Abstract
Practicing within the university setting influences artists’ identity , approach to their practice and the artwork they produce. Although there are examples of ‘good research producing bad art’, this does not automatically have to be the case. Academics whose practice is undertaken as artistic research adopt a range of strategies to balance their work as artists and academics. Despite fears that notions of artistic excellence will be affected by university conceptions of research in the newer generation of artistic researchers, these academic staff are aware of the challenges and ready to take up the baton to secure equal recognition and support for their research as the older generation retires.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
SymbioticA artists have received Australia Council Fellowships and inclusion in arts biennale, exhibitions and festivals.
- 2.
ERA specifically excludes ‘student work’ from consideration.
- 3.
Artistic Practice in Music, a project being conducted by Vanessa Tomlinson, Queensland Conservatorium Research Centre, and Jenny Wilson, as yet unpublished.
- 4.
References
Baker, S., & Schippers, H. (2007, April 4). Arts research on its own terms. The Australian.
Bazeley, P. (2006). Research dissemination in creative arts, humanities and the social sciences. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(3), 307–321.
Bell, D. (2006). Creative film and media practice as research: In pursuit of that obscure object of knowledge. Journal of Media Practice, 7(2), 85–100.
Bennett, D., Blom, D., & Wright, D. (2009). Artist academics: Performing the Australian research agenda. International Journal of Education and the Arts 10(17).
Borgdorff, H. (2008). Artistic research and academia: An uneasy relationship. The Yearbook on Artistic Research. (pp. 82–97, 192–208), Swedish Research Council.
Brook, S. (2016). The creative turn in Australian higher education In R. Comunian & A. Gilmore (Eds.), Higher Education and the Creative Economy: Beyond the Campus (pp. 242–260). Abingdon: Routledge.
Buckley, B., & Conomos, J. (2004). The Australian Research Council funding model condemns art schools to a bleak future. ON LINE opinion: Australia’s e-Journal of Social and Political Debate. http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=2527
Bullen, E., Robb, S., & Kenway, J. (2004). ‘Creative destruction’: Knowledge economy policy and the future of the arts and humanities in the academy. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1), 3–22.
Burr, S. (2010). Around the Room: A summary of the symposium discussions. Creative and Practice Led Research Symposium. Canberra. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue8/Burr.pdf
Cornford, F. M. (1908). Microcosmographia Academica: Being a guide for the young academic politician. Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes Publishers Ltd.
Coryn, C. L. (2006). The use and abuse of citations as indicators of research quality. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 4, 115–121.
DeBoer, L. (2002). Engagingly liberal? The arts go to college. Paper presented at the Institute for the Liberal Arts sponsored workshop at Westmont. http://www.westmont.edu/institute/pdfs/DeBoer.pdf
Durst, D. (1957). Artists and college art teaching. College Art Journal, 16(3), 222–229.
Eckersall, P. (2004). Drama: The Gekidan Kaitaisha-NYID ‘Journey to Con-fusion’ project: A case study for the interaction of research imperatives for artists and scholars in the performing arts. In R. Wissler, B. Haseman, S.-A. Wallace, & M. Keane (Eds.), Innovation in Australian arts, media and design: Fresh challenges for the tertiary sector (pp. 29–40). Maryborough, Queensland: Post Pressed.
Elkins, J. (2006). On beyond research and new knowledge. In K. Macleod & L. Holdridge (Eds.), Thinking through art: Reflections on art as practice (pp. 241–247), Routledge.
Fitzgerald, M. (2003). Artist researchers: Gatecrashers at the university high table? Paper presented at the ACUADS 2003 Conference. University of Tasmania, Hobart.
Gee, C. B. (2007). Valuing the arts on their own terms? (Ceci n’est pas une pipe). Arts Education Policy Review, 108(3), 3–12.
Global Access Partners (2011). 20 years after the Dawkins review: Tertiary Music Education in Australia. http://www.globalaccesspartners.org/eventedu.htm. Accessed December 12, 2011.
Gray, C., & Pirie, I. (1995). Artistic research procedure: Research at the edge of chaos? Paper presented at the Principles and Definitions: Five Papers by the European Postgraduate Art & Design Group. Winchester School of Art, Winchester, UK.
Grech, J. (2006). Practice-led research and scientific knowledge. Media International Australia; Incorporating Culture & Policy, 118(February 2006), 34–42.
Haig, I. (2016) All that is bad. NiTRO 26 September 2016. Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts. http://www.ddca.edu.au/nitro/articles/edition-3/all-that-is-bad. Accessed October 14, 2016.
Hugo, G. (2005). Some emerging demographic issues on Australia’s teaching academic workforce. Higher Education Policy, 18, 207–229.
Hunt, E. (2010). Creativity in a School of Art and Design: Opportunities, Barriers, and Achievements in contributing to a University Entrepreneurial strategy. DBA. University of Huddersfield. Huddersfield UK. Retrieved from: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/11978/
Jewesbury, D. (2009). Some problems with ‘research’ in UK fine art institutions. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–3.
Jones, T. E. (2006). A method of search for reality: Research and research degrees in art and design. In K. Macleod & L. Holdridge (Eds.), Thinking through Art: Reflections on art as research (pp. 226–240). Routledge.
Kroll, J. (2002). Creative writing as research and the dilemma of accreditation: How do we prove the value of what we do? Text, 6.
Lesage, D. (2009). Who’s afraid of artistic research? On measuring artistic research output. Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 2(2).
Lesage, D. (2007). A Portrait of the artist as researcher. Summit: Non aligned initiatives in education culture. http://summit.kein.org/node/233
Marshall, T., & Newton, S. (2000). Scholarly design as a paradigm for practice-based research. Working Papers in Art and Design 1, 1–7,
Millard, K. (2008). Writing and improvising the digital essay film: the boot cake. Paper presented at The Australian Screen Production Education and Research Association Conference 2008, RMIT, Melbourne.
National Association of Music Making. (2003). Gallup Organization reveals findings of ‘American Attitudes toward Music Making’ Survey. Press Release. Accessed on 29 March 2014 at: http://www.namm.org/news/press-releases/gallup-organization-reveals-findings-american-atti
Nelson, R. H. (2009). The jealousy of ideas: Research methods in the creative arts. Fitzroy, Victoria: Elikon.
Oakley, K. (2009). The disappearing arts: Creativity and innovation after the creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(4), 403–413.
O’Toole, J. (2010). A preflective keynote: IDIERI 2009: Research in drama education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 15(2), 271–292.
Roennfeldt, P. (2011). Beyond the ivory tower: Higher education institutions as cultural resource: Case study of the Queensland Conservatorium of music. History Compass, 9(4), 231–245.
Schippers, H. (2007). The marriage of art and academia: Challenges and opportunities for music research in practice-based environments. Dutch Journal of Music Theory, 12, 34–40.
Schippers, H. (2004). Musical practice in slow-motion: Emerging directions for Australian research in music. Sounds Australia, 64, 26–27.
Scrivener, S. (2002). The art object does not embody a form of knowledge. Working Papers in Art and Design, 2.
Singerman, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American university. Berkley: University of California Press.
Stock, C. (2010). Aesthetic tensions: Evaluating outcomes for practice-led research and industry. Text special issue: Symposium: Creative and practice led research—current status, future plans October 2010.
Stock, C. (2009). Choreographing research: Supervising the dancing thesis. Text Special issue series no 6. Special Issue: Supervising the Creative Arts Research Higher Degree: Towards Best Practice, 13, 1–15.
Svenungsson, J. (2009). The writing artist. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–6.
The MetLife Foundation/Civic Ventures. (2005). New Face of Work Survey. Accessed on 29 March 2014 at: http://www.encore.org/files/nfw_commentaries.pdf
Wilson, J. (2016a). A walk through QUT’s new multimillion creative precinct. News. NiTRO. Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts.www.ddca.edu.au/nitro/articles/2016/8/8/a-walk-through-quts-new-multimillion-creative-precinct. Accessed January 13, 2017.
Wilson, J. (2016b). Artistic research: In conversation with Henk Borgdorff. NiTRO. Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts. http://www.ddca.edu.au/nitro/articles/edition-2/artistic-research-in-conversation-with-henk-borgdorff. Accessed September 27, 2016.
Wilson, M. (2007). Art School and the Old Grey Cardigan test. Variant, 29, 22–23.
Woodrow, R. (2005). The irrelevant consumers of culture. Paper presented at the ACUADS Conference 2005. Edith Cowan University, Perth.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, J. (2018). Artistic Evolution or Goal Displacement?: The Influence of Academia upon Artistic Approach, Identity and Artwork. In: Artists in the University . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5774-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5774-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5773-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5774-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)