Abstract
In the last fifteen years, new theoretical topics developed by different Soviet psychology authors in different moments of its development have been elucidated. Among these topics, Vygotsky’s concepts of perezhivanie and sense are particularly relevant because these signalised questions were not in focus in Soviet times; these concepts have remained in shadow for decades. These topics permit advancements in new psychological and complex systems, such as consciousness, personality and subjectivity , that are based on a new foundation. However, this advancement presupposes new epistemological and methodological challenges that, until today, have not been developed within this theoretical account. The present paper discusses the Qualitative Epistemology on which the basis of a constructive interpretative methodology is developed as a path for the study of subjectivity from a cultural–historical standpoint. This paper discusses one case study to make explicit the procedures that rule the construction of knowledge in this methodology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This text originally was published by Vygotsky in 1928.
- 2.
In this paper, Epistemology is defined as the needs and qualities that theoretical construction demands for consideration as “valid” as knowledge. The Theory for us is a system that enables the generations of intelligibility about the studied subject of a question that has a cultural, subjective and historical character.
- 3.
Subjective senses are the symbolical emotional units within which one of these processes evokes the other without becoming its cause. These subjective senses represent the way in which the historical experiences of the person become present in a presently lived situation. The subjective configurations represent the organisation of these subjective senses that define the emotions and the general psychological states that are dominant in each human experience.
- 4.
Despite the fact that those concepts have been widely defined in my other works, we would like to point out that the subjective senses are the flux of the symbolic-emotional process that defined the subjective character of any human experience; meanwhile, the subjective configurations are the organisations that emerge on the course of that flux in the course of human experiences through which are defined the main subjective states that characterise any human relation or performance in a particular moment of its development. The subjective configurations characterise both the social and individual subjective processes in such a manner that during any individual action within one concrete social space subjective senses configured, simultaneously, reciprocally and differently in social and individual subjectivity.
- 5.
The study of the subjective configuration of obesity is one of our lines of research and psychotherapy related to health.
References
Abulhanova, K. A. (1973). O subjekte psykhicheskoidetalenosti [On the subject of psychical activity]. Moscow: Nauka.
Akopov, G. V. (2009). The problem of consciousness in Russian psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(5), 3–25.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bruner, J. (1995). Reflecting on Russian consciousness. In L. Martin, K. Nelson, & E. Tobach (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice in doing and knowing (pp. 67–86). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0504_4
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: Aldine.
Fakhrutdinova, L. R. (2010). On the phenomenon of “Perezhivanie”. Journal of Russian & East European psychology, 48, 31–47.
Fleer, M., & Hammer, M. (2013). Emotions in imaginative situations: The valued place of fairytales for supporting emotion regulation. Mind, Culture & Activity, 20(3), 240–259.
Gergen, K. (2011). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford.
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
González Rey, F. (1979). Rol nravstvenninx idealov v formirovanie professionalniix namerenii u podrostkov I iunishii na Kube [Rol of moral ideals in the formation of professional intentions in Cuban adolescents and young people]. Thesis of doctoral degree in psychology, Moscow.
González Rey, F. (1983). Obshenie i evo znashenie v razrabotke problemy lishnosti [The communication and its relevance in the elaboration of the problem of personality]. Psykjologuishesky Zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 4(4), 40–47.
González Rey, F. (1997). Epistemología cualitativa y subjetividad. Habana: Pueblo y Educación.
González Rey, F. (2005). Pesquisa qualitativa e subjetividade: Os processos de construção de informação. São Paulo: Cengage Learning.
González Rey, F. (2009). Historical relevance of Vygotsky’s work: Its significance for a new approach to the problem of subjectivity in psychology. Outlines: Critical Practical Studies, 11, 59–73.
González Rey, F. (2011). A re-examination of defining moments in Vygotsky’s work and their implications for his continuing legacy. Mind, Culture & Activity, 18(3), 257–275.
González Rey, F. (2014). Advancing further the history of Soviet psychology: Moving forward from dominant representations in Western and Soviet psychology. History of Psychology, 17(1), 60–78.
González Rey, F., & Mitjans Martínez, A. (1989). La personalidad su educación y desarrollo. Habana: Pueblo y Educación.
Koch, S. (1999). Psychology in human contexts: Essays in dissidence and reconstruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lektorsky, V. (1999). Historical change of the notion of activity: Philosophical presuppositions. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 100–113). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Leontiev, A. A. (1992). Ecce Homo: Methodological problems. Multidisciplinary Letters for Activity Theory, 11(12), 41–45.
Lomov, B. F. (1984). Metodologisheskie e teoretisheskie problemy psykjologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow: Nauka.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici, S., & Markova, I. (2006). The making of modern social psychology: The hidden story of how an international social science was created. Cambridge: Polity.
Neliubin, N. I. (2009). On the functional correspondence of meanings and senses in the structure of consciousness. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(5), 26–43.
Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. New York: Open University Press.
Prigogine, I. (2004). Tan solo una ilusión? Una exploración del caos al orden. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1965). Psykjologiya izkustva [Psychology of Art]. Moscow: Izkustvo.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The diagnostics of development and the pedological clinic for difficult children. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (Vol. 2, pp. 241–291). New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). The science of psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 50(4), 85–106.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yarochevsky, M. G. (2007). L. S. Vygotsky: V poiskax novoi psykjologii [L. S. Vygotstky: In the search for a new psychology]. Moscow: LKI.
Yasnitsky, A. (2010). Archival revolution in Vygotskian studies? Uncovering Vygotsky’s archives. Journal of Russian and Eastern European Psychology, 48, 3–13. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-0405480100.
Yasnitsky, A. (2012). Revisionist revolution in Vygotskian science: Toward cultural-historical Gestalt psychology. Journal of Russian and East Eastern Psychology, 50(4), 3–15.
Zaporochets, A. V. (2002). Toward the question of the genesis, function and structure of emotional processes in the child. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 40(3), 45–66.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1995). Cultural-historical psychology and the psychological theory of activity: Retrospect and prospect. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 37–55). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2007). Thought and word: The approaches of L. S. Vygotsky and G. Shpet. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 212–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2009). Consciousness as the subject matter and task of psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(5), 44–75.
Zinchenko, Y., & Pervichko, E. (2013). Nonclassical and postnonclassical epistemology in Lev Vygotsky’s cultural historical approach in clinical psychology. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6(1), 43–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González Rey, F., Mitjáns Martinez, A. (2017). Epistemological and Methodological Issues Related to the New Challenges of a Cultural–Historical-Based Psychology. In: Fleer, M., González Rey, F., Veresov, N. (eds) Perezhivanie, Emotions and Subjectivity. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4534-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4534-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4532-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4534-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)