Skip to main content

Designing Augmented, Domestic Environments to Support Ageing in Place

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assistive Augmentation

Part of the book series: Cognitive Science and Technology ((CSAT))

Abstract

[S]tereotypes are useful for camouflaging the social arrangements which we impose upon the aged members of our society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ackerman MS, Starr B (1995) Social activity indicators: interface components for CSCW systems. In: Paper presented to the proceedings of the 8th annual ACM symposium on user interface and software technology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angelini L, Caon M, Carrino S, Bergeron L, Nyffeler N, Jean-Mairet M, Mugellini E (2013) Designing a desirable smart bracelet for older adults. In: International joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing (UbiComp’ 13), Zurich, Switzerland, pp 425–434

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asquith N (2009) Positive ageing, neoliberalism and Australian sociology. J Soc 45(3):255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartlett H, Carroll M (2010) Capacity building in ageing research: key successes and challenges of the Australian experience. Gener Rev 20(4):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baskinger M (2007a) Autonomy + the aging population: designing empowerment into home appliances. In: Feijs L, Kyffin S, Young B (eds) DeSForM Design and semantics of form and movement, pp 133–146

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baskinger M (2007b) Experientializing home appliances to empower the aging population for autonomous living. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on designing for user eXperiences. ACM, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bekker T, Sturm J, Barakova E (2010) Design for social interaction through physical play in diverse contexts of use. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14(5):381–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blythe M, Monk A (2005) Net Neighbours: adapting HCI methods to cross the digital divide. Interact Comput 17(1):35–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caine KE, Zimmerman CY, Schall-Zimmerman Z, Hazlewood WR, Camp LJ, Connelly KH, Huber LL, Shankar K (2011) DigiSwitch: a device to allow older adults to monitor and direct the collection and transmission of health information collected at home. J Med Syst, pp 1181–1195

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caine KE, Zimmerman CY, Schall-Zimmerman Z, Hazlewood WR, Sulgrove AC, Camp LJ, Connelly KH, Huber LL, Shankar K (2010) DigiSwitch: design and evaluation of a device for older adults to preserve privacy while monitoring health at home. In: International health informatics (IHI ‘10). Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp 153–162

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng Q, Juen J, Li Y, Prieto-Centurion V, Krishnan JA, Schatz BR (2013) GaitTrack: Health monitoring of body motion from spatio-temporal parameters of simple smartphones. In: Bioinformatics, computational biology and biomedical informatics

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cornejo R, Hernández D, Favela J, Tentori M, Ochoa S (2012) Persuading older adults to socialize and exercise through ambient games. In: 2012 6th International Conference on, Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Pervasive Health), IEEE, pp 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cornejo R, Tentori M, Favela J (2013) Ambient awareness to strengthen the family social network of older adults. In: Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  14. Croci V (2010) Relational interactive architecture. Archit Des 80(3):122–125

    Google Scholar 

  15. Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E (1981) The meaning of things: domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson JL, Jensen C (2013) What health topics older adults want to track: a participatory design study. In: International conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’13). Bellevue, WA, USA, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction, Kindle edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fernaeus Y, Tholander J, Jonsson M (2008) Beyond representations: towards an action-centric perspective on tangible interaction. Int J Arts Technol 1(3/4):249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fox MA, Yeh BP (1999) Intelligent kinetic systems. Prep MANSEE 99

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fozard JL (2002) Gerontechnology—beyond ergonomics and universal design. Gerontechnol 1(3):137–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaver WH, Hooker B, Dunne A, Farrington P (2001) The presence project. RCA Computer Related Design Research, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grosinger J, Vetere F, Fitzpatrick G (2012) Agile life: addressing knowledge and social motivations for active aging. In: Paper presented to the OZCHI’12, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harvey PW, Thurnwald I (2009) Ageing well, ageing productively: the essential contribution of Australia’s ageing population to the social and economic prosperity of the nation. Health Soc Rev 18(4):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hazan H (1994) Old age: constructions and deconstruction, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hernández-Encuentra E, Pousada M, Gómez-Zúñiga B (2009) ICT and older people: beyond usability. Educ Gerontol 35(3):226–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holl S (2010) Housing Complex, Fukuoka. In: Ebner P, Herrmann E, Höllbacher R, Kuntscher M, Wietzorrek U (eds) Typology +. Berhäuser Verlag AG, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  27. Holtzblatt K, Beyer H (2014) Contextual design: evolved, Morgan & Claypool

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hornecker E, Buur J (2006) Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Paper presented to the proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp 22–27, April, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ishii H (2008a) Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In: Paper presented to the proceedings of the 2nd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ishii H (2008) The tangible user interface and its evolution. Commun ACM 51(6):32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jalaliniya S, Pederson T (2012) A wearable kid’s health monitoring system on smartphone.In: NordiCHI, pp 791–792

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kendig H, Browning C (2011) Directions for ageing well in a healthy Australia. Acad Soc Sci 31(2):23–30

    Google Scholar 

  34. Khovanskaya V, Baumer EP, Cosley D, Voida S, Gay G (2013) Everybody knows what you’re doing: a critical design approach to personal informatics. In: CHI, pp 3403–3412

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lawson B (2001), The language of space, Architectural Press

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lawson S, Jamison-Powell S, Garbett A, Linehan C, Kucharczyk E, Verbaan S, Rowland DA, Morgan K (2013) Validating a mobile phone application for the everyday, unobtrusive, objective measurement of sleep. In: Paper presented to the proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leonardi C, Mennecozzi C, Not E, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M, Gennai F, Cristoforetti A (2009) Knocking on elders’ door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space. In: Paper presented to the CHI 2009, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li I. Dey AK, Forlizzi J (2011) Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. UbiComp, pp 405–414

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mäyrä F, Soronen A, Vadén T (2004) Future proactive homes: some design principles. NordiCHI, Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  40. National Health and Medical Research Council (2004) Ageing well, ageing productively, Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/grants/types-funding/-z-list-funding-types/ageing-well-ageing-productively-program-grant

  41. Negroponte N (2009) Being digital. Random House, Audible.com edn

    Google Scholar 

  42. Norman DA, Draper SW (1986) User-centred system design: new perspectives on HCI. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  43. Östlund B (2004) Social science research on technology and the elderly—does it exist? Sci Stud 17(2):44–62

    Google Scholar 

  44. Östlund B (2005) Design paradigms and misunderstood technology: the case of older users. In: Östlund B (ed) Young technologies in old hands: an international view on senior citizens’ utilization of ICT. DJOF Publishing, Copenhagen, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  45. Östlund B (2008) The revival of research circles: meeting the needs of modern aging and the third age. Educ Gerontol 34(4):255–266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Pang CE, Neustaedter C, Riecke BE, Oduor E, Hillman S (2013) Technology preferences and routines for sharing health information during the treatment of a chronic illness. In: CHI, pp 1759–1768

    Google Scholar 

  47. Parkes A, Poupyrev I, Ishii H (2008) Designing kinetic interactions for organic user interfaces. Commun ACM 51(6):58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pedell S, Vetere F, Kulik L, Ozanne E, Gruner A (2010) Social isolation of older people: the role of domestic technologies. In: Paper presented to the OzCHI 2010 CHISIG, ACM, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  49. Riche Y, Mackay W (2010) PeerCare: supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. Comput Supported Coop Work (CSCW) 19(1):73–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Robertson T, Durick J, Brereton M, Vaisutis K, Vetere F, Nansen B, Howard S (2013) Emerging technologies and the contextual and contingent experiences of ageing well. In: Kotzé P, Marsden G, Lindgaard G, Wesson J, Winckler M (eds) Human-computer interaction—INTERACT 2013, vol 8119. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 582–589

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Robertson T, Durick J, Brereton M, Vetere F, Howard S, Nansen B (2012) Knowing our users: scoping interviews in design research with ageing participants. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian computer-human interaction conference, ACM, pp 517–520

    Google Scholar 

  52. Romero N, Sturm J, Bekker T, de Valk L, Kruitwagen S (2010) Playful persuasion to support older adults’ social and physical activities. Interact Comput 22(6):485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schnädelbach H (2010) Adaptive architecture–a conceptual framework. In: Interaction of architecture, media and social phenomena, p 523

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sherbini K, Krawczyk R (2004) Overview of intelligent architecture. In: Paper presented to the 1st ASCAAD international conference, e-design in architecture, KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, December, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sperry L, Prosen H (1996) Aging in the twenty-first century: a developmental perspective. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. Turkle S (ed) (2008) The inner history of devices. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vaisutis K, Brereton M, Robertson T, Vetere F, Durick J, Nansen B, Buys L (2014) Invisible connections: investigating older people’s emotions and social relations around objects. In: Paper presented to the CHI 2014, Toronto, Cananda

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wagner I (2011) Building urban narratives: collaborative site-seeing and envisioning in the MR tent. Comput Supported Coop Work (CSCW) 21(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. World Health Organization (WHO) 2002 Active ageing: a policy framework, pp 1–59

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yeoh BSA, Huang S (2009) Foreign domestic workers and home-based care for elders in Singapore. J Aging Soc Policy 22(1):69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeannette Durick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Durick, J., Leung, L. (2018). Designing Augmented, Domestic Environments to Support Ageing in Place. In: Huber, J., Shilkrot, R., Maes, P., Nanayakkara, S. (eds) Assistive Augmentation. Cognitive Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6404-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6404-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6402-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6404-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics