Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concept, Structures, and Decision Factors of Open Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Model Design Compass

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 2227 Accesses

Abstract

This paper first explains and demonstrates the emergence of open innovation. We also show the structure of open innovation among manufacturing firms and service firms. Last, we show the four factors of open innovation of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Third, we look into the open innovation of small and medium enterprises. Fourth, we examine the difference in open innovation according to the product life cycle. Fifth, we analyze the role of internal open innovation attitude regarding external open innovation. Sixth, we talk about the difference in open innovation according to whether a firm is modular or not. Seventh and last, we discuss the difference in open innovation according to regional innovation systems or clusters.

This chapter is mainly based on the following papers:

Yun J.H.J. Ryu G.W. (2009) A Preliminary Study On the Theory and Phenomena of Korea Open Innovation. International Commerce and Information Review. Vol. 11, No. 2(in Korean)

Yun J.H.J., Jung W.Y. (2013) Open Innovation of SMEs in Manufacturing from OI Structure Model, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 7, No. 1,

Yun J.H.J., Kim B.T. (2011). A preliminary study on New Innovation Phenomena based on IT Technology Development, Journal of Daegu Gyeongbuk Development Institute. Vol. 10, No. 1 (in Korean)

Yun J.H.J., Ryu G.W., Jung W.Y. (2013) Is There Any Difference in the Effect of Open Innovation According to the Product Life Cycle?: Revisiting the Relationship Between Product Life Cycle and Trade. Journal of International Trade & Commerce. Vol. 9, No. 2

Yun J.H.J., Mohan A.V. (2012) The Relation Between Internal and External Open Innovation. In Bream A, Tidd J. (eds) Perspectives on supplier innovation; Theories, Concepts and Empirical Insights on Open Innovation and the Integration of Suppliers, London: Imperial College Press.

Yun J.H.J., Ryu G.W., (2012) A Study on the Difference of Open Innovation Effect between Modular and Non Modular Firms in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 6, No. 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Lablets” are small research facilities located adjacent to three leading university research centers—Carnegie Mellon University, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Washington —instead of next to Intel fab facilities. As with other parts of its R&D system, Intel manages these new entities in a decidedly untraditional manner (Chesbrough 2003, p. 123).

References

  • Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 80(7):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt RL (2009) Inside Larry and Sergey’s brain. Penguin Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian A (2005) Old economy inputs for new economy outcomes: cluster formation in the new Silicon Valley. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006a) Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006b) Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesgrough H (2007) Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strateg Leadersh 35(6):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2011) Open services innovation: rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2006) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2014) New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaroni D, Chiesa V, Frattini F (2010) Unravelling the process from closed to open innovation: evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries. R&D Managment 40(3):222–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen K (2012) Questions for Henry Chesbrough: the man who wrote the book on open innovation explains how not to get stuck in the ‘commodity trap’. Rotman Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2005) Regional knowledge capabilities and open innovation: regional innovation systems and clusters in asymmetric knowledge economy. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2007) Theorizing regional knowledge capabilities: economic geography under ‘open innovation’. In: Suriñach J, Moreno R, Vayá E (eds) Knowledge externalities, innovation clusters and regional development. Edward Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G (1997) Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Res Policy 26(4):475–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z, Loch C, Grossmann B, He R (2012) How provider selection and management contribute to successful innovation outsourcing: an empirical study at Siemens. Prod Oper Manag 21(1):29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni R (2010) Beating the commodity trap: how to maximize your competitive position and increase your pricing power. Harvard Husiness School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie JE (2006) Managing innovation: new technology, new products, and new services in a global economy, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M, Braunerhjelm P (2006) The genesis of industrial cluster. In: Braunerhjelm P, Feldman M (eds) Cluster genesis: technology-based industrial development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen R, Thursby M (1986) A strategic approach to the product life cycle. J Int Econ 21:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1979) A model of innovation, technology transfer and the world distribution of income. J Polit Econ 87:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg Manag J 27:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lina L, Dalin W (2013) The analysis of substituting ability of new products: based on a prey-predator model. J Int Trade Commer 9(1):591–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luecke R (2003) Managing creativity and innovation. Harvard Business Essentials, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoyaozong Z (2005) The seven success lessons from Google. Xipsaiae Publishing, Seoul. , translated in 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggioni M (2006) Mors Tua, Vita Mea? The rise and fall of innovative industrial clusters. In: Braunerhjelm P, Feldman M (eds) Cluster genesis: technology-based industrial development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P (2001) Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Ind Corp Chang 10(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Konno N (1995) Intellectualizing capability. Book 21 Publishing Group, Seoul. Translated from Korean in 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozman M (2011) Modularity, industry life cycle and open innovation. J Technol Manage Innov 6(1):26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Kramer M (2011) Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harv Bus Rev 89:62–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf L, Tushman M (1998) The coevolution of community networks and technology: lessons from the flight simulation industry. Ind Corp Chang 7:311–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D (2000) Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strateg Manag J 21:369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A, Hsu J (2005) The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading. In: Breschi S, Malerba F (eds) Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom PS, Anant TC, Dinopoulos E (1990) A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. Am Econ Rev 80:1077–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Simard C, West J (2006) Knowledge networks and the geographic locus of innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Wang Q (2011) Open innovation in small and medium enterprise under the view of knowledge management. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE ICMIT, pp 4690–4693

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback J, Abernathy W (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vrande V, De Jong JP, Vanhaverbeke W, De Rochemont M (2009) Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation 29(6):423–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q J Econ 80:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voelpel S, Leibold M, Tekie E (2004) The wheel of business model reinvention: how to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors. J Chang Manag 4(3):259–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon D (2004) The impacts of Korean exporting firms’ market orientation and learning orientation on product innovation performance. J Korea Trade 8(2):85–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Young J, Simon W (2005) iCon: Steve jobs: the greatest second act in the history of business. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun JJ (2015) How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian dynamics of open innovation. J Open Innov Technol Market Complex 1(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun JHJ, Jung WY (2013) Open innovation of SMEs in manufacturing from OI structure model. Asia Pac J Innov Entrep 7(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun JHJ, Ryu GW, Jung WY (2013) Is there any difference in the effect of open innovation according to the product life cycle?: revisiting the relationship between product life cycle and trade. J Int Trade Commer 9(2):17–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tenured Researcher of DGIST and Professor of Open Innovation Academy of SOItmC, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

    JinHyo Joseph Yun

Authors
  1. JinHyo Joseph Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yun, J.J. (2017). Concept, Structures, and Decision Factors of Open Innovation. In: Business Model Design Compass. Management for Professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4128-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation