Skip to main content

Publishing Misconduct Including Plagiarism and Permissions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper
  • 5542 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Das N, Panjabi M. Plagiarism: why is it such a big issue for medical writers? Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:67–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar PM, Priya NS, Musalaiah S, Nagasree M. Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(Suppl 3):S193–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohammed RAA, Shaaban OM, Mahran DG, Attellawy HN, Makhlof A, Albasri A. Plagiarism in medical scientific research. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2015;10:6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jawaid SA. Publish or perish: need to have another look? Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32:267–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaraman KS. Indian science adviser caught up in plagiarism row. [internet] c2012 [cited 2016 Sept 05] Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/indian-science-adviser-caught-up-in-plagiarism-row-1.10102

  7. Wager E. How should editors respond to plagiarism? COPE discussion paper. [internet] c2011 [cited 2016 Sept 06]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/files/COPE_plagiarism_discussion_%20doc_26%20Apr%2011.pdf

  8. What constitutes plagiarism? Harvard Guide to Using Sources. [internet] c2016 [cited 2016 Sept 06]. Available from: http://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism

  9. Academic Honesty. John E Mayfield Library [internet] c2016 [cited 2016 Sept 06] Available from: http://nscc.libguides.com/c.php?g=292492&p=1947823

  10. Fair Use. United States Copyright Office. [internet] [cited 2016 Sept 06]. Available from: http://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html

  11. Indian Copyright Act of 1957. Infringement of Copyright. Sect. 52 (1). [internet] [cited 2016 Sept 06]. Available from: http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/upload_document/CprAct.pdf

  12. Indian Copyright Act of 1957. Offences. Sect. 63A. [internet] [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/upload_document/CprAct.pdf

  13. Flowcharts. Committee on Publication Ethics. [internet] c2016 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts

  14. Dupli Checker. Free online software for plagiarism detection [internet] c2016 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://www.duplichecker.com/

  15. Viper Plagiarism Scanner [internet] c2016 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://www.scanmyessay.com/

  16. PlagTracker [internet] [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://www.plagtracker.com/

  17. Paper Rater [internet] [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: https://www.paperrater.com/

  18. Dustball. The Plagiarism Checker [internet] [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://www.dustball.com/cs/plagiarism.checker/

  19. Turnitin [internet] Turnitin LCC; c2015 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Avaialable from: http://turnitin.com/

  20. WriteCheck [internet] Turnitin LCC; c2015 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: http://turnitin.com/

  21. iThenticate [internet] Turnitin LLC; c1998–2015 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from http://turnitin.com/

  22. Grammarly [internet] Grammarly Inc; c2015 [cited 2016 Sept 05]. Available from: https://www.grammarly.com/

  23. George SL, Buyse M. Data fraud in clinical trials. Clin Investig Lond. 2015;5:161–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Adithan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Case Scenario

Case Scenario

  1. 1.

    You find a very good illustrative diagram in a textbook that is suitable for a research manuscript that you are writing. Comment on the appropriateness of each scenario below.

    1. (a)

      You scan the page and insert the image in your manuscript without seeking copyright permission.

    2. (b)

      You redraw the diagram exactly as it has been published and insert in your manuscript without seeking copyright permission.

    3. (c)

      You reproduce the diagram either by scanning or redrawing but seek and obtain copyright permission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adithan, C., Surendiran, A. (2017). Publishing Misconduct Including Plagiarism and Permissions. In: Parija, S., Kate, V. (eds) Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4719-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4720-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics