ed.), Geek chic: smart women in popular culture (pp. 1–10). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Krause, K., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: findings from 1994 to 2009. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlyn, K. (2006). Feminism in the classroom: teaching towards the third wave. In J. Hollows & R. Moseley (Eds.), Feminism in popular culture (pp. 57–78). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. C. (2006). Girls make media. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., & Willis, S. (1997). Answering back: girls, boys and feminism in schools. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A., & Larson, A. (2007). How gifted girls become eminent women. In S. Lopez (Ed.), Positive psychology perspectives. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A., & Sodano, S. (2003). Career assessment with intellectually gifted students. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(2), 168–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703011002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, N. (1993). Women and power. London: BBC Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, B. E., & Short, E. B. (1991). Changes in emotional resilience: gifted adolescent females. Roeper Review, 13(3), 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, L. R. (1991). The social construction of ability perceptions: an ethnographic study of gifted adolescent girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(3), 340–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson, K. (2008). Hiltonism, hedonism and the self. Ethics and Education, 3(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, L. (2008). Allies in the family contributing to the development of eminence in women. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 17(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, L. (2009). Passionate engagement in domains contributes to eminent women’s talent development. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(1), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, J., & Daniels, R. (1993). Gifted girls in a rural community: math attitudes and career options. Exceptional Children, 59(6), 513–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. K. (2009). Rural gifted education: a comprehensive literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 461–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea-Wood, S. S., & Clunies-Ross, G. (1995). Self-esteem of gifted adolescent girls in Australian schools. Roeper Review, 17(3), 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. South Melbourne:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, J. R. (2012). Mean girls: why reality shows put women in a bad light. Multichannel News, Special Report, February 20, 2012. Retrieved from www.multichannel.com

  • Mann, J. (1994). The difference: discovering the hidden ways we silence girls—finding alternatives that can give them a voice. New York: Warner Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K., Gardiner, M., & Grealy, T. (2004). The incidence of perfectionism and self-handicapping gifted female students: an investigative study. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 13(2), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2005). Being smart about gifted children. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, M. (2007). Career counselling is personal counselling: a constructivist approach to nurturing the development of gifted female adolescents. Career Development Quarterly, 55(3), 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, J. D., & Barcinas, J. D. T. (1991). Differences between rural and urban schools, student characteristics, and student aspirations in Ohio. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 7(2), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A., & McCabe, T. (1981). Feminism for girls: an adventure story. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, L. M. R. (2000). Gender roles and achievement-related choices: a comparison of early adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(2), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, L. (1999). Combining focus groups and interviews: telling how it is; telling how it feels. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice (pp. 36–46). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12(1), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. (2004). Broadening perspectives to meet the needs of gifted learners in rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. M. (2003). Personal talent. High Ability Studies, 14(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D. (2002). Bad boys and good girls? Patterns of interaction and response in whole class teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 339–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920220137430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, I. (2006). American sweethearts: teenage girls in twentieth century popular culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, K. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1999). To thine own self be true: a new model of female talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 140–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendarvis, E., & Wood, E. W. (2009). Eligibility of historically underrepresented students referred for gifted education in a rural school district: a case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, scientists, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2000). The Piirto pyramid of talent development. Gifted Child Today, 23(6), 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, E. (1991). Women and moral identity. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Centre: Creative Learning Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2001). External barriers experienced by gifted and talented girls and women. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2002). Internal barriers, personal issues, and decisions faced by gifted and talented females. Gifted Child Today, Winter, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renegar, V. R., & Sowards, S. K. (2009). Contradiction as agency: self-determination, transcendence, and counter-imagination in third wave feminism. Hypatia, 24(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E., & Allan, A. (2006). Bright and beautiful: high achieving girls: ambivalent femininities and the feminisation of success in the primary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(4), 457–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2008). Losing self to the future? Young women’s strategic responses to adulthood transitions. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(3), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Wilson, S., & Welsh, M. C. (2012). Vocational knowledge in rural children: a study of individual differences and predictors of occupational aspirations and expectations. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 862–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober, B., Reimann, R., & Wagner, P. (2004). Is research on gender-specific underachievement in gifted girls an obsolete topic? New findings on an often discussed issue. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). Education, occupation and earnings: achievement in the early career. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve, A. (1989). Women together, women alone. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorelli, N. (1997). Reflections of girls in the media: a content analysis. A study of television shows and commercials, movies, music videos and teen magazine articles and ads. Oakland: Children Now and Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2009). Gender ‘matters’ in the primary classroom: pupils’ and teachers’ perspectives. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smutny, J. F. (2007). Reclaiming the lives of gifted girls and women. Unionville: Royal Fireworks Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. C. (2008). What is third wave feminism? A new directions essay. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(1), 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tally, M. (2007). Representations of girls and young women in film: an entry point to studying girl culture. In C. Mitchell & J. Reid-Walsh (Eds.), Girl culture: an encyclopedia (pp. 108–115) [2 volumes]. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. 3rd ed. (pp. 45–59). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2003). Thin ideals in music television: a source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(1), 48–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought: a comprehensive introduction, North Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialle, W., Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: social, emotional and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong Youth study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 569–586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701786046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1993). “Daddy’s going to buy you a dream to cling to (and mummy’s going to love you just as much as she can)”: Young girls and popular television. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Reading audiences: young people and the media (pp. 74–88). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshaw, M. (2006). Girls’ workplace destinations in a changed social landscape: girls and their mothers talk. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(5), 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M., & Harrison, K. (2005). The impact of media use on girls’ beliefs about gender roles, their bodies, and sexual relationships: a research synthesis. In J. H. Daniel & E. Cole (Eds.), Featuring females: feminist analyses of media (pp. 3–23). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., & Durik, A. M. (2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls: a motivational analysis of high school enrolments in Australia and the USA. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 642–659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610719119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2013). “Should I stay or should I go?” Rural and remote students in first year university STEM courses. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 23(2), 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Damsels in discourse: girls consuming and producing identity texts through Disney princess play. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 57–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.3. Retrieved from.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. M. (2015). Beauty or Brains? The impact of popular culture on the development of adolescent rural gifted girls’ identity and subsequent talent development. Unpublished thesis. Wollongong: Wollongong University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, E. H. (2005). Factors that contribute to talented performance: a theoretical model from a Chinese perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yegedis, B. L., & Weinbach, R. W. (2006). Research methods for social workers. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, D., & Dubowitz, N. (2005). Clash of cultures: women and girls on TV and in real life. In J. H. Daniel & E. Cole (Eds.), Featuring females: feminist analyses of media (pp. 59–69). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia

    Denise Wood

Authors
  1. Denise Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Wood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Nadine Ballam

  2. Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Roger Moltzen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wood, D. (2017). Smart Girls in the Media: The Impact of Popular Culture on the Development of Adolescent Rural Gifted Girls’ Identity and Subsequent Talent Development. In: Ballam, N., Moltzen, R. (eds) Giftedness and Talent. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6701-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6701-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6700-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6701-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation