Abstract
Across the international research literature, references to the problematic ‘theory-practice gap’ in initial teacher education abound. Essentially, this refers to the dialectical positioning of university-based learning about teaching as abstracted theory in opposition to situated school-based learning about teaching through practice. This perceived theory-practice gap is exacerbated by the fact that the distinction between university-based and school-based learning is not only figurative but also literal, resulting in confusion amongst preservice teachers who often perceive an irreconcilable tension between the theories learned at the university and the practices observed during their professional experience in schools.
Policy reform and popular debate around this persistent problem tend to focus attention on rebalancing the ratios of theoretical and practical learning in initial teacher education. But recent scholarship on the subject offers a new paradigm in which theory meets practice and in which university- and school-based learning come together in a third space of mutuality, hybridity and collaboration. Popularised by Ken Zeichner, third space theory is gathering momentum as a framework for closing the theory-practice gap in initial teacher education, especially as it plays out in the professional experience component. Third space theory is being variously applied across contexts to (re)frame school-university partnerships and the role and position of various stakeholders within them.
So, what is third space theory all about? What makes it useful for reconceptualising partnerships in initial teacher education? What is its genealogy as a conceptual, philosophical and political framework? And what kinds of attendant considerations should be taken into account by teacher education scholars looking to apply it to their thinking? These questions form the focus of this chapter, which offers a critical analysis of the development of third space theory and an interrogation of the possibilities and limitations of its application to the professional experience context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture and difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawerence and Wishart.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Cahill, H., Coffey, J., McLean Davies, L., Kriewaldt, J., Freeman, E., Acquaro, D., et al. (2016). Learning with and from: Positioning school students as advisors in pre-service teacher education. Teacher Development, 20(3), 295–312. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1155478.
Greca, I. M. (2016). Supporting pre-service elementary teachers in their understanding of inquiry teaching through the construction of a third discursive space. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 791–813. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1165892.
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3.
Gutiérrez, K. D., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445.
Jackson, A., & Burch, J. (2016). School direct, a policy for initial teacher training in England: Plotting a principled pedagogical path through a changing landscape. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 511–526. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1052090.
Le Cornu, R. J. (2012). School co-ordinators: Leaders of learning in professional experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 18–33.
Martin, S. D., Snow, J. L., & Torrez, C. A. (2011). Navigating the terrain of third space: Tensions with/in relationships in school-university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 299–311. doi:10.1177/0022487110396096.
McDonough, S. (2014). Rewriting the script of mentoring pre-service teachers in third space: Exploring tensions of loyalty, obligation and advocacy. Studying Teacher Education, 10(3), 210–221. doi:10.1080/17425964.2014.949658.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1995). Interview with cultural theorist Homi Bhabha. Artforum International Magazine, 33(7), 80–84.
Ng, W., Nicholas, H., & Williams, A. (2010). School experience influences on pre-service teachers’ evolving beliefs about effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 278–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.010.
Richardson Bruna, K. (2009). Jesús and María in the jungle: An essay on possibility and constraint in the third-shift third space. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(1), 221–237. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9159-0.
Rorrison, D. (2005). Turning a critical lens on the practicum in secondary pre-service teacher education programs. Paper presented at the AARE 2005 International education research conference, UWS Parramatta.
Sinner, A. (2010). Negotiating spaces: The in-betweenness of becoming a teacher. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 23–27. doi:10.1080/13598660903474171.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., & Abrams, L. (2014). Tensions of reimagining our roles as teacher educators in a third space: Revisiting a co/autoethnography through a faculty lens. Studying Teacher Education, 10(1), 3–19. doi:10.1080/17425964.2013.866549.
Williams, J. (2013). Boundary crossing and working in the third space: Implications for a teacher educator’s identity and practice. Studying Teacher Education, 9(2), 118–129. doi:10.1080/17425964.2013.808046.
Youens, B., Smethem, L., & Sullivan, S. (2014). Promoting collaborative practice and reciprocity in initial teacher education: Realising a ‘dialogic space’ through video capture analysis. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 101–113. doi:10.1080/02607476.2013.871163.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022487109347671.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forgasz, R., Heck, D., Williams, J., Ambrosetti, A., Willis, LD. (2018). Theorising the Third Space of Professional Experience Partnerships. In: Kriewaldt, J., Ambrosetti, A., Rorrison, D., Capeness, R. (eds) Educating Future Teachers: Innovative Perspectives in Professional Experience. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5484-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5483-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5484-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)