Skip to main content

Measuring the feeling: correlations of sensorial to instrumental analyses of cosmetic products

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CMBEBIH 2017

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 62))

Abstract

Sensory features of cosmetic products are one of their most important characteristics for consumer acceptance. Consumers preferably choose one product among many based on their perceptions: first of its packaging, and then of its smell, appearance and texture (touch and feel). When optimizing a product, in order to adapt it to the needs and desires of consumers, cosmetic companies use sensory evaluation methods. They require trained panels making them time-consuming and expensive.

On the other hand, rheological measurements and textural analysis are instrumental methods that offer fairly simpler, less expensive and much less time-consuming means of analysis, at the same time giving more objective and repeatable results.

Finding correlations between sensorial assessments and instrumental analyses, and being able to use instrumental instead of sensorial analyses would have great benefits in the development of cosmetic products. However, this is not an easily accomplished task.

In the available literature there are examples of these kind of studies on cosmetic emulsion systems (creams and lotions), but also on gels, foundations and raw materials. The prediction models are rarely developed and validated for having instrumental in lieu of sensory assessments.

These studies are very versatile in terms of chosen sensory attributes and, even more so, in terms of studied instrumental methods and chosen parameters. Therefore, it is very difficult to compare them and find matching correlations. As sensorial analyses are being developed and new instrumental analytical techniques introduced with supporting sophisticated softwares, the number of studied parameters increases and new correlations are being made.

It is still a worthy goal, however, to be able to instrumentally predict at least basic sensations associated with the use of cosmetic products to be used for screening in developmental phases of their making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Colipa (2008). Guidelines for the evaluation of the efficacy of cosmetic products.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stone, H., Sidel, J., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A., Singleton, R.C. (1974). Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Tech. 28: 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pense-Lheritier A.-M. (2015). Recent developments in the sensorial assessment of cosmetic products: a review.Int J Cosm Sci. 37:465-473.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guest S., McGlone F., Hopkinson A., Schendel Z.A., Blot K., Essick G. (2013). Perceptual and sensory-functional consequences of skin care products. JCDSA. 3: 66-78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parente M.A., Gambaro A., Solana G.(2005). Study of sensory properties of emollients used in cosmetics and their correlation with physicochemical properties. J Cosmet Sci. 56:175-182.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert L., Savary G., Grisel M., Picard C. (2013). Predicting sensory texture properties of cosmetic emulsions by physical measurements. Chemometr Intell Lab. 124: 21-31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ozkan S., Gillece T.W., Senak L., Moore D.J. (2012). Characterization of yield stress and slip behaviour of skin/hair care gels using steady flow and LAOS measurements and their correlation with sensorial attributes. Int J Cosm Sci. 34: 193-201.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lukic M., Jaksic I., Krstonosic V., Cekic N., Savic S. (2012). A combined approach in characterization of an effective w/o hand cream: the influence of emollient on textural, sensorial and in vivo skin performance. Int J Cosm Sci. 34: 140-149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Estranqueiro M., Amaral M.H., Sousa Lobo J.M. (2016). Comparison between sensory and instrumental characterization of topical formulations: impact of thickening agents. Int J Cosm Sci. 38:389-398.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moravkova T., Stern P. (2011). Rheological and textural properties of cosmetic emulsions. ApplRheol. 21(3):35200-1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moravkova T., Filip P. (2013). The influence of emulsifier on rheological and sensory properties of cosmetic lotions. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013:1-7, Article ID 168503.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bekker M., Webber G.V., Louw N.R. (2013). Relating rheological measurements to primary and secondary skin feeling when mineral-based and Fischer-Tropsch wax-based cosmetic emulsions and jellies are applied to the skin. Int J Cosm Sci. 35:354-361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elezović Alisa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alisa, E., Jasmina, H., Ognjenka, R., Edina, V. (2017). Measuring the feeling: correlations of sensorial to instrumental analyses of cosmetic products. In: Badnjevic, A. (eds) CMBEBIH 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 62. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4165-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4166-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics