Skip to main content

Exploring Cogenerativity in Initial Teacher Education School-University Partnerships Using the Methodology of Metalogue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educating Future Teachers: Innovative Perspectives in Professional Experience

Abstract

This chapter explores the concept of ‘cogenerativity’ by providing three different examples of initial teacher education school-university partnership projects in Australia. The first of these professional experience projects drew on the use of participatory approaches in a new Master of Teaching program; the second involved a project of co-teaching triads; and the third concerned the development of university, school and system partnerships. The authors used the methodology of metalogue to engage in dialogical exchange about the notion of cogenerativity in relation to the literature and through the lens of each project to examine the nature of the concept for developing and sustaining professional experience partnerships. The chapter concludes that cogenerativity may be useful for conceptualising why and how initial teacher education school-university partnerships flourish. The knowledge developed may assist educators and researchers not only to create supportive conditions for the development of initial teacher education school-university partnerships but also to [re]imagine the possibilities of such partnerships to realise continual expansive transformative learning for all involved. The use of metalogue offered a unique research methodology for the authors who each explored their experience of school-university partnerships. At the same time, the use of metalogue illustrated cogenerativity in practice. The approach also enabled the authors to highlight possible challenges and limitations for creating and sustaining cogenerativity in the context of initial teacher education school-university partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. M. (2011). Stakeholders’ perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 742–750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. M., Howells, K., & Radford, R. (2013). A ‘Partnership in Teaching Excellence’: Ways in which one school-university partnership has fostered teacher development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 99–110. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.753988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2015). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and Procedures. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/accreditation-of-ite-programs-in-australia.pdf

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2016). Guidance for the accreditation of initial teacher education in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/guidance-for-the-accreditation-of-initial-teacher-education-in-australia.pdf

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972, 1987). Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Toronto, Canada: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing-Wilson, D., Lecusay, R., & Cole, M. (2011). Design experimentation and mutual appropriation: Two strategies for university/community collaborative after-school interventions. Theory and Psychology, 21(5), 656–680. doi:10.1177/0959354311414456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2007). Relational agency in professional practice: A CHAT analysis. Action: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, J. E. (2016). Supporting online faculty through communities of practice: Finding the faculty voice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 84–93. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.910129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, H. (2012). Developing WITHIN practice PD: A cultural-historical approach to understanding the institutional practice of teachers’ professional development. (PhD thesis), Monash University, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/709156.

  • Grimmett, H. (2014). The practice of teachers’ professional development: A cultural-historical approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herbers, M. S., Antelo, A., Ettling, D., & Buck, M. A. (2011). Improving teaching through a community of practice. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(2), 89–108. doi:10.1177/1541344611430688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P. (2013). Mentoring as professional development: ‘Growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Schools Queensland (ISQ). (2011–2016). Preservice. Retrieved from: http://www.isq.qld.edu.au/preservice

  • Kennelly, R., & McCormack, C. (2015). Creating more ‘elbow room’ for collaborative reflective practice in the competitive, performative culture of today’s university. Higher Education Research and Development. 2015, 34(5), 942–956. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.911259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Cornu, R., & Ewing, R. (2008). Reconceptualising professional experiences in pre-service teacher education. Reconstructing the past to embrace the future. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(7), 1799–1812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. H. (2011). Features and strategies of supervisor professional community as a means of improving the supervision of preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 930–941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D., & Smith, R. (2012). Teacher education partnerships: An Australian research-based perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., Brown, R., Heck, D., Pendergast, D., & Kanasa, H. (2013). Professional identity pathways of educators in alternative schools: The utility of reflective practice groups for educator induction and professional learning. Reflective Practice, 14(2), 258–270. doi:10.1080/14623943.2012.749227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Scantlebury, K. (Eds.). (2010). Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., Patton, K., Madden, M., & Sinclair, C. (2010). From committee to community: The development and maintenance of a community of practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(4), 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronfeldt, M., & Reininger, M. (2012). More or better student teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1091–1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A. (2008). Collaboration and cogenerativity: On bridging the gaps and separating theory-practice and cognition-emotion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1, Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.-D. (2013). Parent-teacher engagement: A coteaching and cogenerative dialoguing approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.-D. (2016). Exploring cogenerativity for developing a coteaching community of practice in a parent-teacher engagement project. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 124–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.-D., & Exley, B. (2016). Language variation and change in the Australian Curriculum English: Integrating sub-strands through a pedagogy of metalogue. English in Australia – Special Edition, 51(2), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.-D., Kretschmann, G., Lewis, K., & Montes, C. (2014). An engaging pedagogy for social education: Coteaching in a teacher education program. The Social Educator, 32(3), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L.-D., & Menzie, K. (2012). Coteaching social education: An oasis in changing times. The Social Educator, 30(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., & He, C. (2010). Transforming the existing model of teaching practicum: A study of Chinese EFL student teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 57–73. doi:10.1080/02607470903462065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda-Dianne Willis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willis, LD., Grimmett, H., Heck, D. (2018). Exploring Cogenerativity in Initial Teacher Education School-University Partnerships Using the Methodology of Metalogue. In: Kriewaldt, J., Ambrosetti, A., Rorrison, D., Capeness, R. (eds) Educating Future Teachers: Innovative Perspectives in Professional Experience. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5483-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5484-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics