Abstract
This chapter analyzes policies of widening participation (WP) in elite higher education institutions and, more specifically, the programs launched in France in the early 2000s. Although these policies concern a small number of beneficiaries and are still far from significantly improving the access of disadvantaged students to the most selective sector of higher education, they represent an interesting object of study for sociologists of education for at least two reasons. The first is that these policies have to some extent modified the internal power relations between institutions in the field of elite higher education. The second is that the institutions involved have proposed analyses of, and solutions to, educational inequalities that have influenced the way in which the latter are framed and tackled at the local and national level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The French higher education system comprises the grandes écoles and preparatory classes offering 5-year programs corresponding to the master level; universities (which are generally public and nonselective) offering 3, 5, and 8-year programs corresponding to the bachelor, master, and Ph.D. levels; and 2-year vocational programs provided either by secondary schools or by Institutes of Technology.
- 2.
The concours is a competitive exam for a limited number of places created after the French Revolution to recruit and train “talented” youth to occupy high-level technical and administrative state positions. The classes préparatoires aux grandes écoles (CPGEs) were created to help students prepare for the concours during two to three years after the baccalauréat. They are located in lycées (high schools) but are considered a segment of higher education.
- 3.
Lycées are high schools that prepare pupils during 3 years for the final national examination, the baccalauréat, necessary to continue further into higher education. Students are separated into several tracks (academic, technical, and vocational), which are not always present in all institutions. The CPGE, as well as Sciences Po, recruit the vast majority of their students from the academic tracks only.
- 4.
For lack of space, I do not present in this chapter another emblematic initiative launched by one of the two most prestigious public CPGEs in Paris studied in this research. This initiative was later duplicated by a few other CPGEs, but given the institutional differences between CPGEs and GEs, these initiatives were not seen as comparable or in competition with the Sciences Po and Essec schemes.
- 5.
The term “banlieues” is used in France to refer to the outskirts of big cities, especially Paris, characterized by strong concentrations of disadvantaged and ethnic minority groups.
- 6.
There are three main tracks in high school: academic, general, and vocational.
References
Albouy, V., & Wanecq, T. (2003). Les inégalités sociales d’accès aux Grandes Ecoles. Economie et Statistique, 361, 27–52.
Allouch, A. (2013). L’ouverture sociale comme configuration éducative. Pratiques et processus de socialisation et de sélection des milieux populaires dans les établissements d’élite. Une comparaison France-Angleterre. Dissertation, Sciences Po.
Archer, L. (2003). Social class and higher education. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class. Issues of exclusion and inclusion (pp. 5–20). Abingdon and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Belhoste, B. (2002). L’anatomie d’un concours. L’organisation de l’examen d’admission à l’Ecole Polytechnique de la Révolution à nos jours. Histoire de l’éducation, 94, 2–27.
Bénabou, R., Kramarz, F., & Prost, C. (2005). The French zones d’éducation prioritaire. Much ado about nothing? Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 345–356.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard. English edition: Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism (trans: Elliott, G.). New York: Verso.
Bongrand, P. (2011). L’introduction controversée de l’“excellence” dans la politique française d’éducation prioritaire (1999–2005). Revue française de pédagogie, 177, 11–24.
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Genève: Droz. English edition: Bourdieu, P. Outline of a theory of practice (trans: Nice, R.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Quelques propriétés des champs. In Bourdieu, P. Questions de sociologie. Paris: Minuit. English edition: Bourdieu, P. (1993). Some properties of fields. In Bourdieu, P. Sociology in Question (trans: Nice, R.) (pp. 72–77). London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). La noblesse d’Etat. Grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Minuit. English edition: Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility (trans: Clough, L.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1964). Les héritiers. Les étudiants et la culture. Paris: Minuit. English edition: Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture (trans: Nice, R.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Saint-Martin, M. (1987). Agrégation et segregation. Le champ des grandes écoles et le champ du pouvoir. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 69(1), 2–50.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Brennan, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56(3), 287–302.
Brinbaum, Y., & Guégnard, C. (2013). Choice and enrollments in French secondary and higher education: Repercussions for second-generation immigrants. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 481–502.
Brown, G. (2012). The place of aspiration in UK widening participation policy: Moving up or moving beyond? In J. Norton, P. Kraftl, & F. Tucker (Eds.), Critical geographies of children and youth (pp. 97–113). Bristol: Policy Press.
David, M. (2010). Introduction to the dilemmas of widening participation in higher education. In M. David et al. (Eds.), Improving learning by widening participation in higher education (pp. 3–27). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37, 1–44.
Espenshade, T. J., & Radford, A. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal. Race and class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Euriat, M., & Thélot, C. (1995). Le recrutement social de l’élite scolaire en France. Evolution des inégalités de 1950 à 1990. Revue Française de Sociologie, 36, 403–438.
Felouzis, G., Maroy, C., & van Zanten, A. (2013). Les marchés scolaires. Sociologie d’une politique publique d’éducation. Paris: PUF.
Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gale, T., & Hodge, S. (2014). Just imaginary: Delimiting social inclusion in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(5), 688–709.
Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753.
Giddens, A. (1972). Elites in the British class structure. Sociological Review, 20(3), 345–372.
Grodsky, E. (2007). Compensatory sponsorship in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1662–1712.
Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and symbolic order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Henriot-van Zanten, A. (1990). L’école et l’espace local. Lyon: PUL.
Ichou, M., & van Zanten, A. (2014). France. In P. J. Stevens & G. A. Dworkin (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of race and ethnic inequalities in education (pp. 328–364). London: Palgrave.
Jones, S. (2013). “Ensure that you stand out from the crowd”: A corpus-based analysis of personal statements according to applicants’ school type. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 397–423.
Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen. The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale and Princeton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
King, R., Marginson, S., & Naidoo, R. (Eds.). (2013). The globalization of higher education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kingston, P. W., & Lewis, L. L. (1990). The high-status track. Studies of elite schools and stratification. New York: SUNY.
Lazuech, G. (1999). L’exception française. Le modèle des grandes écoles à l’épreuve de la mondialisation. Rennes: PUR.
Mame-Fatou, D., & Wasmer, E. (2016). Evaluating pre-market discrimination: The Conventions d’éducation prioritaire in Sciences Po. Paris: LIEPP.
Merle, P. (2000). Le concept de démocratisation de l’institution scolaire: une typologie et sa mise à l’épreuve. Population, 55(1), 15–50.
Mountford-Zimdars, A., & Sabbagh, D. (2013). Fair access to higher education. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 359–368.
Parry, G. (2010). Policy contexts: Differentiation, competition and policies for widening participation. In M. David et al. (Eds.), Improving Learning by Widening Participation in Higher Education (pp. 31–46). London and New York: Routledge.
Pirone, P., & Rayou, P. (2012). Nouveaux internes, anciens décrocheurs: de l’évolution de la forme scolaire. Revue française de pédagogie, 179, 49–62.
Rothblatt, S. (2007) Education’s Abiding Moral Dilemma. Merit and worth in the cross-Atlantic democracies, 1800–2006. Oxford: Symbosium Books.
Sabbagh, D. (2006). Une convergence problématique: les stratégies de légitimation de la “discrimination positive” dans l’enseignement supérieur aux États-Unis et en France. Politix, 1, 211–229.
Skrentny, J. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action. Politics, culture and justice in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Solomon, L. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soubiron, A. (2010). L’action publique expérimentale. Les dispositifs d’égalité de chances et de diversité dans les grandes écoles françaises. Dissertation, Université Paris Dauphine.
St. Clair, R., & Benjamin, A. (2011). Performing desires: The dilemma of aspirations and educational attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 501–517.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.
Suleiman, E. (1978). Elites in French society: The politics of survival. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power. The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. (2006). It depends. In R. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 3–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 25(6), 855–867.
Sutton Trust. (2010). Widening access to selective universities. London: The Sutton Trust.
van Zanten, A. (2009a). The sociology of elite education. In M. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), International handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 329–339). New York: Routledge.
van Zanten, A. (2009b). Choisir son école. Stratégies parentales et médiations locales. Paris: PUF.
van Zanten, A. (2010). L’ouverture sociale des Grandes Ecoles. Diversification des élites ou renouveau des politiques éducatives? Sociétés Contemporaines, 79, 69–95.
van Zanten, A. (2012). L’école de la périphérie. Scolarité et segregation en banlieue (2nd ed.). Paris: PUF.
van Zanten, A. (2015). A family affair: Reproducing elite positions and preserving the ideal of meritocratic competition and youth autonomy. In A. van Zanten, S. J. Ball, & B. Darchy-Koechlin (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2015. Elites, privilege and excellence: The national and global redefinition of educational advantage (pp. 29–42). London and New York: Routledge.
van Zanten, A. (2016). La fabrication familiale et scolaire des élites et les voies de mobilité ascendante en France. Année Sociologique, 66(1), 81–113.
van Zanten, A., & Maxwell, C. (2015). Elite education and the state in France: Durable ties and new challenges. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(1), 71–94.
Wagner, A. C. (2012). La noblesse d’Etat et ses prolongements (pp. 169–192). In F. Lebaron & G. Mauger (Eds.), Lectures de Pierre Boudieu. Paris: Ellypse.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Zanten, A. (2017). Widening Participation in France and Its Effects on the Field of Elite Higher Education and on Educational Policy. In: Parker, S., Gulson, K., Gale, T. (eds) Policy and Inequality in Education. Education Policy & Social Inequality, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4039-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4039-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4037-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4039-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)